What it is
Government bill amending Law 12/2013, of August 2, on measures to improve the functioning of the food chain.
No stage no dataIt is a government bill. Introduced by the Government.
Source: Senate, file 621/000032· updated 11 Nov
We do not have a summary of this text yet, so we do not tell you what it changes: only what the official page says. Read the official page
Where it stands
How far did it get?
It took 0 of 7 steps. Its stage is not on record.
- Introducednot reachedSomeone registers the text in the Congreso.
- Admittednot reachedThe Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
- Amendmentsnot reachedGroups propose changes.
- Committeenot reachedA committee goes through the text in detail.
- Plenarynot reachedAll 350 deputies vote.
- Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
- BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
18 November 2021
How did the plenary vote?
Voted on: Government bill amending Law 12/2013, of August 2, on measures to improve the functioning of the food chain.
This law had 56 votes; this is the latest with every deputy’s vote. See them all
Source: Senate, vote 146 of sitting 40· updated 11 Nov
Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.
Your province
How did the deputies from your province vote?
And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.
Or see how most of each province voted
- A Coruña No data
- Albacete No data
- Alicante/Alacant No data
- Almería No data
- Araba/Álava No data
- Asturias No data
- Ávila No data
- Badajoz No data
- Barcelona No data
- Bizkaia No data
- Burgos No data
- Cáceres No data
- Cádiz No data
- Cantabria No data
- Castellón/Castelló No data
- Ceuta No data
- Ciudad Real No data
- Córdoba No data
- Cuenca No data
- Gipuzkoa No data
- Girona No data
- Granada More votes in favour 1 yes · 0 no
- Guadalajara No data
- Huelva No data
- Huesca No data
- Illes Balears No data
- Jaén No data
- La Rioja No data
- Las Palmas No data
- León No data
- Lleida No data
- Lugo No data
- Madrid More votes against 0 yes · 1 no
- Málaga No data
- Melilla More votes in favour 1 yes · 0 no
- Murcia No count 0 yes · 0 no
- Navarra No data
- Ourense No data
- Palencia No data
- Pontevedra No data
- Salamanca No data
- Santa Cruz de Tenerife More votes in favour 1 yes · 0 no
- Segovia More votes in favour 1 yes · 0 no
- Sevilla No data
- Soria No data
- Tarragona No data
- Teruel No data
- Toledo No data
- Valencia/València More votes in favour 1 yes · 0 no
- Valladolid No data
- Zamora No data
- Zaragoza No data
More details: how each group and each province voted
The groups
Who voted in favour and who against?
Against, most of Socialista. 3 deputies voted differently from their group.
By province: in 5 most voted in favour; in 1, against.
Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.
- In favour: 5
- Against: 1
| Group | Seats | How it voted |
|---|---|---|
| Socialista | 8 | 3 in favour · 4 against · 1 did not vote |
| Popular en el Senado | 7 | 3 in favour · 3 abst. · 1 did not vote |
What happens next
What happens now?
The Congreso has not yet published which stage it is at.
It was presented again:
- XV Legislature, Congreso de los Diputados· Withdrawn Private member's bill amending Law 12/2013, of 2 August, on measures to improve the functioning of the food chain.
- XV Legislature, Congreso de los Diputados· Unfinished Bill would ban selling food at a loss and protect farmer prices
The same initiative in the other chamber:
- XIV Legislature, Congreso de los Diputados· Passed Stronger protection for farmers in the Spanish food supply chain
Sources
Where does all this come from?
- Senate, file 621/000032
Official title, type, author, dates and stage.
Retrieved 11 November 2026
- Senate, vote 146 of sitting 40
The count and every seat’s vote.
Retrieved 11 November 2026
- The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
- Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
- We never say “passed” because of a vote: the files do not say which majority was needed.