What it is
The bill would create a single body to complain against banks
It is a government bill. Introduced by the Government. It was introduced on 28 November 2022. Introduced by: Gobierno.
Official title: Government bill for the creation of the Independent Administrative Authority for the Defense of the Financial Customer for the out-of-court resolution of conflicts between financial entities and their customers.
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 121/000134· updated 11 Nov
Automatic summary, not yet reviewed
- The bill would create the Independent Administrative Authority for the Defense of the Financial Customer, a public body that would resolve customer complaints against financial institutions free of charge, without the need for a lawyer or court representative.
- Its decisions would be binding on financial institutions when the complaint concerns breaches of conduct rules or abusive clauses and the amount is under €20,000 or undetermined. The institution would have to comply within 30 working days, and could be fined if it does not.
- Before going to the Authority, the customer must first complain to the financial institution's customer service department and wait one month without a satisfactory answer. After that, the customer would have one year to file the complaint with the Authority.
- The procedure has short deadlines: the investigation may not exceed 45 working days and the decision 20 working days, with an overall maximum of 90 calendar days. If no decision is issued on time, the complaint is deemed rejected for the purpose of going to court.
- If an upheld complaint has no monetary content, the decision could award the customer compensation of between €100 and €2,000. If the complainant acted in bad faith and loses entirely, a fine of €50 to €250 could be imposed.
- The Authority would replace the complaint services of the Bank of Spain, the National Securities Market Commission and the Directorate General for Insurance and Pension Funds, which would stop handling complaints once the new Authority starts operating.
- Institutions that fail to comply with binding decisions could be fined up to 2% of their annual turnover, with a maximum of €2 million for serious infringements, and their executives could also be sanctioned.
- The bill would strengthen personalized service in financial services, taking into account each person's age, disability, place of residence and digital skills, and would promote financial education for the most vulnerable groups.
Who it affects
- Customers of banks, insurers, investment funds and payment services: They could complain free of charge to a single authority, without a lawyer, with decisions binding on the institution in many cases.
- Financial institutions: They would have to take part in the procedure, pay an annual fee and comply with binding decisions, facing fines if they do not.
- People over 65, people with disabilities and vulnerable groups: They would have adapted in-person, phone and online complaint channels, plus training programs aimed at them.
- Large companies: They do not count as financial customers, so they could not use this system.
Words worth knowing
- Resolución vinculante (binding decision)
- A decision the financial institution must comply with, although it can appeal to the civil courts.
- Normas de conducta (conduct rules)
- Rules requiring financial institutions to treat customers properly and give them correct information.
- Cláusula abusiva (abusive clause)
- A non-negotiated contract term that seriously and unfairly harms the customer.
- Servicio de atención a la clientela (customer service department)
- Each financial institution's internal department where customers must complain first before going to the Authority.
It summarizes the text passed by the full Congreso. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries
Where it stands
How far did it get?
It took 6 of 7 steps. It reached Senate, and today it is unfinished.
- Introduced28 November 2022Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
- Admitted5 December 2022The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
- Amendments16 December 2022Groups propose changes.
- Committee23 February 2023A committee goes through the text in detail.
- Plenary11 May 2023All 350 deputies vote.
- Senate18 May 2023The Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
- BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 12 official steps on a timeline
18 May 2023
How did the plenary vote?
Voted on: Vote on the Report on the Government Bill creating the Independent Administrative Authority for the Defense of the Financial Customer for the extrajudicial resolution of conflicts between financial entities and their customers, taking into account the distributed technical corrections.
This law had 48 votes; this is the latest with every deputy’s vote. See them all
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 69 of sitting 262· updated 10 Nov
Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.
Your province
How did the deputies from your province vote?
And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.
Or see how most of each province voted
- A Coruña More votes in favour 5 yes · 0 no · 3 abst.
- Albacete More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no · 1 abst.
- Alicante/Alacant More votes in favour 5 yes · 3 no · 3 abst.
- Almería Tie 2 yes · 2 no · 2 abst.
- Araba/Álava More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no
- Asturias More votes in favour 4 yes · 1 no · 2 abst.
- Ávila Tie 1 yes · 1 no · 1 abst.
- Badajoz More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no · 2 abst.
- Barcelona More votes in favour 21 yes · 2 no · 4 abst.
- Bizkaia More votes in favour 6 yes · 0 no · 1 abst.
- Burgos More votes in favour 2 yes · 0 no · 2 abst.
