What it is
Bill would repeal crimes that limit freedom of expression
Committee step 4 of 7· LapsedIt is a members’ bill. Introduced by parliamentary groups, the Senate, regional governments or citizens. It was introduced on 22 September 2023. Introduced by: Grupo Parlamentario Plurinacional SUMAR.
Official title: Private member's bill for an Organic Law amending Organic Law 10/1995, of November 23, the Penal Code, for the protection of freedom of expression.
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000006· updated 11 Nov
Automatic summary, not yet reviewed
- The bill would remove from the Criminal Code the crimes against religious feelings (Article 525), against the Crown (Articles 490.3 and 491), offenses against Spain and its symbols (Article 543), insults to institutions and security forces (Article 504), and glorification of terrorism (Article 578).
- The explanatory statement argues that these crimes have been used to punish criticism, satire or protest, and that freedom of expression should prevail unless there is direct incitement to violence, hatred or discrimination.
- The bill would reform the fourth aggravating circumstance of Article 22 so that attacking a person for being a victim of terrorism counts as an aggravating factor, keeping victims protected even though Article 578 would be repealed.
- It would create a new Article 536 bis, punishing with disqualification from public office and a fine any authority or public official who identifies people outside the legal grounds in order to know or control their participation in political, union, religious or expression activities.
- It would add a second paragraph to Article 538 to punish any authority or public official who, outside the cases allowed by law, prevents one or more people from exercising freedom of expression.
- The law would take effect the day after its publication in the Official State Gazette, and the Government would be empowered to issue the rules needed to apply it.
Words worth knowing
- Derogar (repeal)
- To remove a rule or article from the law so it no longer applies.
- Tipo penal (criminal offense definition)
- The legal description of conduct that the law punishes as a crime.
- Agravante (aggravating circumstance)
- A factor that makes a crime punishable more severely.
- Inhabilitación especial (special disqualification)
- A penalty that bars a person from holding a public job or office for a period of time.
- Proposición de ley (bill)
- A legislative proposal introduced by members of Congress that still needs to be debated and passed.
It summarizes the text as it was introduced. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries
Where it stands
How far did it get?
It took 4 of 7 steps. It reached Committee, and today it is lapsed.
- Introduced22 September 2023Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
- Admitted26 September 2023The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
- Amendments12 January 2024Groups propose changes.
- Committee10 July 2026A committee goes through the text in detail.
- Plenarynot reachedAll 350 deputies vote.
- Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
- BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 12 official steps on a timeline
14 July 2026
How did the plenary vote?
Voted on: Amendment to the whole of alternative text submitted by the Popular Parliamentary Group in the Congress.
This law had 3 votes; this is the latest with every deputy’s vote. See them all
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 56 of sitting 192· updated 10 Nov
Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.
Your province
How did the deputies from your province vote?
And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.
Or see how most of each province voted
- A Coruña Tie 4 yes · 4 no
- Albacete Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Alicante/Alacant More votes in favour 7 yes · 5 no
- Almería More votes in favour 4 yes · 2 no
- Araba/Álava More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Asturias More votes in favour 4 yes · 3 no
- Ávila More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Badajoz More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no
- Barcelona More votes against 7 yes · 25 no
- Bizkaia More votes against 1 yes · 7 no
- Burgos Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Cáceres Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Cádiz More votes in favour 5 yes · 4 no
- Cantabria More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no
- Castellón/Castelló More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no
- Ceuta More votes in favour 1 yes · 0 no
- Ciudad Real More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no
- Córdoba Tie 3 yes · 3 no
- Cuenca More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Gipuzkoa More votes against 0 yes · 6 no
- Girona More votes against 0 yes · 6 no
- Granada More votes in favour 4 yes · 3 no
- Guadalajara More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Huelva More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no
- Huesca More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Illes Balears Tie 4 yes · 4 no
- Jaén More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no
- La Rioja Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Las Palmas Tie 4 yes · 4 no
- León Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Lleida More votes against 0 yes · 4 no
- Lugo More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no
- Madrid More votes in favour 21 yes · 16 no
- Málaga More votes in favour 7 yes · 4 no
- Melilla More votes in favour 1 yes · 0 no
- Murcia More votes in favour 6 yes · 4 no
- Navarra More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- Ourense More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no
- Palencia More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Pontevedra More votes against 3 yes · 4 no
- Salamanca More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no
- Santa Cruz de Tenerife More votes against 3 yes · 4 no
- Segovia More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Sevilla More votes against 5 yes · 7 no
- Soria Tie 1 yes · 1 no
- Tarragona More votes against 1 yes · 4 no
- Teruel More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Toledo More votes in favour 4 yes · 2 no
- Valencia/València Tie 8 yes · 8 no
- Valladolid More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no
- Zamora More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Zaragoza More votes in favour 4 yes · 3 no
More details: how each group and each province voted
The groups
Who voted in favour and who against?
In favour, most of Popular en el Congreso and VOX. Against, most of Euskal Herria Bildu, Plurinacional SUMAR, Republicano, Socialista, Vasco (EAJ-PNV), Junts per Catalunya and Mixto. 1 deputy voted differently from their group.
By province: in 30 most voted in favour; in 11, against.
Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.
- In favour: 30
- Against: 11
- Tie: 11
| Group | Seats | How it voted |
|---|---|---|
| Euskal Herria Bildu | 6 | 6 against |
| Plurinacional SUMAR | 26 | 26 against |
| Republicano | 7 | 6 against · 1 did not vote |
| Socialista | 121 | 121 against |
| Vasco (EAJ-PNV) | 5 | 5 against |
| Junts per Catalunya | 7 | 7 against |
| Mixto | 8 | 1 in favour · 7 against |
| Popular en el Congreso | 137 | 137 in favour |
| VOX | 33 | 33 in favour |
What happens next
What happens now?
The legislature ended before it finished. To go on, someone would have to introduce it again in the new Cortes.
Sources
Where does all this come from?
- Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000006
Official title, type, author, dates and stage.
Retrieved 11 November 2026
- Congreso de los Diputados, procedure
The date of each step, with its official wording.
Retrieved 12 November 2026
- Congreso de los Diputados, vote 56 of sitting 192
The count and every seat’s vote.
Retrieved 10 November 2026
- The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
- Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
- We never say “passed” because of a vote: the files do not say which majority was needed.