What it is
Bill to evict illegal squatters faster and protect neighbors
It is a members’ bill. Introduced by parliamentary groups, the Senate, regional governments or citizens. It was introduced on 19 August 2022. Introduced by: Grupo Parlamentario Popular en el Congreso.
Official title: Organic Private member's bill against illegal occupation and for neighborhood coexistence and the protection of the safety of persons and things in owners' associations.
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000248· updated 11 Nov
Automatic summary, not yet reviewed
- The bill would provide that someone illegally occupying a property cannot claim the protection of home or dwelling. Once required by the authorities, they would have 24 hours to leave or prove they have a right to be there; otherwise, immediate eviction would follow. In flagrant offenses, eviction would be immediate.
- The bill would toughen the Criminal Code: higher penalties if the occupation lasts more than 15 days, aggravated penalties when an organized group acts, and punishment for anyone promoting occupation by spreading instructions or marking properties.
- The bill would expand who can request the immediate recovery of possession of a home in the summary civil process: not only certain entities, as now, but all natural and legal persons who are legitimate owners or possessors.
- The bill would give homeowners' associations more tools: the president could demand the immediate end of prohibited activities and go to the public authorities without a prior warning when the occupant has no title. It also provides for notifying owners of empty properties at risk of occupation so they can take preventive measures.
- The bill would make illegal occupation no ground for municipal registration: the registration would be null, would not prove residence, and would grant no rights. City councils would remove such registrations on their own initiative or at the owner's request.
- The bill would have the Government refund the owner the amounts paid in property tax (IBI Impuesto sobre Bienes Inmuebles: the municipal property tax paid by owners of apartments and premises.) and wealth tax during the occupation, once there is a final court ruling declaring the occupation illegal, and the occupied home would still count as the owner's usual residence for tax purposes.
Who it affects
- Legitimate owners and possessors of property: Could recover possession faster and get back some taxes paid during the occupation.
- Homeowners' associations: Would have new tools to demand an end to prohibited activities and act against occupants.
- People occupying property without title: Would lose home protection, have 24 hours to leave, and could not register municipally.
- City councils: Would have to remove registrations of illegal occupants on their own initiative.
Words worth knowing
- Lanzamiento
- The physical eviction of someone from a property by court order.
- Delito flagrante
- An offense being committed at that moment or just committed.
- Morada
- A dwelling where a person usually lives; it has stronger criminal protection than other properties.
- IBI
- Impuesto sobre Bienes Inmuebles: the municipal property tax paid by owners of apartments and premises.
- Proposición de ley orgánica
- A bill before the Congress to pass a law affecting fundamental rights; it is not an approved law yet.
It summarizes the text as it was introduced. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries
Where it stands
How far did it get?
It took 2 of 7 steps. It reached Admitted, and today it is rejected.
- Introduced19 August 2022Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
- Admitted25 August 2022The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
- Amendmentsnot reachedGroups propose changes.
- Committeenot reachedA committee goes through the text in detail.
- Plenarynot reachedAll 350 deputies vote.
- Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
- BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 6 official steps on a timeline
29 November 2022
How did the plenary vote?
Voted on: Private member's bill by the Popular Parliamentary Group in the Congress, Organic bill against illegal occupation and for neighborhood coexistence and the protection of the safety of persons and things in property communities.
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 2 of sitting 219· updated 10 Nov
Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.
Your province
How did the deputies from your province vote?
And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.
Or see how most of each province voted
- A Coruña More votes against 3 yes · 5 no
- Albacete Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Alicante/Alacant More votes in favour 7 yes · 5 no
- Almería More votes in favour 4 yes · 2 no
- Araba/Álava More votes against 0 yes · 3 no · 1 abst.
- Asturias More votes against 3 yes · 4 no
- Ávila More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Badajoz Tie 3 yes · 3 no
- Barcelona More votes against 7 yes · 24 no
- Bizkaia More votes against 1 yes · 4 no · 3 abst.
- Burgos Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Cáceres Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Cádiz More votes in favour 5 yes · 4 no
- Cantabria More votes in favour 4 yes · 1 no
- Castellón/Castelló More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- Ceuta More votes in favour 1 yes · 0 no
- Ciudad Real More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no
- Córdoba Tie 3 yes · 3 no
- Cuenca More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Gipuzkoa More votes against 0 yes · 4 no · 2 abst.
- Girona More votes against 0 yes · 5 no
- Granada More votes against 3 yes · 4 no
- Guadalajara More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Huelva More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- Huesca More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Illes Balears Tie 4 yes · 4 no
- Jaén More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- La Rioja Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Las Palmas Tie 4 yes · 4 no
- León Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Lleida More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Lugo Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Madrid More votes in favour 20 yes · 16 no
- Málaga More votes in favour 6 yes · 5 no
- Melilla More votes in favour 1 yes · 0 no
- Murcia More votes in favour 6 yes · 4 no
- Navarra More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- Ourense Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Palencia More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Pontevedra Tie 3 yes · 3 no
- Salamanca More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no
- Santa Cruz de Tenerife More votes in favour 4 yes · 2 no
- Segovia More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Sevilla More votes against 5 yes · 7 no
- Soria Tie 1 yes · 1 no
- Tarragona More votes against 1 yes · 5 no
- Teruel More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Toledo More votes in favour 4 yes · 2 no
- Valencia/València More votes in favour 8 yes · 7 no
- Valladolid More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no
- Zamora More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Zaragoza More votes against 3 yes · 4 no
More details: how each group and each province voted
The groups
Who voted in favour and who against?
In favour, most of Mixto, Ciudadanos, Popular en el Congreso and VOX. Against, most of Euskal Herria Bildu, Republicano, Socialista, Gcup-ec-gc and GPlu. 5 deputies voted differently from their group.
By province: in 21 most voted in favour; in 18, against.
Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.
- In favour: 21
- Against: 18
- Tie: 13
| Group | Seats | How it voted |
|---|---|---|
| Euskal Herria Bildu | 5 | 5 against |
| Republicano | 13 | 12 against · 1 did not vote |
| Socialista | 120 | 119 against · 1 did not vote |
| Vasco (EAJ-PNV) | 6 | 6 abst. |
| Mixto | 11 | 8 in favour · 2 against · 1 did not vote |
| Ciudadanos | 9 | 9 in favour |
| Gcup-ec-gc | 33 | 32 against · 1 did not vote |
| GPlu | 12 | 3 in favour · 8 against · 1 did not vote |
| Popular en el Congreso | 88 | 88 in favour |
| VOX | 52 | 52 in favour |
What happens next
What happens now?
It goes no further. A similar one could be introduced later.
It was presented again:
- XV Legislature, Congreso de los Diputados· Unfinished Bill to quickly evict people who illegally occupy properties
- XV Legislature, Congreso de los Diputados· Unfinished· nearly the same title Proposal to toughen penalties against illegal occupation of homes
- XV Legislature, Senate Organic Private member's bill against illegal occupation and for neighborhood coexistence and the protection of the safety of persons and things in owners' associations.
Presented before in:
- XII Legislature, Congreso de los Diputados· Unfinished Bill to toughen penalties for illegally occupying properties
- XIII Legislature, Congreso de los Diputados· Unfinished Bill to toughen measures against illegal squatting of homes
Sources
Where does all this come from?
- Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000248
Official title, type, author, dates and stage.
Retrieved 11 November 2026
- Congreso de los Diputados, vote 2 of sitting 219
The count and every seat’s vote.
Retrieved 10 November 2026
- The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
- Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
- We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.