Skip to content

Where are you from?

Choose your province and we will tell you how the deputies and senators you elected vote, one by one.

 

We remember it in this browser. If you create an account, we keep it there.

Type a law, a topic, a person or a province.

What it is

Bill to guarantee health care, housing and utilities for people in need

Amendments step 3 of 7 · Unfinished

It is a members’ bill. Introduced by parliamentary groups, the Senate, regional governments or citizens. It was introduced on 13 January 2016. Introduced by: Iglesias Turrión, Pablo y 57 Diputados.

Official title: Private member's bill 25 on social emergency.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 123/000001· updated 11 Nov

Automatic summary, not yet reviewed

  1. The bill would restore universal health care and access to medication by removing the rules of royal decree-law A rule with the force of law that the Government passes because it is urgent. It usually applies from its publication, but the Congreso must validate it within 30 days of its promulgation or it lapses. 16/2012 that left some people out of the system.
  2. It would ban the eviction of the main home of people in social exclusion or emergency unless they are first offered a housing alternative.
  3. It would require large housing holders (banks, investment funds and asset managers) to cooperate with public authorities, keep a registry of empty apartments, and offer a housing alternative before a court-ordered eviction.
  4. It would recognize the right to rehousing through social rental housing for at least three years, costing no more than 30% of the family's income, or 15% if income is below the minimum wage.
  5. It would guarantee women who are victims of male violence access to public housing, with several ways to prove the situation of violence, including social services reports, and a maximum decision period of 30 days.
  6. It would create a voucher to help vulnerable households pay for electricity and gas, with a minimum vital consumption whose discount could reach 100%, and would ban cutting off supply to these households while their case is being reviewed.

Who it affects

  • People at risk of losing their main home over unpaid bills: They could not be evicted without first being offered a housing alternative.
  • Banks, investment funds and large housing asset managers: They would have to register empty apartments and help rehouse evicted families.
  • Women who are victims of male violence: They would have guaranteed and fast access to public housing.
  • Households unable to pay for electricity and gas: They would receive a support voucher and could not have their supply cut off while their case is reviewed.
  • People without papers or a residence permit: They could hold the rights in the bill if they meet its requirements, regardless of nationality.

Words worth knowing

Lanzamiento (forzoso)
Eviction: the forced removal of a person from their home by order of an authority.
Gran tenedor de vivienda
Large housing holder: an entity owning many homes, such as banks, investment funds or asset managers.
Alquiler social
Social rental: public housing rented at an affordable price to low-income families.
Consumo Mínimo Vital
Minimum vital consumption: the basic amount of electricity and gas each household needs, set yearly by the Government.
Silencio administrativo positivo
Positive administrative silence: if the administration does not answer in time, the answer is deemed favorable to the applicant.
royal decree-law
A rule with the force of law that the Government passes because it is urgent. It usually applies from its publication, but the Congreso must validate it within 30 days of its promulgation or it lapses.
decree-law
A rule with the force of law that the Government passes because it is urgent. It usually applies from its publication, but the Congreso must validate it within 30 days of its promulgation or it lapses.

It summarizes the text as it was introduced. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries

Where it stands

How far did it get?

It took 3 of 7 steps. It reached Amendments, and today it is unfinished.

  1. Introduced13 January 2016Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
  2. Admitted2 February 2016The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
  3. Amendments22 April 2016Groups propose changes.
  4. Committeenot reachedA committee goes through the text in detail.
  5. Plenarynot reachedThe deputies vote, usually in the plenary; some laws are passed by a committee without going to it.
  6. Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
  7. BOEnot reachedThe King gives royal assent and it is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE). It comes into force on the date it sets, or after 20 days if it sets none.
See the 10 official steps on a timeline
Jan 2016Feb 2016Mar 2016Apr 201611. 13 January 2016: Presentación22. 2 February 2016: Mesa del Congreso Requerimiento de antecedentes desde 02/02/2016 hasta 10/02/201633. 2 February 2016: Boletín Oficial de las Cortes Generales Publicación desde 02/02/2016 hasta 10/02/201644. 2 February 2016: Calificación55. 10 February 2016: Gobierno Contestación desde 10/02/2016 hasta 17/03/201666. 17 March 2016: Pleno Toma en consideración desde 17/03/2016 hasta 12/04/201677. 12 April 2016: Mesa del Congreso Acuerdo subsiguiente a la toma en consideración desde 12/04/2016 hasta 14/04/201688. 19 April 2016: Comisión de Sanidad y Servicios Sociales Publicación desde 19/04/2016 hasta 22/04/201699. 22 April 2016: Comisión de Sanidad y Servicios Sociales Enmiendas desde 22/04/2016 hasta 03/05/20161010. 3 May 2016: Concluido - (Caducado) desde 03/05/2016 hasta 20/05/2016

12 April 2016

How did the plenary vote?

More votes in favour 167 yes · 114 no · 52 abst.

Voted on: Proposición de Ley del Sr. Iglesias Turrión y otros 57 Diputados, 25 de emergencia social.

Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 2 of sitting 8· updated 10 Nov

Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.

Your province

How did the deputies from your province vote?

And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.

Or see how most of each province voted
More details: how each group and each province voted

The groups

Who voted in favour and who against?

In favour, most of Socialista, Mixto, GER and Gp-ec-em. Against, most of Popular en el Congreso. 3 deputies voted differently from their group.

By province: in 25 most voted in favour; in 13, against.

Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.

  • In favour: 25
  • Against: 13
  • Tie: 14
Result by parliamentary group
GroupSeatsHow it voted
Socialista89
87 in favour · 2 did not vote
Vasco (EAJ-PNV)6
6 abst.
Mixto14
9 in favour · 3 against · 2 did not vote
Ciudadanos40
40 abst.
Gc-dl8
6 abst. · 2 did not vote
GER9
9 in favour
Gp-ec-em65
62 in favour · 3 did not vote
Popular en el Congreso119
111 against · 8 did not vote

What happens next

What happens now?

The legislature ended before it finished. To go on, someone would have to introduce it again in the new Cortes.

It has not been presented again yet.

Sources

Where does all this come from?

  • The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
  • Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
  • We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.