What it is
Bill to guarantee health care, housing and utilities for people in need
It is a members’ bill. Introduced by parliamentary groups, the Senate, regional governments or citizens. It was introduced on 13 January 2016. Introduced by: Iglesias Turrión, Pablo y 57 Diputados.
Official title: Private member's bill 25 on social emergency.
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 123/000001· updated 11 Nov
Automatic summary, not yet reviewed
- The bill would restore universal health care and access to medication by removing the rules of royal decree-law A rule with the force of law that the Government passes because it is urgent. It usually applies from its publication, but the Congreso must validate it within 30 days of its promulgation or it lapses. 16/2012 that left some people out of the system.
- It would ban the eviction of the main home of people in social exclusion or emergency unless they are first offered a housing alternative.
- It would require large housing holders (banks, investment funds and asset managers) to cooperate with public authorities, keep a registry of empty apartments, and offer a housing alternative before a court-ordered eviction.
- It would recognize the right to rehousing through social rental housing for at least three years, costing no more than 30% of the family's income, or 15% if income is below the minimum wage.
- It would guarantee women who are victims of male violence access to public housing, with several ways to prove the situation of violence, including social services reports, and a maximum decision period of 30 days.
- It would create a voucher to help vulnerable households pay for electricity and gas, with a minimum vital consumption whose discount could reach 100%, and would ban cutting off supply to these households while their case is being reviewed.
Who it affects
- People at risk of losing their main home over unpaid bills: They could not be evicted without first being offered a housing alternative.
- Banks, investment funds and large housing asset managers: They would have to register empty apartments and help rehouse evicted families.
- Women who are victims of male violence: They would have guaranteed and fast access to public housing.
- Households unable to pay for electricity and gas: They would receive a support voucher and could not have their supply cut off while their case is reviewed.
- People without papers or a residence permit: They could hold the rights in the bill if they meet its requirements, regardless of nationality.
Words worth knowing
- Lanzamiento (forzoso)
- Eviction: the forced removal of a person from their home by order of an authority.
- Gran tenedor de vivienda
- Large housing holder: an entity owning many homes, such as banks, investment funds or asset managers.
- Alquiler social
- Social rental: public housing rented at an affordable price to low-income families.
- Consumo Mínimo Vital
- Minimum vital consumption: the basic amount of electricity and gas each household needs, set yearly by the Government.
- Silencio administrativo positivo
- Positive administrative silence: if the administration does not answer in time, the answer is deemed favorable to the applicant.
- royal decree-law
- A rule with the force of law that the Government passes because it is urgent. It usually applies from its publication, but the Congreso must validate it within 30 days of its promulgation or it lapses.
- decree-law
- A rule with the force of law that the Government passes because it is urgent. It usually applies from its publication, but the Congreso must validate it within 30 days of its promulgation or it lapses.
It summarizes the text as it was introduced. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries
Where it stands
How far did it get?
It took 3 of 7 steps. It reached Amendments, and today it is unfinished.
- Introduced13 January 2016Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
- Admitted2 February 2016The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
- Amendments22 April 2016Groups propose changes.
- Committeenot reachedA committee goes through the text in detail.
- Plenarynot reachedThe deputies vote, usually in the plenary; some laws are passed by a committee without going to it.
- Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
- BOEnot reachedThe King gives royal assent and it is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE). It comes into force on the date it sets, or after 20 days if it sets none.
See the 10 official steps on a timeline
12 April 2016
How did the plenary vote?
Voted on: Proposición de Ley del Sr. Iglesias Turrión y otros 57 Diputados, 25 de emergencia social.
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 2 of sitting 8· updated 10 Nov
Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.
Your province
How did the deputies from your province vote?
And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.
Or see how most of each province voted
- A Coruña More votes in favour 4 yes · 2 no · 1 abst.
- Albacete More votes against 1 yes · 2 no · 1 abst.
