What it is
More rights to interpreters, translation and information in criminal cases
It is a government bill. Introduced by the Government. It was introduced on 2 August 2014. Introduced by: Gobierno.
Official title: Organic Government bill amending the Criminal Procedure Law and Organic Law 6/1985, of 1 July, on the Judiciary, to transpose Directive 2010/64/EU, of 20 October 2010, on the right to interpretation and translation in criminal proceedings and Directive 2012/13/EU, of 22 May 2012, on the right to information in criminal proceedings.
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, file 121/000114· updated 11 Nov
Automatic summary, not yet reviewed
- Defendants who do not speak or understand Spanish or the official language of the proceedings have the right to an interpreter in all proceedings, including police or prosecutor questioning and all court hearings, and to use an interpreter when talking with their lawyer. They also have the right to a written translation of essential documents, such as the order committing them to prison, the charging document and the judgment, and the Administration pays the costs.
- The translation must be done within a reasonable time and procedural deadlines are suspended once it is ordered. Interpreting may be provided by videoconference, unless the judge or prosecutor orders the interpreter's physical presence to protect the defendant's rights.
- Court translators and interpreters are appointed from lists drawn up by the Administration, although in urgent cases another capable person who knows the language may be temporarily authorized. If the translation or interpretation does not offer sufficient guarantees of accuracy, the judge, court or prosecutor may order checks or appoint a new professional.
- If the judge or court denies the right to interpretation or translation, the decision must be documented in writing and can be appealed. During the trial, the defense may have its objection recorded in the court record.
- Every person under criminal investigation or prosecution must receive, without unjustified delay, clear information about the acts they are accused of and about their rights: examining the case files, choosing a lawyer, applying for free legal aid, remaining silent and not incriminating themselves or pleading guilty. The information is given in understandable language, adapted to their age, maturity, disability or other personal circumstances.
- Detained or imprisoned persons must be informed in writing, immediately and in a language they understand, of the acts they are accused of, the reasons for their loss of liberty and their rights, including access to the parts of the case file needed to challenge the legality of their detention and the maximum legal length of detention. They also have the right to a free interpreter and to keep the written statement of rights throughout the detention.
Who it affects
- Defendants who do not speak or understand Spanish or the official language of the proceedings: They have free access to an interpreter and to translation of essential documents.
- People who are deaf, hard of hearing or deafblind: They can use sign language interpreters and support tools for oral communication.
- Detained or imprisoned persons: They must receive written, immediate information about the acts they are accused of, the reasons for their detention and their rights.
- Court translators and interpreters: An Official Register will be created for qualified professionals who act before the courts and the police.
- Judges, prosecutors and court staff: They must receive training on communication with the help of an interpreter in criminal proceedings.
Words worth knowing
- Imputado o acusado
- Person accused of a crime within a criminal case.
- Ley de Enjuiciamiento Criminal
- The Spanish law that governs how criminal trials work.
- Ley orgánica
- A type of Spanish law reserved for major matters such as fundamental rights; it requires stronger majorities to pass.
- Ministerio Fiscal
- The public institution that defends legality and citizens' rights in court, known as the Public Prosecutor's Office.
- Prisión provisional
- A measure by which an accused person is held in prison while the case is resolved, before the judgment.
It summarizes the law as published in the BOE. It is written by artificial intelligence and may contain mistakes: the official text is what counts. Read the official text · How we make summaries
Where it stands
How far did it get?
It took 7 of 7 steps. It reached BOE, and today it is passed.
- Introduced2 August 2014Someone registers the text in the Congreso.
- Admitted2 September 2014The Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
- Amendments5 September 2014Groups propose changes.
- Committee29 October 2014A committee goes through the text in detail.
- Plenary10 December 2014All 350 deputies vote.
- Senate18 December 2014The Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
- BOE16 April 2015It is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.
See the 10 official steps on a timeline
16 April 2015
How did the plenary vote?
Voted on: Overall vote on the Organic Government bill amending the Criminal Procedure Act and Organic Law 6/1985, of 1 July, on the Judiciary, to transpose Directive 2010/64/EU, of 20 October 2010, on the right to interpretation and translation in criminal proceedings and Directive 2012/13/EU, of 22 May 2012, on the right to information in criminal proceedings, due to its organic nature.
This law had 13 votes; this is the latest with every deputy’s vote. See them all
Source: Congreso de los Diputados, vote 12 of sitting 255· updated 10 Nov
Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.
Your province
How did the deputies from your province vote?
And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.
Or see how most of each province voted
- A Coruña More votes in favour 5 yes · 1 no · 2 abst.
