Skip to content

Where are you from?

Choose your province and we will tell you how the deputies and senators you elected vote, one by one.

 

We remember it in this browser. If you create an account, we keep it there.
Sign in

Type a law, a topic, a person or a province.

What it is

Organic Government bill amending the Criminal Procedure Law and Organic Law 6/1985, of 1 July, on the Judiciary, to transpose Directive 2010/64/EU, of 20 October 2010, on the right to interpretation and translation in criminal proceedings and Directive 2012/13/EU, of 22 May 2012, on the right to information in criminal proceedings.

No stage no data

It is a government bill. Introduced by the Government.

Follow this law

Source: Senate, file 621/000105· updated 11 Nov

We do not have a summary of this text yet, so we do not tell you what it changes: only what the official page says. Read the official page

Where it stands

How far did it get?

It took 0 of 7 steps. Its stage is not on record.

  1. Introducednot reachedSomeone registers the text in the Congreso.
  2. Admittednot reachedThe Bureau of the Congreso accepts it and, for a members’ bill, the plenary decides whether to consider it.
  3. Amendmentsnot reachedGroups propose changes.
  4. Committeenot reachedA committee goes through the text in detail.
  5. Plenarynot reachedAll 350 deputies vote.
  6. Senatenot reachedThe Senate can pass it, amend it or veto it.
  7. BOEnot reachedIt is published in the Official State Gazette (BOE) and comes into force.

25 March 2015

How did the plenary vote?

More votes in favour 141 yes · 20 no · 66 abst.

Voted on: Organic Government bill amending the Criminal Procedure Law and Organic Law 6/1985, of 1 July, on the Judiciary, to transpose Directive 2010/64/EU, of 20 October 2010, on the right to interpretation and translation in criminal proceedings and Directive 2012/13/EU, of 22 May 2012, on the right to information in criminal proceedings.

This law had 22 votes; this is the latest with every deputy’s vote. See them all

Source: Senate, vote 1048 of sitting 69· updated 10 Nov

Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.

Your province

How did the deputies from your province vote?

And your senators: the Senate does not link its votes to this law in its open data, so we cannot put them side by side here.

Or see how most of each province voted
More details: how each group and each province voted

The groups

Who voted in favour and who against?

In favour, most of Popular. Against, most of Vasco (EAJ-PNV), Mixto and Convergencia i Unio. 5 deputies voted differently from their group.

By province: in 32 most voted in favour; in 3, against.

Coloured by how most of each province’s deputies voted.

  • In favour: 32
  • Against: 3
  • Abstained: 4
  • Tie: 13
Result by parliamentary group
GroupSeatsHow it voted
Socialista55
55 abst.
Vasco (EAJ-PNV)5
5 against
Mixto6
1 in favour · 3 against · 2 abst.
Convergencia i Unio10
10 against
Entesa Pel Progrés9
9 abst.
Popular143
140 in favour · 2 against · 1 did not vote

What happens next

What happens now?

The Congreso has not yet published which stage it is at.

The same initiative in the other chamber:

Sources

Where does all this come from?

  • The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
  • Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
  • We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.

Read the full method · Report an error