What it is
Bill to guarantee equal treatment for women and men at work
It is a members’ bill. Introduced by parliamentary groups, the Senate, regional governments or citizens. It was introduced on 1 August 2018. Introduced by: Grupo Parlamentario Socialista.
Official title: Private member's bill to guarantee equal treatment and opportunities between women and men in employment and occupation.
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000268· updated 11 Nov
Automatic summary, not yet reviewed
- The bill seeks to guarantee the right to equal treatment and opportunities for women and men in employment and occupation, both for employees and self-employed workers, in the public and private sectors. It would modify up to seventy provisions in eight different laws.
- It would require negotiating positive actions in favor of women in collective bargaining when clear factual inequalities compared to men exist, in labor relations, public employment and economically dependent self-employed work. Failure to comply would lead to liability under a system of infractions and penalties.
- It recognizes work-life balance as an individual, non-transferable right of each worker, and requires employers to take it into account in decisions such as uneven work-hour distribution, geographic relocation or substantial changes in working conditions.
- It would reform family leave: birth leave for the mother would be reduced to six mandatory weeks, a six-week birth leave would be introduced for the other parent, and a ten-week leave per parent would be created to care for a child under twelve months. If both parents exercise these rights on an equivalent basis, the periods are extended.
- It recognizes the right to request an adjustment of working hours, including remote work, and reduced hours for infant care. If both parents exercise it on an equivalent basis, the reduction can extend until the baby turns twelve months old.
- It strengthens protection against dismissal: dismissal during the probationary period due to pregnancy or maternity would be null and void, as would the dismissal of a female victim of gender violence Violence a woman suffers from a current or former partner because she is a woman. for exercising her right to effective judicial protection.
- It creates the State Office for the Fight against Discrimination on Grounds of Sex in Employment and Occupation, part of the Labor Inspectorate, which would compile statistics to prove inequalities and support the duty to negotiate positive actions.
- It sets fines depending on the seriousness of the infraction: minor ones from €60 to €625, serious ones from €626 to €6,250 and very serious ones from €6,251 to €50,000.
Who it affects
- Employees in the public or private sector: They would gain equality and work-life balance rights, such as adjusted working hours and family leave.
- Self-employed workers: They could suspend their activity to care for children and would have new guarantees against discriminatory termination.
- Employers: They would have a duty to negotiate positive actions and could be fined for non-compliance.
- Public employees: Work-life balance leave and positive actions in internal promotion would be recognized.
- Victims of gender violence: They would have new protection against dismissal and grounds to interrupt training contracts.
Words worth knowing
- Acciones positivas (positive actions)
- Specific measures in favor of women to correct factual inequality compared to men.
- Negociación colectiva (collective bargaining)
- Negotiation between unions and employers or public administrations to set working conditions in collective agreements.
- Acuerdos de interés profesional (professional interest agreements)
- Agreements regulating the working conditions of economically dependent self-employed people.
- Excedencia (unpaid leave)
- A situation in which the worker stops providing services and receiving wages, but keeps certain rights and can return to the job.
- Presencia o composición equilibrada (balanced presence)
- A principle requiring that a body or list include a sufficient presence of both women and men.
- gender violence
- Violence a woman suffers from a current or former partner because she is a woman.
It summarizes the text as it was introduced. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries
Where it stands
How far did it get?
It took 4 of 7 steps. It reached Committee, and today it is unfinished.
- Introduced1 August 2018Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
- Admitted4 September 2018The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
- Amendments26 October 2018Groups propose changes.
- Committee19 December 2018A committee goes through the text in detail.
- Plenarynot reachedAll 350 deputies vote.
- Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
- BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 10 official steps on a timeline
16 October 2018
How did the plenary vote?
Voted on: Private member's bill by the Socialist Parliamentary Group, to guarantee equal treatment and equal opportunities between women and men in employment and occupation.
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 1 of sitting 148· updated 10 Nov
Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.
Your province
How did the deputies from your province vote?
And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.
