Skip to content

Where are you from?

Choose your province and we will tell you how the deputies and senators you elected vote, one by one.

 

We remember it in this browser. If you create an account, we keep it there.

Type a law, a topic, a person or a province.

What it is

Overhaul of Spain's citizen security law: fewer fines, more safeguards

Committee step 4 of 7 · Rejected

It is a members’ bill. Introduced by parliamentary groups, the Senate, regional governments or citizens. It was introduced on 13 December 2019. Introduced by: Grupo Parlamentario Vasco (EAJ-PNV).

Official title: Organic private member's bill to amend Organic Law 4/2015, of March 30, on the protection of public safety.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000003· updated 11 Nov

Automatic summary, not yet reviewed

  1. The bill would require police actions to be interpreted in the way most favorable to fundamental rights, especially the rights to assemble, demonstrate, express opinions, join unions and strike.
  2. It would allow police to stop and identify someone only on reasonable suspicion based on that person's behavior or objective circumstances. Officers would have to identify themselves and not discriminate. If someone is taken to a police station for identification, it could last at most two hours, extendable to six, and they would receive a receipt.
  3. It would make dissolving a demonstration a last resort, with clear and sufficient verbal warning beforehand, and lack of prior notice would not prevent people from exercising the right to assemble.
  4. It would downgrade or remove several serious offenses: possessing drugs not intended for trafficking and growing them would become minor offenses, as would driving people to access drugs; the offense of demonstrations outside the Congress, Senate or regional assemblies would disappear.
  5. It would lower fines: very serious offenses would range from €25,001 to €600,000, serious ones from €501 to €25,000, and minor ones from €100 to €500. People earning up to 1.5 or up to 2.5 times the minimum wage would get reductions of 50% or 25%.
  6. It would allow voluntary payment within fifteen days to cut the fine by half for serious and minor offenses, and fines could be paid in installments or suspended through educational or reparative activities, especially for minors.
  7. It would make photographing or sharing images of police officers an offense only if it creates a real danger, which must be documented with reasons in the report; merely taking images at demonstrations would not be an offense.
  8. It would keep prior law for sanctioning procedures already underway unless the new law is more favorable, and the law would take effect the day after its publication in the official state gazette.

Who it affects

  • People taking part in demonstrations or assemblies: They would gain safeguards: dissolution would be a last resort and lack of prior notice would not block the right to assemble.
  • People stopped by police for identification: Identification would require reasonable suspicion, and time at the station would be capped at two hours, extendable to six.
  • People fined under this law: They could get reductions for low income, a 50% discount for voluntary payment, and installments or suspension of fines.
  • People who use or carry drugs in public: Possession not intended for trafficking and growing drugs would drop from serious to minor offenses, with fines of €100 to €500.
  • People who film or share images of police officers: It would only be an offense if it creates a real danger, not for merely taking or sharing images.

Words worth knowing

Ley orgánica (organic law)
A Spanish law that requires an absolute majority in the Congress and is reserved for major matters such as fundamental rights.
Infracción leve, grave y muy grave (minor, serious and very serious offense)
The three levels of administrative offense, from least to most serious, with matching fines.
Pago voluntario (voluntary payment)
Paying the fine within a set period in exchange for a reduction, giving up the right to argue the case.
Ponencia (drafting committee)
A small group of members of parliament that studies the bill and writes a report with the agreed text.
Salario Mínimo Interprofesional (minimum wage)
The lowest legal wage that can be paid for a full working day in Spain.

It summarizes the drafting committee report. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries

Where it stands

How far did it get?

It took 4 of 7 steps. It reached Committee, and today it is rejected.

  1. Introduced13 December 2019Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
  2. Admitted15 January 2020The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
  3. Amendments9 October 2020Groups propose changes.
  4. Committee23 December 2020A committee goes through the text in detail.
  5. Plenarynot reachedAll 350 deputies vote.
  6. Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
  7. BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 13 official steps on a timeline
Dec 2019Mar 2020Jun 2020Sept 2020Dec 2020Mar 2021Jun 2021Sept 2021Dec 2021Mar 2022Jun 2022Sept 2022Dec 202211. 13 December 2019: Presentación22. 15 January 2020: Boletín Oficial de las Cortes Generales Publicación desde 15/01/2020 hasta 17/01/202033. 15 January 2020: Calificación44. 17 January 2020: Gobierno Contestación desde 17/01/2020 hasta 07/03/202055. 7 March 2020: Pleno Toma en consideración desde 07/03/2020 hasta 29/09/202066. 29 September 2020: Mesa del Congreso Acuerdo subsiguiente a la toma en consideración desde 29/09/2020 hasta 06/10/202077. 6 October 2020: Comisión de Interior Publicación desde 06/10/2020 hasta 09/10/202088. 9 October 2020: Comisión de Interior Enmiendas desde 09/10/2020 hasta 11/11/202199. 29 October 2020: Comisión de Interior Mesa - Calificación desde 29/10/2020 hasta 23/12/20201010. 23 December 2020: Comisión de Interior Debate de totalidad desde 23/12/2020 hasta 04/02/20211111. 11 November 2021: Comisión de Interior Informe desde 11/11/2021 hasta 01/02/20231212. 1 February 2023: Comisión de Interior Dictamen desde 01/02/2023 hasta 14/03/20231313. 14 March 2023: Concluido - (Rechazado) desde 14/03/2023 hasta 24/03/2023 Nota: La Comisión de Interior rechazó el Dictamen.

4 February 2021

How did the plenary vote?

More votes against 91 yes · 255 no · 2 abst.

Voted on: Vote on the amendment to the whole with alternative text to the Private member's bill for an Organic Law amending Organic Law 4/2015, of 30 March, on the protection of public safety, submitted by the Popular Parliamentary Group in the Congress.

This law had 2 votes; this is the latest with every deputy’s vote. See them all

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 11 of sitting 73· updated 11 Nov

Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.

Your province

How did the deputies from your province vote?

And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.

Or see how most of each province voted
More details: how each group and each province voted

The groups

Who voted in favour and who against?

In favour, most of Popular en el Congreso. Against, most of Euskal Herria Bildu, Republicano, Socialista, Vasco (EAJ-PNV), Ciudadanos, Gcup-ec-gc, GPlu and VOX. 1 deputy voted differently from their group.

By province: in 2 most voted in favour; in 43, against.

Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.

  • In favour: 2
  • Against: 43
  • Tie: 7
Result by parliamentary group
GroupSeatsHow it voted
Euskal Herria Bildu5
5 against
Republicano13
12 against · 1 abst.
Socialista120
120 against
Vasco (EAJ-PNV)6
6 against
Mixto9
3 in favour · 3 against · 1 abst. · 2 did not vote
Ciudadanos10
10 against
Gcup-ec-gc35
35 against
GPlu12
12 against
Popular en el Congreso88
88 in favour
VOX52
52 against

What happens next

What happens now?

It goes no further. A similar one could be introduced later.

It was presented again:

Presented before in:

Sources

Where does all this come from?

  • The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
  • Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
  • We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.