What it is
Bill proposes repealing crimes that limit freedom of expression
It is a members’ bill. Introduced by parliamentary groups, the Senate, regional governments or citizens. It was introduced on 16 March 2018. Introduced by: Grupo Parlamentario Confederal de Unidos Podemos-En Comú Podem-En Marea.
Official title: Private member's bill for an Organic Law amending Organic Law 10/1995, of November 23, the Penal Code, for the protection of freedom of expression.
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000211· updated 11 Nov
Automatic summary, not yet reviewed
- The bill would remove from the Criminal Code the crimes against religious feelings (Article 525), against the Crown (Articles 490.3 and 491), insults to Spain and its symbols (Article 543), and insults to institutions such as the Government or the courts (Article 504).
- It would also repeal the crime of glorifying terrorism (Article 578), described as a poorly defined crime of opinion that has been applied unevenly to Twitter users, filmmakers and rappers.
- It would rewrite Article 510, on hate crimes, so that only direct incitement to hatred or violence is punished, remove the harsher penalty for using the internet or social media, and set a maximum penalty of 1 year in prison for the less serious case.
- It would add an aggravating factor for crimes committed because the victim is a victim of terrorism, keeping that group protected after repealing Article 578.
- It would create a new Article 536 bis punishing authorities and public officials who identify people to control their participation in political, union or religious activities, and add to Article 538 a penalty for anyone who prevents the right to freedom of expression.
- The Government would be authorized to issue the rules needed to apply the law, which would take effect the day after its publication in the Official State Gazette.
Who it affects
- People who criticize institutions, national symbols or religions: They could no longer be convicted under the crimes those articles define today, if the bill passes.
- People convicted or investigated for glorifying terrorism: The crime would disappear from the Criminal Code.
- Victims of terrorism: A new aggravating factor would apply to crimes committed because of their status as victims.
- Vulnerable groups (by ethnicity, religion, sexual orientation, disability or other reasons): They would remain protected against direct incitement to hatred or violence, with reworked penalties.
- Authorities and public officials: They could be sanctioned for identifying people to control their political activity or for blocking freedom of expression.
Words worth knowing
- Derogar (repeal)
- To remove a rule or article from the law so it no longer applies.
- Tipo penal (criminal offense definition)
- The legal description of conduct considered a crime and the penalty it carries.
- Agravante (aggravating factor)
- A circumstance that makes a crime punishable with a harsher penalty.
- Inhabilitación especial (special disqualification)
- A penalty that bars someone from holding a public office, job or profession for a period of time.
- Proposición de ley orgánica (organic law bill)
- A text filed in Congress to reform a particularly important law, such as the Criminal Code; it is not yet approved.
It summarizes the text as it was introduced. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries
Where it stands
How far did it get?
It took 3 of 7 steps. It reached Amendments, and today it is unfinished.
- Introduced16 March 2018Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
- Admitted20 March 2018The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
- Amendments2 November 2018Groups propose changes.
- Committeenot reachedA committee goes through the text in detail.
- Plenarynot reachedAll 350 deputies vote.
- Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
- BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 9 official steps on a timeline
23 October 2018
How did the plenary vote?
Voted on: Private member's bill for an Organic Law by the Confederal Parliamentary Group of Unidos Podemos-En Comú Podem-En Marea, amending Organic Law 10/1995, of 23 November, of the Penal Code for the protection of freedom of expression.
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 1 of sitting 151· updated 10 Nov
Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.
Your province
How did the deputies from your province vote?
And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.
Or see how most of each province voted
- A Coruña More votes in favour 4 yes · 3 no
- Albacete Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Alicante/Alacant More votes against 5 yes · 7 no
- Almería More votes against 2 yes · 4 no
- Araba/Álava More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no
- Asturias Tie 4 yes · 4 no
- Ávila Tie 1 yes · 1 no
- Badajoz Tie 3 yes · 3 no
- Barcelona More votes in favour 22 yes · 8 no
- Bizkaia More votes in favour 7 yes · 1 no
- Burgos Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Cáceres Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Cádiz More votes in favour 5 yes · 4 no
- Cantabria More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- Castellón/Castelló More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- Ceuta More votes against 0 yes · 1 no
- Ciudad Real More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- Córdoba Tie 3 yes · 3 no
- Cuenca Tie 1 yes · 1 no
- Gipuzkoa More votes in favour 6 yes · 0 no
- Girona More votes in favour 6 yes · 0 no
- Granada More votes against 3 yes · 4 no
- Guadalajara More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Huelva More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no
- Huesca More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Illes Balears Tie 4 yes · 4 no
- Jaén More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no
- La Rioja Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Las Palmas Tie 4 yes · 4 no
- León Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Lleida More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no
- Lugo Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Madrid More votes against 15 yes · 21 no
- Málaga More votes against 5 yes · 6 no
- Melilla More votes against 0 yes · 1 no
- Murcia More votes against 3 yes · 7 no
- Navarra More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no
- Ourense More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Palencia More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Pontevedra More votes in favour 4 yes · 3 no
- Salamanca More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Santa Cruz de Tenerife More votes against 3 yes · 4 no
- Segovia More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Sevilla More votes in favour 7 yes · 5 no
- Soria Tie 1 yes · 1 no
- Tarragona More votes in favour 4 yes · 2 no
- Teruel More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Toledo Tie 3 yes · 3 no
- Valencia/València Tie 8 yes · 8 no
- Valladolid More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- Zamora More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Zaragoza More votes against 3 yes · 4 no
More details: how each group and each province voted
The groups
Who voted in favour and who against?
In favour, most of Socialista, Vasco (EAJ-PNV), Mixto, Gcup-ec-em and GER. Against, most of Ciudadanos and Popular en el Congreso. 3 deputies voted differently from their group.
By province: in 15 most voted in favour; in 21, against.
Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.
- In favour: 15
- Against: 21
- Tie: 16
| Group | Seats | How it voted |
|---|---|---|
| Socialista | 84 | 84 in favour |
| Vasco (EAJ-PNV) | 5 | 5 in favour |
| Mixto | 19 | 16 in favour · 3 against |
| Ciudadanos | 32 | 32 against |
| Gcup-ec-em | 67 | 67 in favour |
| GER | 9 | 8 in favour · 1 did not vote |
| Popular en el Congreso | 134 | 131 against · 3 did not vote |
What happens next
What happens now?
The legislature ended before it finished. To go on, someone would have to introduce it again in the new Cortes.
It was presented again:
- XIV Legislature, Congreso de los Diputados· Unfinished Bill proposes repealing crimes that limit freedom of expression
- XV Legislature, Congreso de los Diputados· Unfinished Bill would repeal crimes that limit freedom of expression
- XV Legislature, Congreso de los Diputados· Withdrawn Private member's bill for an Organic Law amending Organic Law 10/1995, of November 23, the Penal Code, for the protection of freedom of expression.
Sources
Where does all this come from?
- Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000211
Official title, type, author, dates and stage.
Retrieved 11 November 2026
- Congreso de los Diputados, vote 1 of sitting 151
The count and every seat’s vote.
Retrieved 10 November 2026
- The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
- Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
- We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.