What it is
Stricter rules for health care advertising
It is a members’ bill. Introduced by parliamentary groups, the Senate, regional governments or citizens. It was introduced on 27 December 2019. Introduced by: Grupo Parlamentario Popular en el Congreso.
Official title: Private member's bill on the advertising of health services and activities.
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000011· updated 11 Nov
Automatic summary, not yet reviewed
- The bill would regulate health care advertising, distinguishing between advertising aimed at the public and advertising aimed at health care professionals.
- Only authorized health care centers, services and establishments could advertise to the public, limited to the activities they are authorized to provide.
- Public-directed advertising would have specific requirements: clearly identify the activity, use clear messages, warn about risks, include the registry number, and advise consulting a health professional in case of doubt.
- Ads promising guaranteed results, aimed at children, using cure testimonials, offering discounts or incentives, or comparing or disparaging other professionals would be banned, among other practices.
- Public-directed advertising would require prior administrative authorization, with a decision within two months and a maximum validity of five years; professional-directed advertising would only need to be reported before it starts.
- The bill would allow a cease-and-desist action against advertising that breaks the law, requested by authorities, consumer associations, professional bodies and holders of a legitimate interest, plus penalties under health regulations.
Who it affects
- Health care centers, services and establishments: Only they could advertise to the public, with prior authorization and subject to bans and requirements.
- Health care professionals: They could not back commercial advertising aimed at the public or call themselves specialists without the official degree.
- Drug and medical device companies: They would be banned from public-directed health care advertising.
- Consumers and patients: They would get more truthful advertising and could demand that unlawful ads stop.
- Health authorities and professional bodies: They would inspect, authorize and control health care advertising.
Words worth knowing
- Acción de cesación
- A request or lawsuit to force someone to stop advertising that breaks the law.
- Prestación sanitaria
- Health-related services that are not a health care activity proper.
- Actividad sanitaria
- Work to promote, prevent, diagnose, treat or rehabilitate health.
- Autorización administrativa previa
- Permission that must be requested and obtained from the health authority before running the ad.
It summarizes the text as it was introduced. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries
Where it stands
How far did it get?
It took 2 of 7 steps. It reached Admitted, and today it is rejected.
- Introduced27 December 2019Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
- Admitted15 January 2020The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
- Amendmentsnot reachedGroups propose changes.
- Committeenot reachedA committee goes through the text in detail.
- Plenarynot reachedAll 350 deputies vote.
- Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
- BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 6 official steps on a timeline
28 April 2022
How did the plenary vote?
Voted on: Private member's bill by the Popular Parliamentary Group in the Congress, regarding the advertising of benefits and health activities.
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 18 of sitting 174· updated 10 Nov
Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.
Your province
How did the deputies from your province vote?
And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.
Or see how most of each province voted
- A Coruña More votes against 3 yes · 4 no · 1 abst.
- Albacete More votes against 1 yes · 2 no · 1 abst.
- Alicante/Alacant More votes against 3 yes · 5 no · 4 abst.
- Almería Tie 2 yes · 2 no · 2 abst.
- Araba/Álava More votes against 1 yes · 2 no · 1 abst.
- Asturias More votes against 2 yes · 4 no · 1 abst.
- Ávila Tie 1 yes · 1 no · 1 abst.
- Badajoz More votes against 2 yes · 3 no · 1 abst.
- Barcelona More votes against 10 yes · 16 no · 6 abst.
- Bizkaia More votes in favour 4 yes · 3 no · 1 abst.
- Burgos Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Cáceres More votes against 1 yes · 2 no · 1 abst.
- Cádiz More votes against 2 yes · 4 no · 3 abst.
- Cantabria More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no · 1 abst.
- Castellón/Castelló More votes against 1 yes · 3 no · 1 abst.
- Ceuta Tie 0 yes · 0 no · 1 abst.
- Ciudad Real Tie 2 yes · 2 no · 1 abst.
- Córdoba More votes against 2 yes · 3 no · 1 abst.
- Cuenca More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Gipuzkoa Tie 2 yes · 2 no · 2 abst.
- Girona Tie 3 yes · 3 no
- Granada More votes against 2 yes · 4 no · 1 abst.
- Guadalajara Tie 1 yes · 1 no · 1 abst.
- Huelva More votes against 1 yes · 3 no · 1 abst.
- Huesca More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Illes Balears More votes against 2 yes · 4 no · 2 abst.
- Jaén More votes against 1 yes · 3 no · 1 abst.
- La Rioja Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Las Palmas More votes against 2 yes · 5 no · 1 abst.
- León More votes against 1 yes · 2 no · 1 abst.
- Lleida More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no
- Lugo Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Madrid More votes against 12 yes · 15 no · 10 abst.
- Málaga More votes against 3 yes · 5 no · 3 abst.
- Melilla More votes in favour 1 yes · 0 no
- Murcia More votes against 3 yes · 4 no · 3 abst.
- Navarra Tie 2 yes · 2 no · 1 abst.
- Ourense Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Palencia More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Pontevedra More votes against 3 yes · 4 no
- Salamanca More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no · 1 abst.
- Santa Cruz de Tenerife More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no · 1 abst.
- Segovia Tie 1 yes · 1 no · 1 abst.
- Sevilla More votes against 3 yes · 7 no · 2 abst.
- Soria Tie 1 yes · 1 no
- Tarragona Tie 3 yes · 3 no
- Teruel Tie 1 yes · 1 no · 1 abst.
- Toledo Tie 2 yes · 2 no · 2 abst.
- Valencia/València More votes against 5 yes · 6 no · 4 abst.
- Valladolid Tie 2 yes · 2 no · 1 abst.
- Zamora Tie 1 yes · 1 no · 1 abst.
- Zaragoza More votes against 2 yes · 4 no · 1 abst.
More details: how each group and each province voted
The groups
Who voted in favour and who against?
In favour, most of Republicano, Vasco (EAJ-PNV), Mixto, GPlu and Popular en el Congreso. Against, most of Socialista and Gcup-ec-gc. 10 deputies voted differently from their group.
By province: in 7 most voted in favour; in 26, against.
Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.
- In favour: 7
- Against: 26
- Abstained: 1
- Tie: 18
| Group | Seats | How it voted |
|---|---|---|
| Euskal Herria Bildu | 5 | 5 abst. |
| Republicano | 13 | 13 in favour |
| Socialista | 120 | 120 against |
| Vasco (EAJ-PNV) | 6 | 6 in favour |
| Mixto | 11 | 6 in favour · 2 against · 3 abst. |
| Ciudadanos | 9 | 9 abst. |
| Gcup-ec-gc | 33 | 33 against |
| GPlu | 12 | 7 in favour · 4 against · 1 abst. |
| Popular en el Congreso | 88 | 88 in favour |
| VOX | 52 | 52 abst. |
What happens next
What happens now?
It goes no further. A similar one could be introduced later.
Presented before in:
- XII Legislature, Congreso de los Diputados· Unfinished Stricter rules for advertising health services
- XIII Legislature, Congreso de los Diputados· Unfinished The bill would require prior approval for health care advertising aimed at the public
Sources
Where does all this come from?
- Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000011
Official title, type, author, dates and stage.
Retrieved 11 November 2026
- Congreso de los Diputados, vote 18 of sitting 174
The count and every seat’s vote.
Retrieved 10 November 2026
- The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
- Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
- We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.