- Alicante/Alacant More votes in favour 5 yes · 3 no · 2 abst.
- Almería More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no · 1 abst.
- Araba/Álava More votes in favour 2 yes · 0 no · 1 abst.
- Asturias More votes in favour 4 yes · 3 no · 1 abst.
- Ávila More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Badajoz More votes in favour 4 yes · 2 no
- Barcelona More votes in favour 19 yes · 2 no · 6 abst.
- Bizkaia More votes in favour 4 yes · 1 no · 3 abst.
- Burgos Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Cáceres Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Cádiz More votes in favour 5 yes · 3 no · 1 abst.
- Cantabria More votes against 1 yes · 2 no · 1 abst.
- Castellón/Castelló More votes against 1 yes · 2 no · 1 abst.
- Ceuta More votes against 0 yes · 1 no
- Ciudad Real More votes against 2 yes · 3 no
- Córdoba More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no · 1 abst.
- Cuenca More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Gipuzkoa More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no · 2 abst.
- Girona More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no · 2 abst.
- Granada Tie 3 yes · 3 no · 1 abst.
- Guadalajara Tie 1 yes · 1 no · 1 abst.
- Huelva More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no
- Huesca More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Illes Balears More votes in favour 4 yes · 3 no · 1 abst.
- Jaén More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no
- La Rioja Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Las Palmas More votes in favour 4 yes · 3 no · 1 abst.
- León Tie 2 yes · 2 no · 1 abst.
- Lleida More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no · 1 abst.
- Lugo Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Madrid More votes in favour 16 yes · 11 no · 7 abst.
- Málaga Tie 4 yes · 4 no · 2 abst.
- Melilla More votes against 0 yes · 1 no
- Murcia More votes against 3 yes · 5 no · 2 abst.
- Navarra More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no
- Ourense Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Palencia More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Pontevedra More votes in favour 4 yes · 2 no
- Salamanca More votes against 1 yes · 2 no · 1 abst.
- Santa Cruz de Tenerife More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no · 1 abst.
- Segovia Tie 1 yes · 1 no
- Sevilla More votes in favour 7 yes · 3 no · 2 abst.
- Soria Tie 1 yes · 1 no
- Tarragona More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no · 2 abst.
- Teruel More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Toledo Tie 2 yes · 2 no · 1 abst.
- Valencia/València More votes in favour 8 yes · 5 no · 2 abst.
- Valladolid Tie 2 yes · 2 no · 1 abst.
- Zamora More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Zaragoza Tie 3 yes · 3 no · 1 abst.
More details: how each group and each province voted
The groups
Who voted in favour and who against?
In favour, most of Socialista, Mixto, GER and Gp-ec-em. Against, most of Popular en el Congreso. 3 deputies voted differently from their group.
By province: in 25 most voted in favour; in 13, against.
Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.
- In favour: 25
- Against: 13
- Tie: 14
| Group | Seats | How it voted |
|---|---|---|
| Socialista | 89 | 87 in favour · 2 did not vote |
| Vasco (EAJ-PNV) | 6 | 6 abst. |
| Mixto | 14 | 9 in favour · 3 against · 2 did not vote |
| Ciudadanos | 40 | 40 abst. |
| Gc-dl | 8 | 6 abst. · 2 did not vote |
| GER | 9 | 9 in favour |
| Gp-ec-em | 65 | 62 in favour · 3 did not vote |
| Popular en el Congreso | 119 | 111 against · 8 did not vote |
What happens next
What happens now?
The legislature ended before it finished. To go on, someone would have to introduce it again in the new Cortes.
It has not been presented again yet.
Sources
Where does all this come from?
- Congreso de los Diputados, file 123/000001
Official title, type, author, dates and stage.
Retrieved 11 November 2026
- Congreso de los Diputados, vote 2 of sitting 8
The count and every seat’s vote.
Retrieved 10 November 2026
- The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
- Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
- We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.