- Albacete More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no · 1 abst.
- Alicante/Alacant More votes in favour 8 yes · 0 no · 4 abst.
- Almería More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no · 2 abst.
- Araba/Álava More votes in favour 1 yes · 0 no · 1 abst.
- Asturias More votes in favour 4 yes · 1 no · 3 abst.
- Ávila More votes in favour 2 yes · 0 no
- Badajoz More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no · 2 abst.
- Barcelona More votes against 5 yes · 9 no · 8 abst.
- Bizkaia More votes against 1 yes · 3 no · 1 abst.
- Burgos More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no · 1 abst.
- Cáceres More votes in favour 2 yes · 0 no · 1 abst.
- Cádiz More votes in favour 5 yes · 0 no · 3 abst.
- Cantabria More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no · 1 abst.
- Castellón/Castelló More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no · 1 abst.
- Ceuta More votes in favour 1 yes · 0 no
- Ciudad Real More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no · 2 abst.
- Córdoba More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no · 2 abst.
- Cuenca More votes in favour 2 yes · 0 no · 1 abst.
- Gipuzkoa Tie 1 yes · 1 no · 1 abst.
- Girona More votes against 1 yes · 3 no · 1 abst.
- Granada More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no · 3 abst.
- Guadalajara More votes in favour 2 yes · 0 no · 1 abst.
- Huelva More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no · 2 abst.
- Huesca More votes in favour 2 yes · 0 no · 1 abst.
- Illes Balears More votes in favour 5 yes · 0 no · 3 abst.
- Jaén More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no · 2 abst.
- La Rioja More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no · 1 abst.
- Las Palmas More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no · 2 abst.
- León More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no · 2 abst.
- Lleida Tie 1 yes · 1 no
- Lugo More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no · 1 abst.
- Madrid More votes in favour 17 yes · 1 no · 13 abst.
- Málaga More votes in favour 6 yes · 1 no · 2 abst.
- Melilla More votes in favour 1 yes · 0 no
- Murcia More votes in favour 8 yes · 0 no · 2 abst.
- Navarra More votes in favour 2 yes · 0 no · 2 abst.
- Ourense More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no · 1 abst.
- Palencia More votes in favour 2 yes · 0 no · 1 abst.
- Pontevedra More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no · 2 abst.
- Salamanca More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no · 1 abst.
- Santa Cruz de Tenerife More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no · 2 abst.
- Segovia More votes in favour 2 yes · 0 no · 1 abst.
- Sevilla More votes in favour 4 yes · 1 no · 6 abst.
- Soria More votes in favour 1 yes · 0 no · 1 abst.
- Tarragona More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Teruel More votes in favour 2 yes · 0 no · 1 abst.
- Toledo More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no · 2 abst.
- Valencia/València More votes in favour 9 yes · 1 no · 4 abst.
- Valladolid More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no · 2 abst.
- Zamora More votes in favour 2 yes · 0 no · 1 abst.
- Zaragoza More votes in favour 4 yes · 1 no · 2 abst.
More details: how each group and each province voted
The groups
Who voted in favour and who against?
In favour, most of Popular en el Congreso. Against, most of Vasco (EAJ-PNV), Mixto, GC-CiU and GIP. 5 deputies voted differently from their group.
By province: in 43 most voted in favour; in 3, against.
Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.
- In favour: 43
- Against: 3
- Abstained: 1
- Tie: 5
| Group | Seats | How it voted |
|---|---|---|
| Socialista | 110 | 94 abst. · 16 did not vote |
| Vasco (EAJ-PNV) | 5 | 4 against · 1 did not vote |
| Mixto | 18 | 2 in favour · 3 against · 2 abst. · 11 did not vote |
| GC-CiU | 16 | 11 against · 1 abst. · 4 did not vote |
| GIP | 11 | 8 against · 3 did not vote |
| GUPyD | 4 | 4 abst. |
| Sin grupo | 1 | 1 abst. |
| Popular en el Congreso | 185 | 178 in favour · 7 did not vote |
What happens next
What happens now?
It is law, or will be once published in the BOE. It comes into force on the date its own text sets.
The same initiative in the other chamber:
Sources
Where does all this come from?
- Congreso de los Diputados, file 121/000114
Official title, type, author, dates and stage.
Retrieved 11 November 2026
- Congreso de los Diputados, vote 12 of sitting 255
The count and every seat’s vote.
Retrieved 10 November 2026
- BOE, BOE-A-2015-4605
The law as published.
Retrieved 11 November 2026
- The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
- Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
- We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.