Skip to content

Where are you from?

Choose your province and we will tell you how the deputies and senators you elected vote, one by one.

 

We remember it in this browser. If you create an account, we keep it there.
Sign in

Type a law, a topic, a person or a province.

Votes

What has been voted on?

Every plenary vote, day by day: the result, whether it was close, and how each group voted.

How each group voted: most of the group, yes no abstained group split

Congreso plenary

Tuesday, March 17, 2026Tuesday, March 17

2votes

Senate plenary

Wednesday, March 4, 2026Wednesday, March 4

10votes

148 to 109the closest

The closest: 148 to 109. The squares show how the majority of each group voted.

Members’ bill · a Senate vote on the text

Private member's bill amending Law 50/1981, of December 30, regulating the Organic Statute of the Public Prosecutor's Office, to guarantee ex officio action against acts of glorification of terrorism, tributes to convicted terrorists, and street violence behaviors with terrorist intent.

148 yes · 109 no · 3 abst. · 1 did not vote

More votes for than against, by 39 votes.

See all 10 votes from this daySee all 10 from this day

Congreso plenary

Thursday, February 26, 2026Thursday, February 26

27votes

171 to 171the closest

The closest: 171 to 171. The squares show how the majority of each group voted.

Non-binding motion · asks the government to act; changes no law

Non-legislative motion of the Mixed Parliamentary Group (Ms. Belarra Urteaga), for the effective guarantee of the right to comprehensive sex education in compliance with Organic Law 1/2023, of February 28, amending Organic Law 2/2010, of March 3, on sexual and reproductive health and voluntary interruption of pregnancy. Voted in the terms of the transitory amendment presented by the Republican Parliamentary Group and the Mixed Parliamentary Group (Ms. Valido García and Ms. Belarra Urteaga).

167 yes · 183 no · 0 abst.

Rejected by 16 votes.

See all 27 votes from this daySee all 27 from this day

Congreso plenary

Tuesday, February 24, 2026Tuesday, February 24

2votes

Congreso plenary

Wednesday, February 18, 2026Wednesday, February 18

12votes

170 to 163the closest

The closest: 170 to 163. The squares show how the majority of each group voted.

Non-binding motion · asks the government to act; changes no law

Non-legislative motion of the Plurinational SUMAR Parliamentary Group, on a new regulation for quick loans in defense of the consumer. Voted in the terms of the transitory amendment presented by the Socialist Parliamentary Group, the Plurinational SUMAR Parliamentary Group, the Republican Parliamentary Group and the Mixed Parliamentary Group (Ms. Valido García and Ms. Santana Perera).

176 yes · 31 no · 137 abst. · 6 did not vote

Passed by 145 votes.

Motion · asks the government to act or states a position

Motion following an urgent interpellation of the Mixed Parliamentary Group (Ms. Valido García), on the impact on the Canarian economy of the lack of application and non-compliance with current European and Spanish regulations due to its status as an Outermost Region. Voted in the terms of the transitory amendment presented by the Popular Parliamentary Group in the Congress and the Mixed Parliamentary Group (Ms. Valido García).

169 yes · 150 no · 24 abst. · 7 did not vote

Passed by 19 votes.

See all 12 votes from this daySee all 12 from this day

Senate plenary

Wednesday, February 18, 2026Wednesday, February 18

6votes

114 to 145the closest

The closest: 114 to 145. The squares show how the majority of each group voted.

Vote

Proposal to raise a conflict of attributions between the Senate and the Government so that, in accordance with Article 188 of the Rules of Procedure of the Chamber, the Plenary of the Senate formally requests the Government so that its President proceeds to hold his appearance before the Plenary of the Senate to report on the railway accidents in Adamuz (Córdoba) on the high-speed line on January 18, 2026, and on the R1 and R4 lines of Rodalies de Catalunya on January 20, 2026, considering that such non-appearance has violated the function of the Senate of control over the Government recognized in Articles 66.1 and 110.1 of the Constitution and in Article 182 of the Rules of Procedure of the Senate.

147 yes · 92 no · 6 abst. · 17 did not vote

More votes for than against, by 55 votes.