Skip to content

Where are you from?

Choose your province and we will tell you how the deputies and senators you elected vote, one by one.

 

We remember it in this browser. If you create an account, we keep it there.

Type a law, a topic, a person or a province.

What it is

Proposal to strengthen equality between women and men at work

Admitted step 2 of 7 · Unfinished

It is a members’ bill. Introduced by parliamentary groups, the Senate, regional governments or citizens. It was introduced on 7 March 2018. Introduced by: Grupo Parlamentario Socialista.

Official title: Private member's bill to guarantee equal treatment and opportunities between women and men in employment and occupation.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000203· updated 11 Nov

Automatic summary, not yet reviewed

  1. The bill would guarantee equal treatment and opportunities for women and men in employment and occupation, both for employees and self-employed people, in the public and private sectors. It would cover access to jobs, training, promotion, working conditions and dismissal.
  2. It would require negotiating positive actions in favor of women when clear situations of de facto inequality compared to men exist, in collective bargaining, public employment and self-employment. Failing to do so would be punished with fines from €60 to €50,000.
  3. It would recognize work-life balance as an individual, non-transferable right of each worker. Employers would have to take it into account when distributing working hours, relocating staff or changing working conditions.
  4. It would reform family leave: birth leave for the mother would be reduced to six mandatory weeks, a six-week leave would be created for the other parent, and each parent would get ten weeks to care for a child under twelve months. If both parents use these rights on an equivalent basis, the leaves would be extended.
  5. It would recognize the right to request an adjustment of working hours, including remote work, and reduced hours to care for a nursing infant. If both parents use it on an equivalent basis, it could extend until the baby turns twelve months old.
  6. It would strengthen protection against dismissal: firing a worker for pregnancy or maternity during the trial period would be null and void, as would firing a victim of gender violence Violence a woman suffers from a current or former partner because she is a woman. for exercising her right to court protection, or ending a self-employed woman's contract for pregnancy, maternity or family duties.
  7. It would create the State Office against Discrimination based on sex in employment and occupation, part of the Labor Inspectorate, which would compile statistics to prove inequalities and support collective bargaining.
  8. It would set up a system of minor, serious and very serious offenses for obstructing or preventing work-life balance, ignoring positive actions or skipping the balanced composition of bargaining committees, with the corresponding financial penalties.

Who it affects

  • Employees, in private companies and public employment: They would gain new equality and work-life balance rights, such as adjusted working hours and individual, non-transferable family leaves.
  • Self-employed workers, including economically dependent ones: They could suspend their activity to care for children and would be protected against discriminatory terminations for pregnancy or maternity.
  • Companies and Public Administrations: They would have a duty to negotiate positive actions in favor of women and could be fined if they fail to comply.
  • Working women who are victims of gender violence: They would have stronger protection against dismissal and new grounds to interrupt contracts and trial periods.
  • Members of cooperatives: Cooperatives would have to include equality measures in their bylaws and provide statistical data broken down by sex.

Words worth knowing

Acciones positivas (positive actions)
Specific measures in favor of women to correct situations of de facto inequality compared to men, as long as they are reasonable and proportionate.
Discriminación directa e indirecta (direct and indirect discrimination)
Direct discrimination is worse treatment because of sex; indirect discrimination is a seemingly neutral rule or practice that harms one sex.
Presencia o composición equilibrada (balanced presence or composition)
A rule requiring that a body or list include enough women and men, so that neither sex holds an excessive majority.
Conciliación de la vida personal, familiar y laboral (work-life balance)
The right to combine work with personal and family life through leaves, schedule adjustments and other measures.
Excedencia (unpaid leave)
A situation in which a worker stops providing services and receiving pay, but keeps the right to return to their job within certain time limits.
gender violence
Violence a woman suffers from a current or former partner because she is a woman.

It summarizes the text as it was introduced. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries

Where it stands

How far did it get?

It took 2 of 7 steps. It reached Admitted, and today it is unfinished.

  1. Introduced7 March 2018Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
  2. Admitted13 March 2018The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
  3. Amendmentsnot reachedGroups propose changes.
  4. Committeenot reachedA committee goes through the text in detail.
  5. Plenarynot reachedAll 350 deputies vote.
  6. Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
  7. BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 6 official steps on a timeline
Mar 2018Jun 2018Sept 2018Dec 201811. 7 March 2018: Presentación22. 13 March 2018: Boletín Oficial de las Cortes Generales Publicación desde 13/03/2018 hasta 16/03/201833. 13 March 2018: Calificación44. 16 March 2018: Gobierno Contestación desde 16/03/2018 hasta 04/09/2018 Nota: (Comunicación disconformidad - Solicitud mayor información por acuerdo de Mesa de 07/06/2018).55. 4 September 2018: Pleno Toma en consideración desde 04/09/2018 hasta 05/03/2019 Nota: (Nuevo criterio del Gobierno 19/07/2018).66. 5 March 2019: Concluido - (Caducado) desde 05/03/2019 hasta 27/03/2019

Was there a plenary vote?

We have no plenary vote linked to this law in the Congreso’s data.

What happens next

What happens now?

The legislature ended before it finished. To go on, someone would have to introduce it again in the new Cortes.

It was presented again:

Sources

Where does all this come from?

  • The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
  • Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
  • We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.