Skip to content

Where are you from?

Choose your province and we will tell you how the deputies and senators you elected vote, one by one.

 

We remember it in this browser. If you create an account, we keep it there.
Sign in

Type a law, a topic, a person or a province.

18 February 2026, in the Senate

Proposal to raise a conflict of attributions between the Senate and the Government so that, in accordance with Article 188 of the Rules of Procedure of the Chamber, the Plenary of the Senate formally requests the Government so that its President proceeds to hold his appearance before the Plenary of the Senate to report on the railway accidents in Adamuz (Córdoba) on the high-speed line on January 18, 2026, and on the R1 and R4 lines of Rodalies de Catalunya on January 20, 2026, considering that such non-appearance has violated the function of the Senate of control over the Government recognized in Articles 66.1 and 110.1 of the Constitution and in Article 182 of the Rules of Procedure of the Senate.

More votes in favour 147 yes · 92 no · 6 abst.

More votes in favour: 147 yes and 92 no, a margin of 55. 6 abstentions and 17 did not vote.

When we cannot be sure which majority was needed, we do not say whether this means it “passed”: the official file does not say.

Source: Senate, vote 6 of sitting 70· updated 12 Nov

The chamber

Who voted how?

147 in favour, 92 against. 6 abstentions and 17 did not vote. 1 voted differently from their group.

Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.

Your province

How did the senators from your province vote?

Only senators elected in a province or island appear. Senators appointed by regional parliaments have no province.

Or see how most of each province voted

The groups

How did each group vote?

In favour, most of Mixto and Popular en el Senado. Against, most of Izquierda Confederal (Más Madrid, Eivissa i Formentera Al Senat, Compromís, Agrupación Socialista Gomera y Geroa Bai) and Socialista.

Result by parliamentary group
GroupSeatsHow it voted
Izquierdas Por la Independencia (Esquerra Republicana-euskal Herria Bildu)9
9 did not vote
Izquierda Confederal (Más Madrid, Eivissa i Formentera Al Senat, Compromís, Agrupación Socialista Gomera y Geroa Bai)6
2 against · 4 did not vote
Socialista89
89 against
Vasco en el Senado (EAJ-PNV)6
1 against · 5 abst.
Plural en el Senado Junts per Catalunya-coalición Canaria-agrupación Herreña Independiente-bloque Nacionalista Galego5
1 abst. · 4 did not vote
Mixto4
4 in favour
Popular en el Senado143
143 in favour

Sources

Where does all this come from?

Official wording of what was voted on: Propuesta de planteamiento de un conflicto de atribuciones entre el Senado y el Gobierno para que, de conformidad con lo establecido en el artículo 188 del Reglamento de la Cámara, el Pleno del Senado requiera formalmente al Gobierno a fin de que su Presidente proceda a la celebración de su comparecencia, ante el Pleno del Senado, para dar cuenta de los accidentes ferroviarios de Adamuz (Córdoba) en la línea de alta velocidad, el 18 de enero de 2026, y en las líneas R1 y R4 de Rodalies de Catalunya, el 20 de enero de 2026, por considerar que dicha incomparecencia ha vulnerado la función del Senado de control al Gobierno reconocida en los artículos 66.1 y 110.1 de la Constitución y en el artículo 182 del Reglamento del Senado.

  • The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
  • Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
  • We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.

Read the full method · Report an error