Skip to content

Where are you from?

Choose your province and we will tell you how the deputies and senators you elected vote, one by one.

 

We remember it in this browser. If you create an account, we keep it there.
Sign in

Type a law, a topic, a person or a province.

What it is

Report on the state, functioning and activities of the General Council of the Judiciary and the Courts and Tribunals of Justice, as well as the Report of the Supreme Court, corresponding to the year 2012.

Admitted step 2 of 7

Type of initiative: . It was introduced on 25 March 2014. Introduced by: Consejo General del Poder Judicial.

Follow

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 245/000004· updated 11 Nov

We do not have a summary of this text yet, so we do not tell you what it changes: only what the official page says. Read the official page

Where it stands

How far did it get?

It took 1 of 7 steps. It reached Admitted.

  1. Introduced25 March 2014Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
  2. Admitted1 April 2014The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
  3. Amendmentsnot reachedGroups propose changes.
  4. Committeenot reachedA committee goes through the text in detail.
  5. Plenarynot reachedAll 350 deputies vote.
  6. Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
  7. BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 2 official steps on a timeline
Mar 201411. 25 March 2014: Presentación22. 1 April 2014: Calificación

29 May 2014

How did the plenary vote?

More votes against 137 yes · 170 no

Voted on: Remaining Proposals

This law had 44 votes; this is the latest with every deputy’s vote. See them all

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 55 of sitting 191· updated 10 Nov

Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.

Your province

How did the deputies from your province vote?

And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.

Or see how most of each province voted
More details: how each group and each province voted

The groups

Who voted in favour and who against?

In favour, most of Socialista, Vasco (EAJ-PNV), Mixto, GC-CiU, GIP and GUPyD. Against, most of Popular en el Congreso.

By province: in 8 most voted in favour; in 37, against.

Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.

  • In favour: 8
  • Against: 37
  • Tie: 7
Result by parliamentary group
GroupSeatsHow it voted
Socialista110
97 in favour · 13 did not vote
Vasco (EAJ-PNV)5
5 in favour
Mixto18
6 in favour · 12 did not vote
GC-CiU16
14 in favour · 2 did not vote
GIP11
10 in favour · 1 did not vote
GUPyD5
5 in favour
Popular en el Congreso185
170 against · 15 did not vote

What happens next

What happens now?

Groups can now table amendments: proposed changes to the text.

Sources

Where does all this come from?

  • The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
  • Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
  • We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.

Read the full method · Report an error