Skip to content

Where are you from?

Choose your province and we will tell you how the deputies and senators you elected vote, one by one.

 

We remember it in this browser. If you create an account, we keep it there.

Type a law, a topic, a person or a province.

18 June 2025, in the Senate

Proposal for the reform of Articles 133, 160 to 166, 168 and 169 of the Rules of Procedure of the Senate (formerly known as Proposal for the reform of Articles 133, 163, 164, 165, 166, 168 and 169 of the Rules of Procedure of the Senate).

More votes against 3 yes · 143 no · 1 abst.

More votes against: 143 no and 3 yes, a margin of 140. 1 abstention and 112 did not vote.

No stage no data Proposal for the reform of Articles 133, 160 to 166, 168 and 169 of the Rules of Procedure of the Senate (formerly known as Proposal for the reform of Articles 133, 163, 164, 165, 166, 168 and 169 of the Rules of Procedure of the Senate).

When we cannot be sure which majority was needed, we do not say whether this means it “passed”: the official file does not say.

Source: Senate, vote 8 of sitting 54· updated 12 Nov

The chamber

Who voted how?

3 in favour, 143 against. 1 abstention and 112 did not vote. 1 voted differently from their group.

Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.

Your province

How did the senators from your province vote?

Only senators elected in a province or island appear. Senators appointed by regional parliaments have no province.

Or see how most of each province voted

The groups

How did each group vote?

In favour, most of Mixto. Against, most of Popular en el Senado.

Result by parliamentary group
GroupSeatsHow it voted
Izquierdas Por la Independencia (Esquerra Republicana-euskal Herria Bildu)7
7 did not vote
Izquierda Confederal (Más Madrid, Eivissa i Formentera Al Senat, Compromís, Agrupación Socialista Gomera y Geroa Bai)6
6 did not vote
Socialista87
1 abst. · 86 did not vote
Vasco en el Senado (EAJ-PNV)6
6 did not vote
Plural en el Senado Junts per Catalunya-coalición Canaria-agrupación Herreña Independiente-bloque Nacionalista Galego6
6 did not vote
Mixto4
3 in favour · 1 against
Popular en el Senado143
142 against · 1 did not vote

Sources

Where does all this come from?

Official wording of what was voted on: Propuesta de reforma de los artículos 133, 160 a 166, 168 y 169 del Reglamento del Senado (antes denominada Propuesta de reforma de los artículos 133, 163, 164, 165, 166, 168 y 169 del Reglamento del Senado).

  • The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
  • Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
  • We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.