What it is
Bill to quickly evict people who illegally occupy homes
It is a members’ bill. Introduced by parliamentary groups, the Senate, regional governments or citizens. It was introduced on 1 July 2020. Introduced by: Grupo Parlamentario Popular en el Congreso.
Official title: Organic Private member's bill against illegal occupation and for neighborhood coexistence and the protection of the safety of persons and things in owners' associations.
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000065· updated 11 Nov
Automatic summary, not yet reviewed
- The bill proposes that someone illegally occupying a property could not claim the protection of dwelling or home. Once required by the authorities, they would have 12 hours to leave or prove a legal title; in flagrant crime cases, eviction would be immediate, and if they prove nothing, immediate removal would follow.
- It toughens the Criminal Code: higher penalties if the occupation lasts more than 15 days, aggravated penalties for organized groups, punishment for those who promote or mark properties to be occupied, and community service or a fine if the occupant returns the property within 48 hours.
- It improves procedural measures: all individuals and legal entities could request the immediate recovery of possession of a home, and home invasion and usurpation crimes would be added to fast-track proceedings.
- It strengthens rules for homeowners' communities: the community could act against prohibited activities, and if the offender is not the owner, the court could order their immediate removal. It also requires the community president to inform the owner of an empty apartment about preventive measures such as boarding up doors or windows.
- Illegal occupation could not be used to register in the municipal census: the registration would be null, would not prove residence, and would grant no rights. City councils would remove such registrations on their own initiative or at the owner's request.
- The Government would have to issue implementing regulations and, within twelve months, update the municipal census regulations to prevent registrations by illegal occupants. The law would take effect twenty days after publication in the official state gazette.
Who it affects
- Legitimate owners and possessors of homes and premises: Could recover possession more quickly, with more judicial and community support.
- Homeowners' communities and their neighbors: Would have tools to act against occupants who disturb coexistence or carry out prohibited activities.
- People occupying properties without title: Would lose dwelling protection, could be evicted within hours, and could not register in the municipal census.
- City councils: Would have to remove census registrations of illegal occupants on their own initiative.
Words worth knowing
- Lanzamiento
- Forced eviction from a home or premises, carried out through the courts.
- Usurpación
- The crime of occupying a property or taking someone else's property right through violence or intimidation.
- Morada
- The dwelling where a person habitually lives, which has special protection against intrusions.
- Título jurídico
- A document or right that legally justifies possession of a property, such as a deed or a contract.
- Padrón municipal
- The city council register listing the residents of a municipality.
It summarizes the text as it was introduced. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries
Where it stands
How far did it get?
It took 2 of 7 steps. It reached Admitted, and today it is rejected.
- Introduced1 July 2020Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
- Admitted14 July 2020The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
- Amendmentsnot reachedGroups propose changes.
- Committeenot reachedA committee goes through the text in detail.
- Plenarynot reachedAll 350 deputies vote.
- Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
- BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 6 official steps on a timeline
16 February 2021
How did the plenary vote?
Voted on: Private member's bill by the Popular Parliamentary Group in the Congress, Organic bill against illegal occupation and for neighborhood coexistence and the protection of the safety of persons and things in property communities.
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 2 of sitting 74· updated 11 Nov
Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.
Your province
How did the deputies from your province vote?
And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.
Or see how most of each province voted
- A Coruña More votes against 3 yes · 5 no
- Albacete Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Alicante/Alacant More votes in favour 7 yes · 5 no
- Almería More votes in favour 4 yes · 2 no
- Araba/Álava More votes against 0 yes · 3 no
- Asturias More votes against 3 yes · 4 no
- Ávila More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Badajoz Tie 3 yes · 3 no
- Barcelona More votes against 6 yes · 22 no · 3 abst.
- Bizkaia Tie 4 yes · 4 no
- Burgos Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Cáceres Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Cádiz More votes in favour 5 yes · 4 no
- Cantabria More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no
- Castellón/Castelló More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- Ceuta More votes in favour 1 yes · 0 no
- Ciudad Real More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no
- Córdoba Tie 3 yes · 3 no
- Cuenca More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Gipuzkoa More votes against 2 yes · 4 no
- Girona More votes against 0 yes · 4 no · 2 abst.
- Granada More votes against 3 yes · 4 no
- Guadalajara More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Huelva More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- Huesca More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Illes Balears Tie 4 yes · 4 no
- Jaén More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- La Rioja Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Las Palmas More votes against 3 yes · 5 no
- León Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Lleida More votes against 0 yes · 3 no · 1 abst.
- Lugo Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Madrid More votes in favour 19 yes · 17 no
- Málaga More votes in favour 6 yes · 5 no
- Melilla More votes in favour 1 yes · 0 no
- Murcia More votes in favour 6 yes · 4 no
- Navarra More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- Ourense Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Palencia More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Pontevedra More votes against 2 yes · 4 no
- Salamanca More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no
- Santa Cruz de Tenerife More votes in favour 4 yes · 3 no
- Segovia More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Sevilla More votes against 5 yes · 7 no
- Soria Tie 1 yes · 1 no
- Tarragona More votes against 0 yes · 5 no · 1 abst.
- Teruel Tie 1 yes · 1 no · 1 abst.
- Toledo More votes in favour 4 yes · 2 no
- Valencia/València More votes in favour 8 yes · 6 no
- Valladolid More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no
- Zamora More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Zaragoza More votes against 3 yes · 4 no
More details: how each group and each province voted
The groups
Who voted in favour and who against?
In favour, most of Vasco (EAJ-PNV), Mixto, Ciudadanos, Popular en el Congreso and VOX. Against, most of Euskal Herria Bildu, Republicano, Socialista and Gcup-ec-gc. 7 deputies voted differently from their group.
By province: in 20 most voted in favour; in 19, against.
Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.
- In favour: 20
- Against: 19
- Tie: 13
| Group | Seats | How it voted |
|---|---|---|
| Euskal Herria Bildu | 5 | 5 against |
| Republicano | 13 | 13 against |
| Socialista | 120 | 120 against |
| Vasco (EAJ-PNV) | 6 | 5 in favour · 1 did not vote |
| Mixto | 9 | 4 in favour · 3 against · 1 abst. · 1 did not vote |
| Ciudadanos | 10 | 9 in favour · 1 did not vote |
| Gcup-ec-gc | 35 | 35 against |
| GPlu | 12 | 3 against · 7 abst. · 2 did not vote |
| Popular en el Congreso | 88 | 87 in favour · 1 did not vote |
| VOX | 52 | 52 in favour |
What happens next
What happens now?
It goes no further. A similar one could be introduced later.
It was presented again:
- XV Legislature, Congreso de los Diputados· Unfinished Bill to quickly evict people who illegally occupy properties
- XV Legislature, Congreso de los Diputados· Unfinished· nearly the same title Proposal to toughen penalties against illegal occupation of homes
- XV Legislature, Senate Organic Private member's bill against illegal occupation and for neighborhood coexistence and the protection of the safety of persons and things in owners' associations.
Presented before in:
- XII Legislature, Congreso de los Diputados· Unfinished Bill to toughen penalties for illegally occupying properties
- XIII Legislature, Congreso de los Diputados· Unfinished Bill to toughen measures against illegal squatting of homes
Sources
Where does all this come from?
- Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000065
Official title, type, author, dates and stage.
Retrieved 11 November 2026
- Congreso de los Diputados, vote 2 of sitting 74
The count and every seat’s vote.
Retrieved 11 November 2026
- The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
- Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
- We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.