Skip to content

Where are you from?

Choose your province and we will tell you how the deputies and senators you elected vote, one by one.

 

We remember it in this browser. If you create an account, we keep it there.

Type a law, a topic, a person or a province.

What it is

Proposal to remove powers added to the Constitutional Court in 2015

Amendments step 3 of 7 · Unfinished

It is a members’ bill. Introduced by parliamentary groups, the Senate, regional governments or citizens. It was introduced on 4 November 2016. Introduced by: Grupo Parlamentario Vasco (EAJ-PNV).

Official title: Organic Private member's bill to amend Organic Law 2/1979, of October 3, on the Constitutional Court.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000042· updated 11 Nov

Automatic summary, not yet reviewed

  1. The bill would return the Constitutional Court's governing law to how it stood before the 2015 reforms, which created the prior constitutionality review and new mechanisms to enforce the Court's rulings.
  2. The text criticizes the prior constitutionality review of Statutes of Autonomy bills: it says it works as a political veto not provided for in the Constitution and politicizes the Court.
  3. It also criticizes the 2015 enforcement mechanisms, such as suspending authorities or public employees or handing enforcement to the Government, because it sees them as disguised sanctions that break the balance of powers.
  4. The bill would remove the prior constitutionality review and the title of the law governing the reinforced enforcement of the Court's rulings, as well as Article 79.
  5. It restores the earlier wording of several articles: the Court may impose coercive fines of €600 to €3,000 on anyone who fails to comply with its orders, and all public powers must comply with its rulings, with preferent judicial assistance from the courts.
  6. The law would enter into force the day after its publication in the Official State Gazette.

Who it affects

  • The Constitutional Court (Tribunal Constitucional): It would lose the prior constitutionality review and the reinforced enforcement mechanisms for its rulings.
  • The Spanish Parliament and regional parliaments: Prior review of Statutes of Autonomy reform bills would be removed.
  • Authorities and public employees: They could no longer be suspended by the Court as an enforcement measure, though they could still face coercive fines for non-compliance.
  • The Government: It would lose the possibility of being entrusted by the Court with substitute enforcement of its rulings.

Words worth knowing

Recurso previo de inconstitucionalidad
Prior constitutionality review: allows an organic bill to be brought before the Constitutional Court before it is passed, to check whether it fits the Constitution.
Estatuto de Autonomía
Statute of Autonomy: the basic law of each Spanish autonomous community, passed by Parliament and ratified by referendum.
Multas coercitivas
Coercive fines: repeatable fines meant to pressure someone into complying with an order, not to punish a crime.
Auxilio jurisdiccional
Judicial assistance: help that courts provide to another body to carry out its decisions.
Aforamiento
Special legal protection for certain officials, who can only be tried by specific courts.

It summarizes the text as it was introduced. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries

Where it stands

How far did it get?

It took 3 of 7 steps. It reached Amendments, and today it is unfinished.

  1. Introduced4 November 2016Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
  2. Admitted8 November 2016The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
  3. Amendments30 December 2016Groups propose changes.
  4. Committeenot reachedA committee goes through the text in detail.
  5. Plenarynot reachedAll 350 deputies vote.
  6. Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
  7. BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 9 official steps on a timeline
Dec 2016Mar 2017Jun 2017Sept 2017Dec 2017Mar 2018Jun 2018Sept 2018Dec 201811. 4 November 2016: Presentación22. 8 November 2016: Boletín Oficial de las Cortes Generales Publicación desde 08/11/2016 hasta 11/11/201633. 8 November 2016: Calificación44. 11 November 2016: Gobierno Contestación desde 11/11/2016 hasta 13/12/201655. 13 December 2016: Pleno Toma en consideración desde 13/12/2016 hasta 20/12/201666. 20 December 2016: Mesa del Congreso Acuerdo subsiguiente a la toma en consideración desde 20/12/2016 hasta 27/12/201677. 27 December 2016: Comisión Constitucional Publicación desde 27/12/2016 hasta 30/12/201688. 30 December 2016: Comisión Constitucional Enmiendas desde 30/12/2016 hasta 05/03/201999. 5 March 2019: Concluido - (Caducado) desde 05/03/2019 hasta 27/03/2019

20 December 2016

How did the plenary vote?

More votes in favour 176 yes · 165 no

Voted on: Private member's bill of the Basque Parliamentary Group (EAJ-PNV), Organic bill reforming Organic Law 2/1979, of October 3, on the Constitutional Court.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 2 of sitting 22· updated 10 Nov

Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.

Your province

How did the deputies from your province vote?

And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.

Or see how most of each province voted
More details: how each group and each province voted

The groups

Who voted in favour and who against?

In favour, most of Socialista, Vasco (EAJ-PNV), Mixto, Gcup-ec-em and GER. Against, most of Ciudadanos and Popular en el Congreso. 2 deputies voted differently from their group.

By province: in 14 most voted in favour; in 24, against.

Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.

  • In favour: 14
  • Against: 24
  • Tie: 14
Result by parliamentary group
GroupSeatsHow it voted
Socialista84
82 in favour · 2 did not vote
Vasco (EAJ-PNV)5
5 in favour
Mixto19
15 in favour · 2 against · 2 did not vote
Ciudadanos32
32 against
Gcup-ec-em67
67 in favour
GER9
7 in favour · 2 did not vote
Popular en el Congreso134
131 against · 3 did not vote

What happens next

What happens now?

The legislature ended before it finished. To go on, someone would have to introduce it again in the new Cortes.

It was presented again:

Presented before in:

Sources

Where does all this come from?

  • The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
  • Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
  • We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.