What it is
Overhaul of Spain's citizen security law: fewer fines, more safeguards
It is a members’ bill. Introduced by parliamentary groups, the Senate, regional governments or citizens. It was introduced on 13 December 2019. Introduced by: Grupo Parlamentario Vasco (EAJ-PNV).
Official title: Organic private member's bill to amend Organic Law 4/2015, of March 30, on the protection of public safety.
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000003· updated 11 Nov
Automatic summary, not yet reviewed
- The bill would require police actions to be interpreted in the way most favorable to fundamental rights, especially the rights to assemble, demonstrate, express opinions, join unions and strike.
- It would allow police to stop and identify someone only on reasonable suspicion based on that person's behavior or objective circumstances. Officers would have to identify themselves and not discriminate. If someone is taken to a police station for identification, it could last at most two hours, extendable to six, and they would receive a receipt.
- It would make dissolving a demonstration a last resort, with clear and sufficient verbal warning beforehand, and lack of prior notice would not prevent people from exercising the right to assemble.
- It would downgrade or remove several serious offenses: possessing drugs not intended for trafficking and growing them would become minor offenses, as would driving people to access drugs; the offense of demonstrations outside the Congress, Senate or regional assemblies would disappear.
- It would lower fines: very serious offenses would range from €25,001 to €600,000, serious ones from €501 to €25,000, and minor ones from €100 to €500. People earning up to 1.5 or up to 2.5 times the minimum wage would get reductions of 50% or 25%.
- It would allow voluntary payment within fifteen days to cut the fine by half for serious and minor offenses, and fines could be paid in installments or suspended through educational or reparative activities, especially for minors.
- It would make photographing or sharing images of police officers an offense only if it creates a real danger, which must be documented with reasons in the report; merely taking images at demonstrations would not be an offense.
- It would keep prior law for sanctioning procedures already underway unless the new law is more favorable, and the law would take effect the day after its publication in the official state gazette.
Who it affects
- People taking part in demonstrations or assemblies: They would gain safeguards: dissolution would be a last resort and lack of prior notice would not block the right to assemble.
- People stopped by police for identification: Identification would require reasonable suspicion, and time at the station would be capped at two hours, extendable to six.
- People fined under this law: They could get reductions for low income, a 50% discount for voluntary payment, and installments or suspension of fines.
- People who use or carry drugs in public: Possession not intended for trafficking and growing drugs would drop from serious to minor offenses, with fines of €100 to €500.
- People who film or share images of police officers: It would only be an offense if it creates a real danger, not for merely taking or sharing images.
Words worth knowing
- Ley orgánica (organic law)
- A Spanish law that requires an absolute majority in the Congress and is reserved for major matters such as fundamental rights.
- Infracción leve, grave y muy grave (minor, serious and very serious offense)
- The three levels of administrative offense, from least to most serious, with matching fines.
- Pago voluntario (voluntary payment)
- Paying the fine within a set period in exchange for a reduction, giving up the right to argue the case.
- Ponencia (drafting committee)
- A small group of members of parliament that studies the bill and writes a report with the agreed text.
- Salario Mínimo Interprofesional (minimum wage)
- The lowest legal wage that can be paid for a full working day in Spain.
It summarizes the drafting committee report. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries
Where it stands
How far did it get?
It took 4 of 7 steps. It reached Committee, and today it is rejected.
- Introduced13 December 2019Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
- Admitted15 January 2020The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
- Amendments9 October 2020Groups propose changes.
- Committee23 December 2020A committee goes through the text in detail.
- Plenarynot reachedAll 350 deputies vote.
- Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
- BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 13 official steps on a timeline
4 February 2021
How did the plenary vote?
Voted on: Vote on the amendment to the whole with alternative text to the Private member's bill for an Organic Law amending Organic Law 4/2015, of 30 March, on the protection of public safety, submitted by the Popular Parliamentary Group in the Congress.
This law had 2 votes; this is the latest with every deputy’s vote. See them all
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 11 of sitting 73· updated 11 Nov
Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.
Your province
How did the deputies from your province vote?
And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.
