What it is
Proposal to toughen penalties against illegal occupation of homes
It is a members’ bill. Introduced by parliamentary groups, the Senate, regional governments or citizens. It was introduced on 6 February 2026. Introduced by: Grupo Parlamentario Popular en el Congreso.
Official title: Private member's bill for an Organic Law against the illegal occupation of real estate and for neighborhood coexistence and the protection of the safety of persons and property in owners' associations.
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000254· updated 11 Nov
Automatic summary, not yet reviewed
- The bill would define illegal occupation as holding someone else's property without title or payment, and would state that illegal occupants cannot claim the protection of home or dwelling against public authorities.
- It would raise Criminal Code penalties for those who occupy a property with violence or intimidation (one to three years in prison) or without authorization (six to eighteen months). It would also punish those who promote or mark properties for occupation, and clarify that cutting utilities to an occupied property is not a crime of coercion.
- A judge could order Judicial Police to require occupants to leave within 24 hours or prove a legitimate title. If they do not, the judge would order immediate eviction, with notice to social services if minors or vulnerable people are involved.
- It would extend to all legal entities the ability to request immediate recovery of possession of a home through a fast-track verbal trial, which is currently limited to certain entities.
- Homeowners' communities would get tools against occupants who carry out banned activities, with immediate eviction and compensation, and the community president could alert owners to preventive measures such as boarding up doors or installing anti-occupation systems. Illegal occupation would also not allow municipal registration.
- The Government would have to refund owners the property tax (IBI) and wealth tax paid during the occupation once there is a final court ruling, and would update the municipal registration rules within twelve months. The law would take effect twenty days after publication.
Who it affects
- Owners of homes or properties that are illegally occupied: Could recover their homes faster, with tougher penalties for occupants, and get back property and wealth taxes paid during the occupation.
- Homeowners' communities and their presidents: Could go directly to public authorities against banned activities by an illegal occupant and request immediate eviction and compensation.
- People who occupy properties without title: Would face higher prison terms, and those who promote or mark properties for occupation would be punished as accomplices or instigators.
- Judges, Judicial Police and city councils: Would have to carry out evictions within 24 hours when ordered by a judge and remove illegal occupants from the municipal register.
Words worth knowing
- Usurpación (usurpation)
- The crime of occupying someone else's property or a real estate right without being entitled to it.
- Allanamiento de morada (breaking into a dwelling)
- The crime of entering another person's home against their will or staying there.
- Juicio verbal (verbal trial)
- A fast, simple court procedure for certain claims, such as recovering possession of a home.
- Lanzamiento (eviction)
- The court-ordered physical removal of a person from a property.
- Medidas cautelares (interim measures)
- Early court decisions meant to stop the harm while the case is being resolved.
It summarizes the text as it was introduced. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries
Where it stands
How far did it get?
It took 3 of 7 steps. It reached Amendments, and today it is unfinished.
- Introduced6 February 2026Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
- Admitted10 February 2026The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
- Amendments29 May 2026Groups propose changes.
- Committeenot reachedA committee goes through the text in detail.
- Plenarynot reachedAll 350 deputies vote.
- Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
- BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 9 official steps on a timeline
19 May 2026
How did the plenary vote?
Voted on: Private member's bill by the Popular Group in the Congress, Organic bill against illegal occupation of properties and for neighborhood coexistence and the protection of the safety of persons and things in property communities.
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 1 of sitting 179· updated 10 Nov
Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.
Your province
How did the deputies from your province vote?
And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.
Or see how most of each province voted
- A Coruña Tie 4 yes · 4 no
- Albacete Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Alicante/Alacant More votes in favour 7 yes · 5 no
- Almería More votes in favour 4 yes · 2 no
- Araba/Álava More votes against 1 yes · 2 no · 1 abst.
- Asturias More votes in favour 4 yes · 3 no
- Ávila More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Badajoz More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no
- Barcelona More votes against 7 yes · 22 no · 3 abst.
- Bizkaia More votes against 1 yes · 5 no · 2 abst.
- Burgos Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Cáceres Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Cádiz More votes in favour 5 yes · 4 no
- Cantabria More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no
- Castellón/Castelló More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no
- Ceuta More votes in favour 1 yes · 0 no
- Ciudad Real More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no
- Córdoba Tie 3 yes · 3 no
- Cuenca More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Gipuzkoa More votes against 0 yes · 4 no · 2 abst.
- Girona More votes against 0 yes · 4 no · 2 abst.
- Granada More votes in favour 4 yes · 3 no
- Guadalajara More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Huelva More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no
- Huesca More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Illes Balears Tie 4 yes · 4 no
- Jaén More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no
- La Rioja Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Las Palmas Tie 4 yes · 4 no
- León Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Lleida More votes against 0 yes · 3 no
- Lugo More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no
- Madrid More votes in favour 20 yes · 15 no
- Málaga More votes in favour 7 yes · 4 no
- Melilla More votes in favour 1 yes · 0 no
- Murcia More votes in favour 6 yes · 4 no
- Navarra More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- Ourense More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no
- Palencia More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Pontevedra More votes against 3 yes · 4 no
- Salamanca More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no
- Santa Cruz de Tenerife More votes in favour 4 yes · 3 no
- Segovia More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Sevilla More votes against 5 yes · 6 no
- Soria Tie 1 yes · 1 no
- Tarragona More votes against 1 yes · 4 no · 1 abst.
- Teruel More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Toledo More votes in favour 4 yes · 2 no
- Valencia/València Tie 8 yes · 8 no
- Valladolid More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no
- Zamora More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Zaragoza More votes in favour 4 yes · 3 no
More details: how each group and each province voted
The groups
Who voted in favour and who against?
In favour, most of Popular en el Congreso and VOX. Against, most of Euskal Herria Bildu, Plurinacional SUMAR, Republicano, Socialista and Mixto. 2 deputies voted differently from their group.
By province: in 31 most voted in favour; in 10, against.
Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.
- In favour: 31
- Against: 10
- Tie: 11
| Group | Seats | How it voted |
|---|---|---|
| Euskal Herria Bildu | 6 | 6 against |
| Plurinacional SUMAR | 26 | 26 against |
| Republicano | 7 | 7 against |
| Socialista | 121 | 119 against · 2 did not vote |
| Vasco (EAJ-PNV) | 5 | 5 abst. |
| Junts per Catalunya | 7 | 6 abst. · 1 did not vote |
| Mixto | 8 | 2 in favour · 6 against |
| Popular en el Congreso | 137 | 136 in favour · 1 did not vote |
| VOX | 33 | 33 in favour |
What happens next
What happens now?
The legislature ended before it finished. To go on, someone would have to introduce it again in the new Cortes.
It has not been presented again yet.
Presented before in:
- XII Legislature, Congreso de los Diputados· Unfinished· nearly the same title Bill to toughen penalties for illegally occupying properties
- XIV Legislature, Congreso de los Diputados· Rejected· nearly the same title Bill to quickly evict people who illegally occupy homes
- XIV Legislature, Congreso de los Diputados· Rejected· nearly the same title Bill to evict illegal squatters faster and protect neighbors
Sources
Where does all this come from?
- Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000254
Official title, type, author, dates and stage.
Retrieved 11 November 2026
- Congreso de los Diputados, procedure
The date of each step, with its official wording.
Retrieved 12 November 2026
- Congreso de los Diputados, vote 1 of sitting 179
The count and every seat’s vote.
Retrieved 10 November 2026
- The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
- Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
- We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.