What it is
Bill would require proof of title to register as a resident
It is a members’ bill. Introduced by parliamentary groups, the Senate, regional governments or citizens. It was introduced on 21 December 2023. Introduced by: Grupo Parlamentario VOX.
Official title: Private member's bill amending Law 7/1985, of 2 April, Regulating the Bases of the Local Regime, with the aim of modifying the municipal census in cases of occupation and illegal immigration.
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000039· updated 11 Nov
Automatic summary, not yet reviewed
- The bill, introduced by the VOX parliamentary group, would amend Law 7/1985 so that anyone seeking municipal registration for a property must provide valid title to the home or the authorization of the owner who holds it with valid title.
- It also proposes that, when a person is staying in Spain illegally, that situation be expressly recorded in the municipal register.
- Registrations made without valid title or the owner's authorization would be null from the outset: they would not prove residence and would grant no rights to someone occupying a home without title.
- The law would take effect the day after its publication in the Official State Gazette, and it is issued under State powers over basic equality guarantees and the legal framework of public administrations.
Who it affects
- People occupying homes without title: They could not register in the occupied property or benefit from resident rights.
- Foreign nationals in an irregular situation: Their registration would expressly record their illegal status.
- Property owners: They could control who registers in their homes through their authorization.
- Town councils: They would have to require the new data and titles when registering residents.
Words worth knowing
- Padrón municipal
- The municipal register where the town council records the people living in the municipality.
- Justo título
- Spanish for 'valid title': a document showing you have the right to use the home, such as a deed or a lease.
- Nula de pleno derecho
- Spanish for 'null from the outset': the registration has no legal value from the start, with no court ruling needed.
- Exposición de motivos
- The opening section of a bill explaining why it is proposed.
It summarizes the text as it was introduced. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries
Where it stands
How far did it get?
It took 2 of 7 steps. It reached Admitted, and today it is rejected.
- Introduced21 December 2023Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
- Admitted9 January 2024The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
- Amendmentsnot reachedGroups propose changes.
- Committeenot reachedA committee goes through the text in detail.
- Plenarynot reachedAll 350 deputies vote.
- Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
- BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 6 official steps on a timeline
18 February 2025
How did the plenary vote?
Voted on: Private member's bill from the VOX Parliamentary Group, amending Law 7/1985, of April 2, regulating the basic regime of local government, in order to modify the municipal register in cases of occupation and illegal immigration.
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 2 of sitting 92· updated 10 Nov
Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.
Your province
How did the deputies from your province vote?
And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.
Or see how most of each province voted
- A Coruña More votes in favour 4 yes · 3 no
- Albacete Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Alicante/Alacant More votes in favour 7 yes · 5 no
- Almería More votes in favour 4 yes · 2 no
- Araba/Álava More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Asturias More votes in favour 4 yes · 3 no
- Ávila More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Badajoz More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no
- Barcelona More votes against 7 yes · 25 no
- Bizkaia More votes against 1 yes · 7 no
- Burgos Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Cáceres Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Cádiz More votes in favour 5 yes · 4 no
- Cantabria More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no
- Castellón/Castelló More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no
- Ceuta More votes in favour 1 yes · 0 no
- Ciudad Real More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no
- Córdoba Tie 3 yes · 3 no
- Cuenca More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no
- Gipuzkoa More votes against 0 yes · 6 no
- Girona More votes against 0 yes · 6 no
- Granada More votes in favour 4 yes · 3 no
- Guadalajara More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Huelva More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no
- Huesca More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Illes Balears Tie 4 yes · 4 no
- Jaén More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no
- La Rioja Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Las Palmas Tie 4 yes · 4 no
- León Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Lleida More votes against 0 yes · 4 no
- Lugo More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Madrid More votes in favour 20 yes · 14 no
- Málaga More votes in favour 7 yes · 4 no
- Melilla More votes in favour 1 yes · 0 no
- Murcia More votes in favour 6 yes · 4 no
- Navarra More votes against 1 yes · 4 no
- Ourense More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no
- Palencia More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Pontevedra More votes against 3 yes · 4 no
- Salamanca More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no
- Santa Cruz de Tenerife More votes against 3 yes · 4 no
- Segovia More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Sevilla More votes against 5 yes · 6 no
- Soria Tie 1 yes · 1 no
- Tarragona More votes against 1 yes · 5 no
- Teruel More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Toledo More votes in favour 4 yes · 2 no
- Valencia/València More votes in favour 8 yes · 7 no
- Valladolid More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no
- Zamora More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Zaragoza More votes in favour 4 yes · 3 no
More details: how each group and each province voted
The groups
Who voted in favour and who against?
In favour, most of Popular en el Congreso and VOX. Against, most of Euskal Herria Bildu, Plurinacional SUMAR, Republicano, Socialista, Vasco (EAJ-PNV), Junts per Catalunya and Mixto. 1 deputy voted differently from their group.
By province: in 32 most voted in favour; in 11, against.
Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.
- In favour: 32
- Against: 11
- Tie: 9
| Group | Seats | How it voted |
|---|---|---|
| Euskal Herria Bildu | 6 | 6 against |
| Plurinacional SUMAR | 27 | 26 against · 1 did not vote |
| Republicano | 7 | 7 against |
| Socialista | 120 | 1 in favour · 117 against · 2 did not vote |
| Vasco (EAJ-PNV) | 5 | 5 against |
| Junts per Catalunya | 7 | 7 against |
| Mixto | 8 | 6 against · 2 did not vote |
| Popular en el Congreso | 137 | 135 in favour · 2 did not vote |
| VOX | 33 | 33 in favour |
What happens next
What happens now?
It goes no further. A similar one could be introduced later.
Presented before in:
- XIV Legislature, Congreso de los Diputados· Rejected Bill would require proof of title to register as resident
Sources
Where does all this come from?
- Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000039
Official title, type, author, dates and stage.
Retrieved 11 November 2026
- Congreso de los Diputados, procedure
The date of each step, with its official wording.
Retrieved 12 November 2026
- Congreso de los Diputados, vote 2 of sitting 92
The count and every seat’s vote.
Retrieved 10 November 2026
- The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
- Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
- We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.