What it is
Bill would ban selling food at a loss and protect farmer prices
Amendments step 3 of 7· LapsedIt is a members’ bill. Introduced by parliamentary groups, the Senate, regional governments or citizens. It was introduced on 6 March 2024. Introduced by: Grupo Parlamentario Republicano.
Official title: Private member's bill amending Law 12/2013, of 2 August, on measures to improve the functioning of the food chain.
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000064· updated 11 Nov
Automatic summary, not yet reviewed
- The bill responds to farmer protests. Farmers say the current Food Chain Law has failed to ensure that the prices they receive cover their production costs.
- The bill would ban reselling at a loss in the food chain: anyone who buys an agricultural or food product could not sell it below its cost, including fixed and variable marketing costs. Producers who sell directly to consumers are exempt.
- The price paid to a primary producer would have to be higher than the producer's total production costs, which are listed: seeds, fertilizers, fuel, machinery, labor and other expenses.
- A company with an 8% market share would be considered to hold a dominant position in the food chain, allowing sanctions for abusive practices under the Competition Defense Law.
- Official standards for average production costs would be created, with mandatory statistical data from operators. Until the ministry sets the coefficients, an initial 10% coefficient would apply.
- The food contract registry would be simplified: the buyer would have three months (or one month for one-off deliveries) to register the contract, instead of the current immediate registration.
Who it affects
- Farmers and livestock breeders: Their prices would have to at least cover production costs, with official cost standards as a reference for negotiating contracts.
- Cooperatives and associative entities: They would gain more negotiating power, and their costs would count when calculating production costs.
- Food industry and retailers: They could not resell products at a loss, and would have to register contracts and provide statistical data.
- Companies with large market shares: From an 8% market share they would be considered dominant and could be sanctioned for abusive practices.
Words worth knowing
- Reventa a pérdidas (reselling at a loss)
- Selling a product bought from someone else for less than it cost to buy and market it.
- Posición dominante (dominant position)
- A situation where a company has enough economic power to act almost independently of competitors, customers or consumers.
- Precio en origen (farm-gate price)
- The money the farmer receives for the product when delivering it, before it reaches industry or retail.
- Proposición de ley (bill)
- A text proposed by a parliamentary group; it is not a law until approved by the Congress and the Senate.
It summarizes the text as it was introduced. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries
Where it stands
How far did it get?
It took 3 of 7 steps. It reached Amendments, and today it is lapsed.
- Introduced6 March 2024Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
- Admitted12 March 2024The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
- Amendments31 May 2024Groups propose changes.
- Committeenot reachedA committee goes through the text in detail.
- Plenarynot reachedAll 350 deputies vote.
- Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
- BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 9 official steps on a timeline
21 May 2024
How did the plenary vote?
Voted on: Private member's bill by the Republican Parliamentary Group, amending Law 12/2013, of August 2, on measures to improve the functioning of the food chain.
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 1 of sitting 38· updated 10 Nov
Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.
Your province
How did the deputies from your province vote?
And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.
Or see how most of each province voted
- A Coruña More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no · 4 abst.
- Albacete More votes in favour 2 yes · 0 no · 2 abst.
- Alicante/Alacant More votes in favour 5 yes · 0 no · 7 abst.
- Almería More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no · 3 abst.
- Araba/Álava More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no · 1 abst.
- Asturias More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no · 4 abst.
- Ávila More votes in favour 1 yes · 0 no · 2 abst.
- Badajoz More votes in favour 2 yes · 0 no · 3 abst.
- Barcelona More votes in favour 24 yes · 0 no · 7 abst.
- Bizkaia More votes in favour 7 yes · 0 no · 1 abst.
- Burgos More votes in favour 2 yes · 0 no · 2 abst.
- Cáceres More votes in favour 2 yes · 0 no · 2 abst.
- Cádiz More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no · 5 abst.
- Cantabria More votes in favour 2 yes · 0 no · 3 abst.
- Castellón/Castelló More votes in favour 2 yes · 0 no · 3 abst.
