What it is
Bill would require proof of title to register as resident
It is a members’ bill. Introduced by parliamentary groups, the Senate, regional governments or citizens. It was introduced on 17 October 2022. Introduced by: Grupo Parlamentario VOX.
Official title: Private member's bill amending Law 7/1985, of 2 April, Regulating the Bases of the Local Regime, with the aim of modifying the municipal census in cases of occupation and illegal immigration.
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000262· updated 11 Nov
Automatic summary, not yet reviewed
- The bill, introduced by the VOX parliamentary group, would amend Law 7/1985 so that anyone seeking to register in the municipal register for a property must provide proof of title to the home or the owner's authorization. It would also expressly record in the register the situation of people living illegally in Spain.
- The bill would make registrations in the municipal register made without title or the owner's authorization null from the start. Such registrations would not count as proof of residence and would grant no rights.
- The law would take effect the day after its publication in the Official State Gazette (Boletín Oficial del Estado), and is issued under state powers over basic equality for Spaniards and the legal framework of public administrations.
Who it affects
- People occupying homes without permission: they could not register without title or the owner's authorization.: restriction
- Foreigners in an irregular situation: their status would be expressly recorded in the register.: restriction
- Property owners: they could require that registration include their authorization.: protection
- City councils: they would have to apply the new registration requirements.: obligation
Words worth knowing
- Padrón municipal
- The municipal register where each city council records the people living in its municipality.
- Justo título
- Spanish term for a document proving the right to use or own a home, such as a deed or a lease.
- Nula de pleno derecho
- Null from the start, with no need for a court to declare it so.
- Exposición de motivos
- The opening section of a bill explaining why it is proposed.
It summarizes the text as it was introduced. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries
Where it stands
How far did it get?
It took 2 of 7 steps. It reached Admitted, and today it is rejected.
- Introduced17 October 2022Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
- Admitted26 October 2022The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
- Amendmentsnot reachedGroups propose changes.
- Committeenot reachedA committee goes through the text in detail.
- Plenarynot reachedAll 350 deputies vote.
- Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
- BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 6 official steps on a timeline
20 December 2022
How did the plenary vote?
Voted on: Private member's bill from the VOX Parliamentary Group, amending Law 7/1985, of April 2, regulating the basic regime of local government, in order to modify the municipal register in cases of occupation and illegal immigration.
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 1 of sitting 227· updated 10 Nov
Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.
Your province
How did the deputies from your province vote?
And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.
Or see how most of each province voted
- A Coruña More votes against 3 yes · 5 no
- Albacete Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Alicante/Alacant More votes in favour 6 yes · 5 no · 1 abst.
- Almería More votes in favour 4 yes · 2 no
- Araba/Álava More votes against 0 yes · 4 no
- Asturias More votes against 3 yes · 4 no
- Ávila More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Badajoz Tie 3 yes · 3 no
- Barcelona More votes against 4 yes · 25 no · 2 abst.
- Bizkaia More votes against 1 yes · 7 no
- Burgos Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Cáceres Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Cádiz Tie 4 yes · 4 no · 1 abst.
- Cantabria More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no · 1 abst.
- Castellón/Castelló More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- Ceuta More votes in favour 1 yes · 0 no
- Ciudad Real More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no
- Córdoba Tie 3 yes · 3 no
- Cuenca More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Gipuzkoa More votes against 0 yes · 6 no
- Girona More votes against 0 yes · 6 no
- Granada More votes against 3 yes · 4 no
- Guadalajara More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Huelva More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- Huesca More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Illes Balears Tie 4 yes · 4 no
- Jaén More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- La Rioja Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Las Palmas More votes against 3 yes · 4 no
- León Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Lleida More votes against 0 yes · 4 no
- Lugo Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Madrid More votes in favour 17 yes · 16 no · 3 abst.
- Málaga Tie 5 yes · 5 no · 1 abst.
- Melilla More votes in favour 1 yes · 0 no
- Murcia More votes in favour 6 yes · 4 no
- Navarra More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- Ourense Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Palencia More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Pontevedra Tie 3 yes · 3 no
- Salamanca More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no
- Santa Cruz de Tenerife Tie 3 yes · 3 no
- Segovia More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Sevilla More votes against 4 yes · 7 no
- Soria Tie 1 yes · 1 no
- Tarragona More votes against 0 yes · 6 no
- Teruel Tie 1 yes · 1 no · 1 abst.
- Toledo More votes in favour 4 yes · 2 no
- Valencia/València More votes in favour 7 yes · 6 no · 1 abst.
- Valladolid More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no
- Zamora More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Zaragoza More votes against 3 yes · 4 no
More details: how each group and each province voted
The groups
Who voted in favour and who against?
In favour, most of Popular en el Congreso and VOX. Against, most of Euskal Herria Bildu, Republicano, Socialista, Vasco (EAJ-PNV), Mixto, Gcup-ec-gc and GPlu. 5 deputies voted differently from their group.
By province: in 17 most voted in favour; in 19, against.
Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.
- In favour: 17
- Against: 19
- Tie: 16
| Group | Seats | How it voted |
|---|---|---|
| Euskal Herria Bildu | 5 | 5 against |
| Republicano | 13 | 12 against · 1 did not vote |
| Socialista | 120 | 119 against · 1 did not vote |
| Vasco (EAJ-PNV) | 6 | 6 against |
| Mixto | 11 | 3 in favour · 4 against · 2 abst. · 2 did not vote |
| Ciudadanos | 9 | 9 abst. |
| Gcup-ec-gc | 33 | 32 against · 1 did not vote |
| GPlu | 12 | 11 against · 1 did not vote |
| Popular en el Congreso | 88 | 88 in favour |
| VOX | 52 | 52 in favour |
What happens next
What happens now?
It goes no further. A similar one could be introduced later.
It was presented again:
- XV Legislature, Congreso de los Diputados· Rejected Bill would require proof of title to register as a resident
Sources
Where does all this come from?
- Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000262
Official title, type, author, dates and stage.
Retrieved 11 November 2026
- Congreso de los Diputados, vote 1 of sitting 227
The count and every seat’s vote.
Retrieved 10 November 2026
- The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
- Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
- We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.