Or see how most of each province voted
- A Coruña More votes in favour 8 yes · 0 no
- Albacete More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no
- Alicante/Alacant More votes in favour 12 yes · 0 no
- Almería More votes in favour 6 yes · 0 no
- Araba/Álava More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no
- Asturias More votes in favour 8 yes · 0 no
- Ávila More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no
- Badajoz More votes in favour 5 yes · 0 no · 1 abst.
- Barcelona More votes in favour 30 yes · 0 no
- Bizkaia More votes in favour 8 yes · 0 no
- Burgos More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no
- Cáceres More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no
- Cádiz More votes in favour 9 yes · 0 no
- Cantabria More votes in favour 5 yes · 0 no
- Castellón/Castelló More votes in favour 5 yes · 0 no
- Ceuta More votes in favour 1 yes · 0 no
- Ciudad Real More votes in favour 5 yes · 0 no
- Córdoba More votes in favour 6 yes · 0 no
- Cuenca More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no
- Gipuzkoa More votes in favour 5 yes · 0 no
- Girona More votes in favour 6 yes · 0 no
- Granada More votes in favour 7 yes · 0 no
- Guadalajara More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no
- Huelva More votes in favour 5 yes · 0 no
- Huesca More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no
- Illes Balears More votes in favour 8 yes · 0 no
- Jaén More votes in favour 5 yes · 0 no
- La Rioja More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no
- Las Palmas More votes in favour 8 yes · 0 no
- León More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no
- Lleida More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no
- Lugo More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no
- Madrid More votes in favour 36 yes · 0 no
- Málaga More votes in favour 11 yes · 0 no
- Melilla More votes in favour 1 yes · 0 no
- Murcia More votes in favour 10 yes · 0 no
- Navarra More votes in favour 5 yes · 0 no
- Ourense More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no
- Palencia More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no
- Pontevedra More votes in favour 7 yes · 0 no
- Salamanca More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no
- Santa Cruz de Tenerife More votes in favour 7 yes · 0 no
- Segovia More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no
- Sevilla More votes in favour 12 yes · 0 no
- Soria More votes in favour 2 yes · 0 no
- Tarragona More votes in favour 6 yes · 0 no
- Teruel More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no
- Toledo More votes in favour 6 yes · 0 no
- Valencia/València More votes in favour 16 yes · 0 no
- Valladolid More votes in favour 5 yes · 0 no
- Zamora More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no
- Zaragoza More votes in favour 7 yes · 0 no
More details: how each group and each province voted
The groups
Who voted in favour and who against?
In favour, most of Socialista, Vasco (EAJ-PNV), Mixto, Ciudadanos, Gcup-ec-em, GER and Popular en el Congreso. 1 deputy voted differently from their group.
By province: in 52 most voted in favour; in 0, against.
Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.
- In favour: 52
- Against: 0
| Group | Seats | How it voted |
|---|---|---|
| Socialista | 84 | 83 in favour · 1 abst. |
| Vasco (EAJ-PNV) | 5 | 5 in favour |
| Mixto | 19 | 17 in favour · 2 did not vote |
| Ciudadanos | 32 | 31 in favour · 1 did not vote |
| Gcup-ec-em | 67 | 67 in favour |
| GER | 9 | 9 in favour |
| Popular en el Congreso | 134 | 133 in favour · 1 did not vote |
What happens next
What happens now?
The legislature ended before it finished. To go on, someone would have to introduce it again in the new Cortes.
It was presented again:
- XIII Legislature, Congreso de los Diputados· Withdrawn Private member's bill to guarantee equal treatment and opportunities between women and men in employment and occupation.
- XIII Legislature, Congreso de los Diputados· Unfinished Bill to guarantee equal treatment for women and men at work
Sources
Where does all this come from?
- Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000268
Official title, type, author, dates and stage.
Retrieved 11 November 2026
- Congreso de los Diputados, vote 1 of sitting 148
The count and every seat’s vote.
Retrieved 10 November 2026
- The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
- Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
- We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.