- Cáceres More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no · 1 abst.
- Cádiz More votes in favour 5 yes · 0 no · 3 abst.
- Cantabria More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no · 2 abst.
- Castellón/Castelló More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no · 1 abst.
- Ceuta More votes against 0 yes · 1 no
- Ciudad Real More votes in favour 2 yes · 0 no · 2 abst.
- Córdoba More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no · 2 abst.
- Cuenca More votes in favour 2 yes · 0 no · 1 abst.
- Gipuzkoa More votes in favour 6 yes · 0 no
- Girona More votes in favour 5 yes · 0 no · 1 abst.
- Granada More votes in favour 4 yes · 1 no · 2 abst.
- Guadalajara Tie 1 yes · 1 no · 1 abst.
- Huelva More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no · 1 abst.
- Huesca More votes in favour 2 yes · 0 no · 1 abst.
- Illes Balears More votes in favour 4 yes · 2 no · 2 abst.
- Jaén More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no · 1 abst.
- La Rioja More votes in favour 2 yes · 0 no · 2 abst.
- Las Palmas More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no · 2 abst.
- León More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no · 1 abst.
- Lleida More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no
- Lugo More votes in favour 2 yes · 0 no · 2 abst.
- Madrid More votes in favour 19 yes · 4 no · 10 abst.
- Málaga More votes in favour 5 yes · 2 no · 3 abst.
- Melilla Tie 0 yes · 0 no · 1 abst.
- Murcia More votes in favour 4 yes · 3 no · 3 abst.
- Navarra More votes in favour 2 yes · 0 no · 2 abst.
- Ourense More votes in favour 2 yes · 0 no · 2 abst.
- Palencia More votes in favour 1 yes · 0 no · 2 abst.
- Pontevedra More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no · 3 abst.
- Salamanca Tie 1 yes · 1 no · 2 abst.
- Santa Cruz de Tenerife More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no · 2 abst.
- Segovia Tie 1 yes · 1 no · 1 abst.
- Sevilla More votes in favour 7 yes · 3 no · 2 abst.
- Soria More votes in favour 1 yes · 0 no · 1 abst.
- Tarragona More votes in favour 6 yes · 0 no
- Teruel More votes in favour 1 yes · 0 no · 1 abst.
- Toledo Tie 2 yes · 2 no · 2 abst.
- Valencia/València More votes in favour 8 yes · 3 no · 4 abst.
- Valladolid More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no · 2 abst.
- Zamora Tie 1 yes · 1 no · 1 abst.
- Zaragoza More votes in favour 4 yes · 1 no · 2 abst.
More details: how each group and each province voted
The groups
Who voted in favour and who against?
In favour, most of Euskal Herria Bildu, Republicano, Socialista, Vasco (EAJ-PNV), Ciudadanos, Gcup-ec-gc and GPlu. Against, most of VOX. 9 deputies voted differently from their group.
By province: in 31 most voted in favour; in 1, against.
Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.
- In favour: 31
- Against: 1
- Abstained: 3
- Tie: 17
| Group | Seats | How it voted |
|---|---|---|
| Euskal Herria Bildu | 5 | 4 in favour · 1 did not vote |
| Republicano | 13 | 12 in favour · 1 did not vote |
| Socialista | 120 | 119 in favour · 1 did not vote |
| Vasco (EAJ-PNV) | 6 | 5 in favour · 1 did not vote |
| Mixto | 11 | 2 in favour · 1 against · 3 abst. · 5 did not vote |
| Ciudadanos | 9 | 8 in favour · 1 did not vote |
| Gcup-ec-gc | 33 | 27 in favour · 6 did not vote |
| GPlu | 12 | 7 in favour · 3 abst. · 2 did not vote |
| Popular en el Congreso | 88 | 88 abst. |
| VOX | 52 | 2 in favour · 46 against · 1 abst. · 3 did not vote |
What happens next
What happens now?
The legislature ended before it finished. To go on, someone would have to introduce it again in the new Cortes.
It was presented again:
- XV Legislature, Congreso de los Diputados· Unfinished The bill proposes a single body to complain against your bank
The same initiative in the other chamber:
Sources
Where does all this come from?
- Congreso de los Diputados, file 121/000134
Official title, type, author, dates and stage.
Retrieved 11 November 2026
- Congreso de los Diputados, vote 69 of sitting 262
The count and every seat’s vote.
Retrieved 10 November 2026
- The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
- Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
- We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.