Skip to content

Where are you from?

Choose your province and we will tell you how the deputies and senators you elected vote, one by one.

 

We remember it in this browser. If you create an account, we keep it there.

Type a law, a topic, a person or a province.

What it is

Bill to soften penalties under Spain's citizen security law

Committee step 4 of 7 · Withdrawn

It is a members’ bill. Introduced by parliamentary groups, the Senate, regional governments or citizens. It was introduced on 20 January 2017. Introduced by: Grupo Parlamentario Vasco (EAJ-PNV).

Official title: Organic private member's bill to amend Organic Law 4/2015, of March 30, on the protection of public safety.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000062· updated 11 Nov

Automatic summary, not yet reviewed

  1. The bill, introduced by the Basque Parliamentary Group (EAJ-PNV), would reform the 2015 organic law A law on fundamental rights, the electoral system or other matters the Constitution reserves. It needs an absolute majority in the Congreso: 176 votes. on citizen protection to give more weight to fundamental rights, especially the rights to assembly, demonstration, expression, information, union membership and strike.
  2. Several offenses would be removed from the law, including those in sections 36.2, 36.3, 36.14, 36.17, 36.18, 36.19, 36.23 and 37.13, because they are already covered by the Criminal Code or because the protected legal interest is unclear. Among them is the provision allowing officers to seize cameras or image-capturing devices.
  3. Spontaneous and peaceful gatherings or demonstrations, held in response to current events, would no longer be punishable if they do not significantly disturb citizen security, and under the assembly law they would not require prior notice.
  4. Fines for administrative offenses that are not crimes could not exceed the lowest penalty set for the corresponding criminal offense. In addition, fine amounts could be adjusted to the offender's financial means, through installment payments, suspension, reduction or substitution of the penalty.
  5. New rules would be added on mistakes, mitigating and aggravating factors, and the Non bis in idem A rule barring punishment of a person twice for the same act on the same grounds. principle, which bars punishing someone twice for the same act. The bill also clarifies who is responsible for order at demonstrations, with or without prior notice, and allows urgent calls to be notified just 24 hours in advance.
  6. The immigration law would be amended so that turning back foreigners who enter Spain illegally respects international human rights and protection rules Spain is bound by. The Government would have three months to issue implementing rules; until then, such measures could not be taken.

Who it affects

  • People taking part in spontaneous, peaceful demonstrations: They could no longer be sanctioned if they do not seriously disturb citizen security.
  • People fined under the citizen security law: Their fines could be adjusted to their financial means, paid in installments, suspended or reduced.
  • Organizers of gatherings and demonstrations: Responsibility for keeping order would be clearer, and urgent calls could be notified 24 hours ahead.
  • Foreigners at the border: Turnbacks would have to respect international human rights rules.
  • Journalists and people filming in public: The offense allowing seizure of image-capturing devices would disappear.

Words worth knowing

Ley Orgánica (Organic Law)
A Spanish law reserved for major matters, such as fundamental rights, requiring a special vote in Congress.
Non bis in idem
A rule barring punishment of a person twice for the same act on the same grounds.
Principio de proporcionalidad (principle of proportionality)
The penalty must match the seriousness of the act and be the least intense measure possible.
Devolución en frontera (border turnback)
Rejecting a foreigner at the border for entering irregularly, without a full expulsion procedure.
Proposición de ley (parliamentary bill)
A text proposed by a parliamentary group that still must be debated and passed to become law.
organic law
A law on fundamental rights, the electoral system or other matters the Constitution reserves. It needs an absolute majority in the Congreso: 176 votes.

It summarizes the text as it was introduced. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries

Where it stands

How far did it get?

It took 4 of 7 steps. It reached Committee, and today it is withdrawn.

  1. Introduced20 January 2017Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
  2. Admitted26 January 2017The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
  3. Amendments3 April 2017Groups propose changes.
  4. Committee13 September 2017A committee goes through the text in detail.
  5. Plenarynot reachedAll 350 deputies vote.
  6. Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
  7. BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 12 official steps on a timeline
Mar 2017Jun 2017Sept 2017Dec 2017Mar 2018Jun 2018Sept 201811. 20 January 2017: Presentación22. 26 January 2017: Boletín Oficial de las Cortes Generales Publicación desde 26/01/2017 hasta 30/01/201733. 26 January 2017: Calificación44. 30 January 2017: Gobierno Contestación desde 30/01/2017 hasta 08/03/201755. 8 March 2017: Pleno Toma en consideración desde 08/03/2017 hasta 21/03/201766. 21 March 2017: Mesa del Congreso Acuerdo subsiguiente a la toma en consideración desde 21/03/2017 hasta 28/03/201777. 28 March 2017: Comisión de Interior Publicación desde 28/03/2017 hasta 03/04/201788. 3 April 2017: Comisión de Interior Enmiendas desde 03/04/2017 hasta 28/02/201899. 13 September 2017: Comisión de Interior Mesa - Calificación desde 13/09/2017 hasta 13/09/20171010. 13 September 2017: Comisión de Interior Debate de totalidad desde 13/09/2017 hasta 21/09/20171111. 28 February 2018: Comisión de Interior Informe desde 28/02/2018 hasta 23/10/20181212. 23 October 2018: Concluido- (Subsumido en otra iniciativa) desde 23/10/2018 hasta 23/10/2018

21 September 2017

How did the plenary vote?

More votes against 22 yes · 249 no · 64 abst.

Voted on: Vote on the amendment to the whole of the alternative text to the Organic Private member's bill for the reform of Organic Law 4/2015, of 30 March, on the protection of public safety, submitted by the Mixed Parliamentary Group (Ms. Beitialarrangoitia).

This law had 2 votes; this is the latest with every deputy’s vote. See them all

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 18 of sitting 72· updated 10 Nov

Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.

Your province

How did the deputies from your province vote?

And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.

Or see how most of each province voted
More details: how each group and each province voted

The groups

Who voted in favour and who against?

In favour, most of Mixto and GER. Against, most of Socialista, Vasco (EAJ-PNV), Ciudadanos and Popular en el Congreso. 3 deputies voted differently from their group.

By province: in 1 most voted in favour; in 49, against.

Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.

  • In favour: 1
  • Against: 49
  • Tie: 2
Result by parliamentary group
GroupSeatsHow it voted
Socialista84
84 against
Vasco (EAJ-PNV)5
5 against
Mixto19
15 in favour · 2 against · 2 did not vote
Ciudadanos32
31 against · 1 did not vote
Gcup-ec-em67
1 in favour · 64 abst. · 2 did not vote
GER9
6 in favour · 3 did not vote
Popular en el Congreso134
127 against · 7 did not vote

What happens next

What happens now?

Whoever introduced it withdrew it, or it was merged into another one. It goes no further.

It was presented again:

Sources

Where does all this come from?

  • The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
  • Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
  • We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.