- Ceuta Tie 0 yes · 0 no · 1 abst.
- Ciudad Real More votes in favour 2 yes · 0 no · 3 abst.
- Córdoba More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no · 3 abst.
- Cuenca More votes in favour 1 yes · 0 no · 2 abst.
- Gipuzkoa More votes in favour 5 yes · 0 no
- Girona More votes in favour 6 yes · 0 no
- Granada More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no · 3 abst.
- Guadalajara More votes in favour 1 yes · 0 no · 2 abst.
- Huelva More votes in favour 2 yes · 0 no · 3 abst.
- Huesca More votes in favour 1 yes · 0 no · 2 abst.
- Illes Balears More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no · 4 abst.
- Jaén More votes in favour 2 yes · 0 no · 3 abst.
- La Rioja More votes in favour 2 yes · 0 no · 2 abst.
- Las Palmas More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no · 4 abst.
- León More votes in favour 2 yes · 0 no · 2 abst.
- Lleida More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no
- Lugo More votes in favour 1 yes · 0 no · 3 abst.
- Madrid More votes in favour 13 yes · 0 no · 19 abst.
- Málaga More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no · 7 abst.
- Melilla Tie 0 yes · 0 no · 1 abst.
- Murcia More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no · 6 abst.
- Navarra More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no · 2 abst.
- Ourense More votes in favour 1 yes · 0 no · 3 abst.
- Palencia More votes in favour 1 yes · 0 no · 2 abst.
- Pontevedra More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no · 3 abst.
- Salamanca More votes in favour 1 yes · 0 no · 3 abst.
- Santa Cruz de Tenerife More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no · 3 abst.
- Segovia More votes in favour 1 yes · 0 no · 2 abst.
- Sevilla More votes in favour 7 yes · 0 no · 5 abst.
- Soria More votes in favour 1 yes · 0 no · 1 abst.
- Tarragona More votes in favour 5 yes · 0 no · 1 abst.
- Teruel More votes in favour 1 yes · 0 no · 2 abst.
- Toledo More votes in favour 2 yes · 0 no · 4 abst.
- Valencia/València More votes in favour 8 yes · 0 no · 8 abst.
- Valladolid More votes in favour 2 yes · 0 no · 3 abst.
- Zamora More votes in favour 1 yes · 0 no · 2 abst.
- Zaragoza More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no · 4 abst.
More details: how each group and each province voted
The groups
Who voted in favour and who against?
In favour, most of Euskal Herria Bildu, Plurinacional SUMAR, Republicano, Socialista, Vasco (EAJ-PNV), Junts per Catalunya and Mixto. 2 deputies voted differently from their group.
By province: in 11 most voted in favour; in 0, against.
Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.
- In favour: 11
- Against: 0
- Abstained: 28
- Tie: 13
| Group | Seats | How it voted |
|---|---|---|
| Euskal Herria Bildu | 6 | 6 in favour |
| Plurinacional SUMAR | 27 | 25 in favour · 2 did not vote |
| Republicano | 7 | 7 in favour |
| Socialista | 120 | 118 in favour · 2 did not vote |
| Vasco (EAJ-PNV) | 5 | 4 in favour · 1 did not vote |
| Junts per Catalunya | 7 | 7 in favour |
| Mixto | 8 | 7 in favour · 1 abst. |
| Popular en el Congreso | 137 | 134 abst. · 3 did not vote |
| VOX | 33 | 1 in favour · 32 abst. |
What happens next
What happens now?
The legislature ended before it finished. To go on, someone would have to introduce it again in the new Cortes.
Sources
Where does all this come from?
- Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000064
Official title, type, author, dates and stage.
Retrieved 11 November 2026
- Congreso de los Diputados, procedure
The date of each step, with its official wording.
Retrieved 12 November 2026
- Congreso de los Diputados, vote 1 of sitting 38
The count and every seat’s vote.
Retrieved 10 November 2026
- The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
- Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
- We never say “passed” because of a vote: the files do not say which majority was needed.