Skip to content

Where are you from?

Choose your province and we will tell you how the deputies and senators you elected vote, one by one.

 

We remember it in this browser. If you create an account, we keep it there.

Type a law, a topic, a person or a province.

What it is

Bill would require proof of title to register as resident

Admitted step 2 of 7 · Rejected

It is a members’ bill. Introduced by parliamentary groups, the Senate, regional governments or citizens. It was introduced on 17 October 2022. Introduced by: Grupo Parlamentario VOX.

Official title: Private member's bill amending Law 7/1985, of 2 April, Regulating the Bases of the Local Regime, with the aim of modifying the municipal census in cases of occupation and illegal immigration.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000262· updated 11 Nov

Automatic summary, not yet reviewed

  1. The bill, introduced by the VOX parliamentary group, would amend Law 7/1985 so that anyone seeking to register in the municipal register for a property must provide proof of title to the home or the owner's authorization. It would also expressly record in the register the situation of people living illegally in Spain.
  2. The bill would make registrations in the municipal register made without title or the owner's authorization null from the start. Such registrations would not count as proof of residence and would grant no rights.
  3. The law would take effect the day after its publication in the Official State Gazette (Boletín Oficial del Estado), and is issued under state powers over basic equality for Spaniards and the legal framework of public administrations.

Who it affects

  • People occupying homes without permission: they could not register without title or the owner's authorization.: restriction
  • Foreigners in an irregular situation: their status would be expressly recorded in the register.: restriction
  • Property owners: they could require that registration include their authorization.: protection
  • City councils: they would have to apply the new registration requirements.: obligation

Words worth knowing

Padrón municipal
The municipal register where each city council records the people living in its municipality.
Justo título
Spanish term for a document proving the right to use or own a home, such as a deed or a lease.
Nula de pleno derecho
Null from the start, with no need for a court to declare it so.
Exposición de motivos
The opening section of a bill explaining why it is proposed.

It summarizes the text as it was introduced. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries

Where it stands

How far did it get?

It took 2 of 7 steps. It reached Admitted, and today it is rejected.

  1. Introduced17 October 2022Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
  2. Admitted26 October 2022The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
  3. Amendmentsnot reachedGroups propose changes.
  4. Committeenot reachedA committee goes through the text in detail.
  5. Plenarynot reachedAll 350 deputies vote.
  6. Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
  7. BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 6 official steps on a timeline
Oct 2022Nov 202211. 17 October 2022: Presentación22. 26 October 2022: Boletín Oficial de las Cortes Generales Publicación desde 26/10/2022 hasta 28/10/202233. 26 October 2022: Calificación44. 28 October 2022: Gobierno Contestación desde 28/10/2022 hasta 07/12/202255. 7 December 2022: Pleno Toma en consideración desde 07/12/2022 hasta 20/12/202266. 20 December 2022: Concluido - (Rechazado) desde 20/12/2022 hasta 27/12/2022

20 December 2022

How did the plenary vote?

More votes against 143 yes · 189 no · 11 abst.

Voted on: Private member's bill from the VOX Parliamentary Group, amending Law 7/1985, of April 2, regulating the basic regime of local government, in order to modify the municipal register in cases of occupation and illegal immigration.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 1 of sitting 227· updated 10 Nov

Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.

Your province

How did the deputies from your province vote?

And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.

Or see how most of each province voted
More details: how each group and each province voted

The groups

Who voted in favour and who against?

In favour, most of Popular en el Congreso and VOX. Against, most of Euskal Herria Bildu, Republicano, Socialista, Vasco (EAJ-PNV), Mixto, Gcup-ec-gc and GPlu. 5 deputies voted differently from their group.

By province: in 17 most voted in favour; in 19, against.

Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.

  • In favour: 17
  • Against: 19
  • Tie: 16
Result by parliamentary group
GroupSeatsHow it voted
Euskal Herria Bildu5
5 against
Republicano13
12 against · 1 did not vote
Socialista120
119 against · 1 did not vote
Vasco (EAJ-PNV)6
6 against
Mixto11
3 in favour · 4 against · 2 abst. · 2 did not vote
Ciudadanos9
9 abst.
Gcup-ec-gc33
32 against · 1 did not vote
GPlu12
11 against · 1 did not vote
Popular en el Congreso88
88 in favour
VOX52
52 in favour

What happens next

What happens now?

It goes no further. A similar one could be introduced later.

It was presented again:

Sources

Where does all this come from?

  • The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
  • Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
  • We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.