Or see how most of each province voted
- A Coruña More votes against 3 yes · 5 no
- Albacete More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Alicante/Alacant More votes against 3 yes · 9 no
- Almería More votes against 2 yes · 4 no
- Araba/Álava More votes against 0 yes · 4 no
- Asturias More votes against 2 yes · 5 no
- Ávila More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Badajoz More votes against 2 yes · 4 no
- Barcelona More votes against 2 yes · 29 no · 1 abst.
- Bizkaia More votes against 1 yes · 7 no
- Burgos Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Cáceres More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Cádiz More votes against 2 yes · 7 no
- Cantabria Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Castellón/Castelló More votes against 1 yes · 4 no
- Ceuta More votes against 0 yes · 1 no
- Ciudad Real More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- Córdoba More votes against 2 yes · 4 no
- Cuenca More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Gipuzkoa More votes against 0 yes · 6 no
- Girona More votes against 0 yes · 6 no
- Granada More votes against 2 yes · 5 no
- Guadalajara More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Huelva More votes against 1 yes · 4 no
- Huesca More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Illes Balears More votes against 2 yes · 6 no
- Jaén More votes against 1 yes · 4 no
- La Rioja Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Las Palmas More votes against 2 yes · 5 no
- León More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Lleida More votes against 0 yes · 4 no
- Lugo Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Madrid More votes against 10 yes · 27 no
- Málaga More votes against 3 yes · 8 no
- Melilla More votes in favour 1 yes · 0 no
- Murcia More votes against 3 yes · 7 no
- Navarra More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- Ourense Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Palencia More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Pontevedra More votes against 3 yes · 4 no
- Salamanca Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Santa Cruz de Tenerife More votes against 2 yes · 4 no · 1 abst.
- Segovia More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Sevilla More votes against 2 yes · 10 no
- Soria Tie 1 yes · 1 no
- Tarragona More votes against 0 yes · 6 no
- Teruel More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Toledo More votes against 2 yes · 4 no
- Valencia/València More votes against 4 yes · 11 no
- Valladolid More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- Zamora More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Zaragoza More votes against 2 yes · 5 no
More details: how each group and each province voted
The groups
Who voted in favour and who against?
In favour, most of Popular en el Congreso. Against, most of Euskal Herria Bildu, Republicano, Socialista, Vasco (EAJ-PNV), Ciudadanos, Gcup-ec-gc, GPlu and VOX. 1 deputy voted differently from their group.
By province: in 2 most voted in favour; in 43, against.
Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.
- In favour: 2
- Against: 43
- Tie: 7
| Group | Seats | How it voted |
|---|---|---|
| Euskal Herria Bildu | 5 | 5 against |
| Republicano | 13 | 12 against · 1 abst. |
| Socialista | 120 | 120 against |
| Vasco (EAJ-PNV) | 6 | 6 against |
| Mixto | 9 | 3 in favour · 3 against · 1 abst. · 2 did not vote |
| Ciudadanos | 10 | 10 against |
| Gcup-ec-gc | 35 | 35 against |
| GPlu | 12 | 12 against |
| Popular en el Congreso | 88 | 88 in favour |
| VOX | 52 | 52 against |
What happens next
What happens now?
It goes no further. A similar one could be introduced later.
It was presented again:
- XV Legislature, Congreso de los Diputados· Unfinished Organic private member's bill to amend Organic Law 4/2015, of March 30, on the protection of public safety.
- XV Legislature, Congreso de los Diputados· Unfinished Organic private member's bill to amend Organic Law 4/2015, of March 30, on the protection of public safety.
Presented before in:
- XII Legislature, Congreso de los Diputados· Withdrawn Bill to soften penalties under Spain's citizen security law
- XII Legislature, Congreso de los Diputados· Unfinished Organic private member's bill to amend Organic Law 4/2015, of March 30, on the protection of public safety.
- XIII Legislature, Congreso de los Diputados· Unfinished· nearly the same title Bill to reform the citizen security law to strengthen rights and safeguards
Sources
Where does all this come from?
- Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000003
Official title, type, author, dates and stage.
Retrieved 11 November 2026
- Congreso de los Diputados, vote 11 of sitting 73
The count and every seat’s vote.
Retrieved 11 November 2026
- The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
- Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
- We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.