9 September 2026, in the Senate

Proposal to raise a conflict of attributions between the Senate and the Government so that, in accordance with what is established in Article 188 of the Senate Rules of Procedure, the Plenary of the Senate formally requests the Government to proceed for the Ministers of Interior, Defense and Foreign Affairs, European Union and Cooperation to appear, respectively, before the Committees on Interior, Defense and Foreign Affairs to report on the matters indicated in the convocations of the extraordinary sessions that took place on August 12, 13, 17 and 20, 2026, all related to the crisis caused by the invasion of immigrants that occurred in Ceuta, considering that their non-appearance in the indicated sessions has violated the Senate's function of oversight of the Government recognized in Articles 66.2, 73.2 and 110.1 of the Constitution, and in Articles 66 and 70 of the Senate Rules of Procedure.

More votes in favour 146 yes · 91 no · 16 abst.

More votes in favour: 146 yes and 91 no, a margin of 55. 16 abstentions and 5 did not vote.

When we cannot be sure which majority was needed, we do not say whether this means it “passed”: the official file does not say.

Source: Senate, vote 70 of sitting 81· updated 12 Nov

The chamber

Who voted how?

146 in favour, 91 against. 16 abstentions and 5 did not vote. 2 voted differently from their group.

Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.

Your province

How did the senators from your province vote?

Only senators elected in a province or island appear. Senators appointed by regional parliaments have no province.

Or see how most of each province voted

The groups

How did each group vote?

In favour, most of Mixto and Popular en el Senado. Against, most of Izquierda Confederal (Más Madrid, Eivissa i Formentera Al Senat, Compromís, Agrupación Socialista Gomera y Geroa Bai), Socialista and Vasco en el Senado (EAJ-PNV).

Result by parliamentary group
Group	Seats	How it voted
Izquierdas Por la Independencia (Esquerra Republicana-euskal Herria Bildu)	8	8 abst.
Izquierda Confederal (Más Madrid, Eivissa i Formentera Al Senat, Compromís, Agrupación Socialista Gomera y Geroa Bai)	6	4 against · 2 abst.
Socialista	85	85 against
Vasco en el Senado (EAJ-PNV)	6	2 against · 4 did not vote
Plural en el Senado Junts per Catalunya-coalición Canaria-agrupación Herreña Independiente-bloque Nacionalista Galego	7	6 abst. · 1 did not vote
Mixto	7	7 in favour
Popular en el Senado	139	139 in favour

Sources

Where does all this come from?

Official wording of what was voted on: Propuesta de planteamiento de un conflicto de atribuciones entre el Senado y el Gobierno para que, de conformidad con lo establecido en el artículo 188 del Reglamento del Senado, el Pleno del Senado requiera formalmente al Gobierno que se proceda por los ministros de Interior, Defensa y Asuntos Exteriores, Unión Europea y Cooperación a comparecer, respectivamente, ante las Comisiones de Interior, Defensa y Asuntos Exteriores para dar cuenta de los asuntos señalados en las convocatorias de las sesiones extraordinarias que tuvieron lugar los días 12, 13, 17 y 20 de agosto de 2026, todos ellos relacionados con la crisis ocasionada por la invasión de inmigrantes ocurrida en Ceuta, por considerar que su incomparecencia en las sesiones indicadas ha vulnerado la función del Senado de control al Gobierno reconocida en los artículos 66.2, 73.2 y 110.1 de la Constitución, y en los artículos 66 y 70 del Reglamento del Senado.

Senate, vote 70 of sitting 81
The count and every seat’s vote.

Retrieved 12 November 2026

The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.

Read the full method · Report an error