29 May 2014, in the Congreso

Remaining Proposals

More votes against 139 yes · 168 no

More votes against: 168 no and 139 yes, a margin of 29. 43 did not vote.

Admitted step 2 of 7 Report on the state, functioning and activities of the General Council of the Judiciary and the Courts and Tribunals of Justice, as well as the Report of the Supreme Court, corresponding to the year 2012.

When we cannot be sure which majority was needed, we do not say whether this means it “passed”: the official file does not say.

The chamber

Who voted how?

139 in favour, 168 against. 43 did not vote. 2 voted differently from their group.

Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.

Your province

Or see how most of each province voted

The groups

In favour, most of Socialista, Vasco (EAJ-PNV), Mixto, GC-CiU, GIP and GUPyD. Against, most of Popular en el Congreso.

Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.

Result by parliamentary group
Group	Seats	How it voted
Socialista	110	97 in favour · 13 did not vote
Vasco (EAJ-PNV)	5	5 in favour
Mixto	18	6 in favour · 12 did not vote
GC-CiU	16	13 in favour · 3 did not vote
GIP	11	11 in favour
GUPyD	5	5 in favour
Popular en el Congreso	185	2 in favour · 168 against · 15 did not vote

Sources

Official wording of what was voted on: Resto de Propuestas

Congreso de los Diputados, vote 34 of sitting 191
The count and every seat’s vote.

Retrieved 10 November 2026

The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.