What it is
Bill would allow early challenges to autonomy statute reforms
It is a members’ bill. Introduced by parliamentary groups, the Senate, regional governments or citizens. It was introduced on 24 January 2014. Introduced by: Grupo Parlamentario Socialista.
Official title: Organic Private member's bill to amend Organic Law 2/1979, of October 3, on the Constitutional Court.
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000140· updated 11 Nov
Automatic summary, not yet reviewed
- The bill would bring back the prior unconstitutionality challenge for reforms of autonomy statutes. The goal is to avoid a text approved even by referendum being declared unconstitutional years later.
- The Constitutional Court would take on the prior constitutional review of these reform proposals, and of the prior challenges against them.
- The challenge could be filed within three days of the approved text being published in the Official Gazette of the Cortes Generales. The Court would have six months to rule, with priority over all other pending cases.
- If the Court finds the text constitutional, the process continues, including a referendum if one is required. If it declares it unconstitutional, the Cortes Generales would have to amend or remove the provisions named before moving forward.
Who it affects
- Those with standing to challenge autonomy statutes: They could challenge autonomy statute reforms before the Constitutional Court in the same cases in which they can challenge the statutes themselves.
- Constitutional Court (Tribunal Constitucional): It would have to rule on these challenges within six months and give them priority over other cases.
- Cortes Generales (Spanish Parliament): If the Court declares a text unconstitutional, they would have to amend it or remove the named provisions before continuing.
- Autonomous Communities: Their reform proposals could be challenged before taking effect.
Words worth knowing
- Recurso previo de inconstitucionalidad
- A challenge filed with the Constitutional Court before a rule takes effect, asking it to decide whether the rule complies with the Constitution.
- Estatuto de autonomía
- The basic rule of each Autonomous Community, passed by the Cortes Generales and, in some cases, approved by referendum.
- Proposición de ley
- A bill introduced by a parliamentary group; it is not yet an approved law.
It summarizes the text as it was introduced. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries
Where it stands
How far did it get?
It took 4 of 7 steps. It reached Committee, and today it is withdrawn.
- Introduced24 January 2014Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
- Admitted28 January 2014The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
- Amendments28 February 2014Groups propose changes.
- Committee11 June 2015A committee goes through the text in detail.
- Plenarynot reachedAll 350 deputies vote.
- Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
- BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 12 official steps on a timeline
18 June 2015
How did the plenary vote?
Voted on: Amendment to the whole with alternative text submitted by the Catalan (Convergència i Unió) Parliamentary Group.
This law had 5 votes; this is the latest with every deputy’s vote. See them all
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 35 of sitting 273· updated 10 Nov
Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.
Your province
How did the deputies from your province vote?
And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.
Or see how most of each province voted
- A Coruña More votes against 1 yes · 7 no
- Albacete More votes against 0 yes · 4 no
- Alicante/Alacant More votes against 0 yes · 12 no
- Almería More votes against 0 yes · 5 no
- Araba/Álava Tie 1 yes · 1 no
- Asturias More votes against 1 yes · 5 no
- Ávila More votes against 0 yes · 3 no
- Badajoz More votes against 0 yes · 6 no
- Barcelona More votes against 9 yes · 16 no
- Bizkaia More votes in favour 5 yes · 1 no
- Burgos More votes against 0 yes · 4 no
- Cáceres More votes against 0 yes · 3 no
- Cádiz More votes against 0 yes · 7 no
- Cantabria More votes against 0 yes · 5 no
- Castellón/Castelló More votes against 0 yes · 5 no
- Ceuta More votes against 0 yes · 1 no
- Ciudad Real More votes against 0 yes · 5 no
- Córdoba More votes against 0 yes · 5 no
- Cuenca More votes against 0 yes · 3 no
- Gipuzkoa More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no
- Girona More votes in favour 4 yes · 2 no
- Granada More votes against 0 yes · 5 no
- Guadalajara More votes against 0 yes · 3 no
- Huelva More votes against 0 yes · 3 no
- Huesca More votes against 0 yes · 3 no
- Illes Balears More votes against 0 yes · 8 no
- Jaén More votes against 0 yes · 6 no
- La Rioja More votes against 0 yes · 4 no
- Las Palmas More votes against 0 yes · 6 no
- León More votes against 0 yes · 5 no
- Lleida More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Lugo More votes against 0 yes · 4 no
- Madrid More votes against 3 yes · 28 no
- Málaga More votes against 1 yes · 8 no
- Melilla More votes against 0 yes · 1 no
- Murcia More votes against 0 yes · 10 no
- Navarra More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Ourense More votes against 0 yes · 4 no
- Palencia More votes against 0 yes · 3 no
- Pontevedra More votes against 1 yes · 5 no
- Salamanca More votes against 0 yes · 4 no
- Santa Cruz de Tenerife More votes against 1 yes · 5 no
- Segovia More votes against 0 yes · 3 no
- Sevilla More votes against 1 yes · 9 no
- Soria More votes against 0 yes · 2 no
- Tarragona More votes against 2 yes · 4 no
- Teruel More votes against 0 yes · 1 no
- Toledo More votes against 0 yes · 6 no
- Valencia/València More votes against 1 yes · 13 no · 1 abst.
- Valladolid More votes against 0 yes · 5 no
- Zamora More votes against 0 yes · 3 no
- Zaragoza More votes against 0 yes · 5 no
More details: how each group and each province voted
The groups
Who voted in favour and who against?
In favour, most of Vasco (EAJ-PNV), Mixto, GC-CiU and GIP. Against, most of Socialista, GUPyD and Popular en el Congreso. 2 deputies voted differently from their group.
By province: in 3 most voted in favour; in 48, against.
Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.
- In favour: 3
- Against: 48
- Tie: 1
| Group | Seats | How it voted |
|---|---|---|
| Socialista | 108 | 93 against · 15 did not vote |
| Vasco (EAJ-PNV) | 5 | 5 in favour |
| Mixto | 18 | 9 in favour · 1 against · 1 abst. · 7 did not vote |
| GC-CiU | 16 | 13 in favour · 3 did not vote |
| GIP | 11 | 9 in favour · 2 did not vote |
| GUPyD | 5 | 5 against |
| Popular en el Congreso | 185 | 174 against · 11 did not vote |
What happens next
What happens now?
Whoever introduced it withdrew it, or it was merged into another one. It goes no further.
It was presented again:
- XII Legislature, Congreso de los Diputados· Unfinished Proposal to remove powers added to the Constitutional Court in 2015
- XIII Legislature, Congreso de los Diputados· Unfinished Bill to strip the Constitutional Court of enforcement powers
- XIV Legislature, Congreso de los Diputados· Unfinished Proposal to strip the Constitutional Court of enforcement powers
- XV Legislature, Congreso de los Diputados· Unfinished Bill to remove powers added to the Constitutional Court in 2015
- XV Legislature, Congreso de los Diputados· Unfinished Organic Private member's bill to amend Organic Law 2/1979, of October 3, on the Constitutional Court.
Sources
Where does all this come from?
- Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000140
Official title, type, author, dates and stage.
Retrieved 11 November 2026
- Congreso de los Diputados, vote 35 of sitting 273
The count and every seat’s vote.
Retrieved 10 November 2026
- The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
- Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
- We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.