What it is
Proposal to remove powers added to the Constitutional Court in 2015
It is a members’ bill. Introduced by parliamentary groups, the Senate, regional governments or citizens. It was introduced on 4 November 2016. Introduced by: Grupo Parlamentario Vasco (EAJ-PNV).
Official title: Organic Private member's bill to amend Organic Law 2/1979, of October 3, on the Constitutional Court.
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000042· updated 11 Nov
Automatic summary, not yet reviewed
- The bill would return the Constitutional Court's governing law to how it stood before the 2015 reforms, which created the prior constitutionality review and new mechanisms to enforce the Court's rulings.
- The text criticizes the prior constitutionality review of Statutes of Autonomy bills: it says it works as a political veto not provided for in the Constitution and politicizes the Court.
- It also criticizes the 2015 enforcement mechanisms, such as suspending authorities or public employees or handing enforcement to the Government, because it sees them as disguised sanctions that break the balance of powers.
- The bill would remove the prior constitutionality review and the title of the law governing the reinforced enforcement of the Court's rulings, as well as Article 79.
- It restores the earlier wording of several articles: the Court may impose coercive fines of €600 to €3,000 on anyone who fails to comply with its orders, and all public powers must comply with its rulings, with preferent judicial assistance from the courts.
- The law would enter into force the day after its publication in the Official State Gazette.
Who it affects
- The Constitutional Court (Tribunal Constitucional): It would lose the prior constitutionality review and the reinforced enforcement mechanisms for its rulings.
- The Spanish Parliament and regional parliaments: Prior review of Statutes of Autonomy reform bills would be removed.
- Authorities and public employees: They could no longer be suspended by the Court as an enforcement measure, though they could still face coercive fines for non-compliance.
- The Government: It would lose the possibility of being entrusted by the Court with substitute enforcement of its rulings.
Words worth knowing
- Recurso previo de inconstitucionalidad
- Prior constitutionality review: allows an organic bill to be brought before the Constitutional Court before it is passed, to check whether it fits the Constitution.
- Estatuto de Autonomía
- Statute of Autonomy: the basic law of each Spanish autonomous community, passed by Parliament and ratified by referendum.
- Multas coercitivas
- Coercive fines: repeatable fines meant to pressure someone into complying with an order, not to punish a crime.
- Auxilio jurisdiccional
- Judicial assistance: help that courts provide to another body to carry out its decisions.
- Aforamiento
- Special legal protection for certain officials, who can only be tried by specific courts.
It summarizes the text as it was introduced. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries
Where it stands
How far did it get?
It took 3 of 7 steps. It reached Amendments, and today it is unfinished.
- Introduced4 November 2016Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
- Admitted8 November 2016The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
- Amendments30 December 2016Groups propose changes.
- Committeenot reachedA committee goes through the text in detail.
- Plenarynot reachedAll 350 deputies vote.
- Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
- BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 9 official steps on a timeline
20 December 2016
How did the plenary vote?
Voted on: Private member's bill of the Basque Parliamentary Group (EAJ-PNV), Organic bill reforming Organic Law 2/1979, of October 3, on the Constitutional Court.
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 2 of sitting 22· updated 10 Nov
Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.
Your province
How did the deputies from your province vote?
And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.
Or see how most of each province voted
- A Coruña Tie 4 yes · 4 no
- Albacete Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Alicante/Alacant More votes against 5 yes · 7 no
- Almería More votes against 2 yes · 4 no
- Araba/Álava More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no
- Asturias Tie 4 yes · 4 no
- Ávila More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Badajoz Tie 3 yes · 3 no
- Barcelona More votes in favour 21 yes · 7 no
- Bizkaia More votes in favour 7 yes · 1 no
- Burgos Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Cáceres Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Cádiz More votes in favour 5 yes · 4 no
- Cantabria More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- Castellón/Castelló More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- Ceuta More votes against 0 yes · 1 no
- Ciudad Real More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- Córdoba Tie 3 yes · 3 no
- Cuenca More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Gipuzkoa More votes in favour 6 yes · 0 no
- Girona More votes in favour 6 yes · 0 no
- Granada More votes against 3 yes · 4 no
- Guadalajara More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Huelva More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no
- Huesca More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Illes Balears Tie 4 yes · 4 no
- Jaén More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no
- La Rioja Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Las Palmas More votes against 3 yes · 4 no
- León Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Lleida More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no
- Lugo Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Madrid More votes against 15 yes · 19 no
- Málaga More votes against 5 yes · 6 no
- Melilla More votes against 0 yes · 1 no
- Murcia More votes against 3 yes · 7 no
- Navarra More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no
- Ourense More votes against 0 yes · 3 no
- Palencia More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Pontevedra More votes in favour 4 yes · 3 no
- Salamanca More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Santa Cruz de Tenerife More votes against 3 yes · 4 no
- Segovia More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Sevilla More votes in favour 7 yes · 5 no
- Soria Tie 1 yes · 1 no
- Tarragona More votes in favour 4 yes · 2 no
- Teruel More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Toledo Tie 3 yes · 3 no
- Valencia/València Tie 8 yes · 8 no
- Valladolid More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- Zamora More votes against 0 yes · 2 no
- Zaragoza More votes against 3 yes · 4 no
More details: how each group and each province voted
The groups
Who voted in favour and who against?
In favour, most of Socialista, Vasco (EAJ-PNV), Mixto, Gcup-ec-em and GER. Against, most of Ciudadanos and Popular en el Congreso. 2 deputies voted differently from their group.
By province: in 14 most voted in favour; in 24, against.
Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.
- In favour: 14
- Against: 24
- Tie: 14
| Group | Seats | How it voted |
|---|---|---|
| Socialista | 84 | 82 in favour · 2 did not vote |
| Vasco (EAJ-PNV) | 5 | 5 in favour |
| Mixto | 19 | 15 in favour · 2 against · 2 did not vote |
| Ciudadanos | 32 | 32 against |
| Gcup-ec-em | 67 | 67 in favour |
| GER | 9 | 7 in favour · 2 did not vote |
| Popular en el Congreso | 134 | 131 against · 3 did not vote |
What happens next
What happens now?
The legislature ended before it finished. To go on, someone would have to introduce it again in the new Cortes.
It was presented again:
- XIII Legislature, Congreso de los Diputados· Unfinished Bill to strip the Constitutional Court of enforcement powers
- XIV Legislature, Congreso de los Diputados· Unfinished Proposal to strip the Constitutional Court of enforcement powers
- XV Legislature, Congreso de los Diputados· Unfinished Bill to remove powers added to the Constitutional Court in 2015
- XV Legislature, Congreso de los Diputados· Unfinished Organic Private member's bill to amend Organic Law 2/1979, of October 3, on the Constitutional Court.
Presented before in:
- X Legislature, Congreso de los Diputados· Withdrawn Bill would allow early challenges to autonomy statute reforms
Sources
Where does all this come from?
- Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000042
Official title, type, author, dates and stage.
Retrieved 11 November 2026
- Congreso de los Diputados, vote 2 of sitting 22
The count and every seat’s vote.
Retrieved 10 November 2026
- The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
- Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
- We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.