Skip to content

Where are you from?

Choose your province and we will tell you how the deputies and senators you elected vote, one by one.

 

We remember it in this browser. If you create an account, we keep it there.

Type a law, a topic, a person or a province.

What it is

Bill proposes repealing crimes that limit freedom of expression

Committee step 4 of 7 · Unfinished

It is a members’ bill. Introduced by parliamentary groups, the Senate, regional governments or citizens. It was introduced on 9 February 2021. Introduced by: Grupo Parlamentario Confederal de Unidas Podemos-En Comú Podem-Galicia en Común.

Official title: Private member's bill for an Organic Law amending Organic Law 10/1995, of November 23, the Penal Code, for the protection of freedom of expression.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000124· updated 11 Nov

Automatic summary, not yet reviewed

  1. The bill would remove from the Criminal Code the crime against religious feelings or public scorn, Article 525. According to the text, criticism of religions through mockery or satire is protected by freedom of expression, while incitement to religious hatred would remain punishable under Article 510.
  2. It would repeal the crimes against the Crown, in Articles 490.3 and 491, that is, insults to the King. The text relies on rulings by the European Court of Human Rights that convicted Spain for violating freedom of expression in cases involving criticism of the monarchy.
  3. It would remove Article 543, which punishes offenses or insults against Spain, its Autonomous Communities or their symbols, such as the flag or the anthem. The text argues that silencing the anthem in a stadium is a legitimate expression, not a crime.
  4. It would repeal Article 504, which punished insults to the Government, to judicial bodies and to the Security Forces, among other institutions. The text argues that institutions must be open to criticism from citizens.
  5. It would remove Article 578, the crime of glorifying terrorism. The text considers it a poorly defined opinion crime that creates legal uncertainty and self-censorship, and notes that other crimes already exist to punish direct provocation of terrorist offenses.
  6. It would protect freedom of expression against abuse by authorities: it creates a new Article 536 bis punishing the identification of people in order to monitor their participation in political, union or religious activities, and adds to Article 538 a penalty for anyone who prevents the right to freedom of expression. It also amends aggravating circumstance 4 of Article 22 to expressly include victims of terrorism among the protected groups.

Who it affects

  • People who criticize institutions, religions or national symbols: They could no longer be convicted for the crimes the bill would repeal, if it is passed.
  • Victims of terrorism: The bill adds their express protection to the aggravating circumstance in Article 22 of the Criminal Code.
  • Authorities and public officials: They could face disqualification and fines if they identify people to monitor their political activity or if they prevent freedom of expression.
  • Artists, Twitter users and rappers: According to the text, they would no longer face the crime of glorifying terrorism for their messages or works.

Words worth knowing

Proposición de ley
A bill introduced by a parliamentary group so it can become law. It is not an approved law until the whole process is finished.
Ley Orgánica (organic law)
A type of law reserved for major matters, such as fundamental rights or reform of the Criminal Code. It needs more votes to pass than an ordinary law.
Derogar (to repeal)
To remove a rule or part of it, so it no longer applies.
Tipo penal (criminal offense definition)
The description of conduct that is a crime and the penalty it carries.
Inhabilitación especial (special disqualification)
A penalty that bars a person from holding a public job or office for a period of time.

It summarizes the text as it was introduced. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries

Where it stands

How far did it get?

It took 4 of 7 steps. It reached Committee, and today it is unfinished.

  1. Introduced9 February 2021Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
  2. Admitted16 February 2021The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
  3. Amendments25 June 2021Groups propose changes.
  4. Committee14 September 2021A committee goes through the text in detail.
  5. Plenarynot reachedAll 350 deputies vote.
  6. Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
  7. BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 11 official steps on a timeline
Mar 2021Jun 2021Sept 2021Dec 2021Mar 2022Jun 2022Sept 2022Dec 2022Mar 202311. 9 February 2021: Presentación22. 16 February 2021: Boletín Oficial de las Cortes Generales Publicación desde 16/02/2021 hasta 19/02/202133. 16 February 2021: Calificación44. 19 February 2021: Gobierno Contestación desde 19/02/2021 hasta 29/03/202155. 29 March 2021: Pleno Toma en consideración desde 29/03/2021 hasta 15/06/202166. 15 June 2021: Mesa del Congreso Acuerdo subsiguiente a la toma en consideración desde 15/06/2021 hasta 22/06/202177. 22 June 2021: Comisión de Justicia Publicación desde 22/06/2021 hasta 25/06/202188. 25 June 2021: Comisión de Justicia Enmiendas desde 25/06/2021 hasta 30/05/202399. 13 September 2021: Comisión de Justicia Mesa - Calificación desde 13/09/2021 hasta 14/09/20211010. 14 September 2021: Comisión de Justicia Debate de totalidad desde 14/09/2021 hasta 30/09/20211111. 30 May 2023: Concluido - (Caducado) desde 30/05/2023 hasta 16/06/2023

30 September 2021

How did the plenary vote?

More votes against 153 yes · 193 no · 2 abst.

Voted on: Vote on the amendment to the whole with alternative text to the Private member's organic bill reforming Organic Law 10/1995, of November 23, of the Penal Code for the protection of freedom of expression, submitted by the Popular Parliamentary Group in the Congress.

This law had 2 votes; this is the latest with every deputy’s vote. See them all

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 8 of sitting 122· updated 11 Nov

Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.

Your province

How did the deputies from your province vote?

And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.

Or see how most of each province voted
More details: how each group and each province voted

The groups

Who voted in favour and who against?

In favour, most of Mixto, Ciudadanos, Popular en el Congreso and VOX. Against, most of Euskal Herria Bildu, Republicano, Socialista, Vasco (EAJ-PNV), Gcup-ec-gc and GPlu. 5 deputies voted differently from their group.

By province: in 19 most voted in favour; in 21, against.

Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.

  • In favour: 19
  • Against: 21
  • Tie: 12
Result by parliamentary group
GroupSeatsHow it voted
Euskal Herria Bildu5
5 against
Republicano13
13 against
Socialista120
120 against
Vasco (EAJ-PNV)6
6 against
Mixto10
4 in favour · 3 against · 2 abst. · 1 did not vote
Ciudadanos9
9 in favour
Gcup-ec-gc35
34 against · 1 did not vote
GPlu12
12 against
Popular en el Congreso88
88 in favour
VOX52
52 in favour

What happens next

What happens now?

The legislature ended before it finished. To go on, someone would have to introduce it again in the new Cortes.

It was presented again:

Presented before in:

Sources

Where does all this come from?

  • The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
  • Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
  • We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.