13 December 2012, in the Congreso

Reform of the Coastal Law: longer concessions and more legal certainty

More votes against 145 yes · 182 no

More votes against: 182 no and 145 yes, a margin of 37. 23 did not vote.

BOE step 7 of 7 · Passed Government bill for the protection and sustainable use of the coastline and amending Law 22/1988, of July 28, on the Coast.

When we cannot be sure which majority was needed, we do not say whether this means it “passed”: the official file does not say.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 9 of sitting 77· updated 10 Nov

The chamber

Who voted how?

145 in favour, 182 against. 23 did not vote. 3 voted differently from their group.

Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.

Your province

How did the deputies from your province vote?

Or see how most of each province voted

The groups

How did each group vote?

In favour, most of Socialista, Vasco (EAJ-PNV), Mixto, GC-CiU, GIP and GUPyD. Against, most of Popular en el Congreso.

Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.

In favour: 9
Against: 37
Tie: 6

Result by parliamentary group
Group	Seats	How it voted
Socialista	110	99 in favour · 1 against · 10 did not vote
Vasco (EAJ-PNV)	5	5 in favour
Mixto	18	15 in favour · 2 against · 1 did not vote
GC-CiU	16	12 in favour · 4 did not vote
GIP	11	9 in favour · 2 did not vote
GUPyD	5	5 in favour
Popular en el Congreso	185	179 against · 6 did not vote

Sources

Where does all this come from?

Official wording of what was voted on: Solicitud del Grupo Parlamentario Socialista de avocación por el Pleno del Proyecto de Ley de protección y uso sostenible del litoral y de modificación de la Ley 22/1988, de 28 de julio, de Costas.

Congreso de los Diputados, vote 9 of sitting 77
The count and every seat’s vote.

Retrieved 10 November 2026

The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.

Read the full method · Report an error