Skip to content

Where are you from?

Choose your province and we will tell you how the deputies and senators you elected vote, one by one.

 

We remember it in this browser. If you create an account, we keep it there.

Type a law, a topic, a person or a province.

What it is

Proposal to halt the rollout of the LOMCE Ley Orgánica 8/2013, de 9 de diciembre, para la Mejora de la Calidad Educativa. The education law this bill seeks to halt. education law

Amendments step 3 of 7 · Unfinished

It is a members’ bill. Introduced by parliamentary groups, the Senate, regional governments or citizens. It was introduced on 20 July 2016. Introduced by: Grupo Parlamentario Socialista.

Official title: Private member's organic bill on the suspension of the implementation schedule of Organic Law 8/2013, of December 9, for the Improvement of Educational Quality.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 122/000001· updated 11 Nov

Automatic summary, not yet reviewed

  1. The bill would suspend the rollout calendar of the LOMCE and also the entry into force of the rules that develop it and that are not yet actually in effect.
  2. The Government would have to negotiate with regional governments, the education community, social partners and political parties, and then send Parliament a new basic education law that repeals the LOMCE.
  3. The Government would be allowed to issue the rules needed to carry out and develop this law.
  4. The law would take effect on the day it is published in the Official State Gazette (Boletín Oficial del Estado).

Who it affects

  • Students and schools: The LOMCE rollout calendar would stop being applied.
  • Autonomous communities: They would not have to comply with LOMCE implementing rules not yet in force.
  • The Government: It would have to negotiate a new education agreement and submit a law repealing the LOMCE.

Words worth knowing

LOMCE
Ley Orgánica 8/2013, de 9 de diciembre, para la Mejora de la Calidad Educativa. The education law this bill seeks to halt.
Proposición de ley
A bill introduced by a parliamentary group. It is not an approved law until it goes through the legislative process.
Disposición final
Final provision of a law, which regulates how it is applied, developed or when it takes effect.

It summarizes the text as it was introduced. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries

Where it stands

How far did it get?

It took 3 of 7 steps. It reached Amendments, and today it is unfinished.

  1. Introduced20 July 2016Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
  2. Admitted6 September 2016The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
  3. Amendments25 November 2016Groups propose changes.
  4. Committeenot reachedA committee goes through the text in detail.
  5. Plenarynot reachedThe deputies vote, usually in the plenary; some laws are passed by a committee without going to it.
  6. Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
  7. BOEnot reachedThe King gives royal assent and it is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE). It comes into force on the date it sets, or after 20 days if it sets none.
See the 10 official steps on a timeline
Dec 2016Dec 2017Dec 201811. 20 July 2016: Presentación22. 6 September 2016: Boletín Oficial de las Cortes Generales Publicación desde 06/09/2016 hasta 09/09/201633. 6 September 2016: Calificación44. 9 September 2016: Gobierno Contestación desde 09/09/2016 hasta 14/10/201655. 18 October 2016: Pleno Toma en consideración desde 18/10/2016 hasta 15/11/201666. 15 November 2016: Mesa del Congreso Acuerdo subsiguiente a la toma en consideración desde 15/11/2016 hasta 22/11/201677. 22 November 2016: Comisión de Educación y Deporte Publicación desde 22/11/2016 hasta 25/11/201688. 25 November 2016: Comisión de Educación y Deporte Enmiendas desde 25/11/2016 hasta 26/06/201899. 26 June 2018: Comisión de Educación y Formación Profesional Enmiendas desde 26/06/2018 hasta 05/03/20191010. 5 March 2019: Concluido - (Caducado) desde 05/03/2019 hasta 27/03/2019

15 November 2016

How did the plenary vote?

More votes in favour 208 yes · 133 no · 2 abst.

Voted on: Private member's bill by the Socialist Parliamentary Group, on the suspension of the implementation schedule of Organic Law 8/2013, of December 9, for the Improvement of Educational Quality (Organic).

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 2 of sitting 14· updated 10 Nov

Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.

Your province

How did the deputies from your province vote?

And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.

Or see how most of each province voted
More details: how each group and each province voted

The groups

Who voted in favour and who against?

In favour, most of Socialista, Vasco (EAJ-PNV), Mixto, Ciudadanos, Gcup-ec-em and GER. Against, most of Popular en el Congreso. 3 deputies voted differently from their group.

By province: in 27 most voted in favour; in 13, against.

Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.

  • In favour: 27
  • Against: 13
  • Tie: 12
Result by parliamentary group
GroupSeatsHow it voted
Socialista84
82 in favour · 2 did not vote
Vasco (EAJ-PNV)5
5 in favour
Mixto19
15 in favour · 1 against · 2 abst. · 1 did not vote
Ciudadanos32
32 in favour
Gcup-ec-em67
66 in favour · 1 did not vote
GER9
8 in favour · 1 did not vote
Popular en el Congreso134
132 against · 2 did not vote

What happens next

What happens now?

The legislature ended before it finished. To go on, someone would have to introduce it again in the new Cortes.

It has not been presented again yet.

Presented before in:

Sources

Where does all this come from?

  • The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
  • Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
  • We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.