Skip to content

Where are you from?

Choose your province and we will tell you how the deputies and senators you elected vote, one by one.

 

We remember it in this browser. If you create an account, we keep it there.

Type a law, a topic, a person or a province.

9 April 2025, in the Senate

Proposal to raise a conflict of attributions between the Senate and the Government so that, in accordance with Article 188 of the Chamber's Rules, the Senate Plenary formally requests the Government to revoke its agreement, signed by the Secretary of State for Relations with the Cortes and Constitutional Affairs, dated March 17, 2025, sent to the President of the Congress of Deputies, of non-conformity regarding the processing of amendments numbers 5, by Senators Mr. Joan Baptista Bagué Roura and Mr. Eduardo Pujol Bonell, of the Plural Parliamentary Group in the Senate Junts per Catalunya-Coalición Canaria-Agrupación Herreña Independiente-Bloque Nacionalista Galego; 109 and 110, of the Lefts for Independence Parliamentary Group (Esquerra Republicana-Euskal Herria Bildu); and 104, of the Popular Parliamentary Group in the Senate, approved by the Senate Plenary in relation to the Government bill on the prevention of food losses and waste.

More votes in favour 148 yes · 94 no · 18 abst.

More votes in favour: 148 yes and 94 no, a margin of 54. 18 abstentions and 1 did not vote.

When we cannot be sure which majority was needed, we do not say whether this means it “passed”: the official file does not say.

Source: Senate, vote 5 of sitting 48· updated 12 Nov

The chamber

Who voted how?

148 in favour, 94 against. 18 abstentions and 1 did not vote. 5 voted differently from their group.

Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.

Your province

How did the senators from your province vote?

Only senators elected in a province or island appear. Senators appointed by regional parliaments have no province.

Or see how most of each province voted

The groups

How did each group vote?

In favour, most of Plural en el Senado Junts per Catalunya-coalición Canaria-agrupación Herreña Independiente-bloque Nacionalista Galego and Popular en el Senado. Against, most of Socialista and Mixto.

Result by parliamentary group
GroupSeatsHow it voted
Izquierdas Por la Independencia (Esquerra Republicana-euskal Herria Bildu)8
8 abst.
Izquierda Confederal (Más Madrid, Eivissa i Formentera Al Senat, Compromís, Agrupación Socialista Gomera y Geroa Bai)4
1 against · 3 abst.
Socialista89
89 against
Vasco en el Senado (EAJ-PNV)6
1 against · 5 abst.
Plural en el Senado Junts per Catalunya-coalición Canaria-agrupación Herreña Independiente-bloque Nacionalista Galego7
4 in favour · 2 abst. · 1 did not vote
Mixto4
1 in favour · 3 against
Popular en el Senado143
143 in favour

Sources

Where does all this come from?

Official wording of what was voted on: Propuesta de planteamiento de un conflicto de atribuciones entre el Senado y el Gobierno para que, de conformidad con lo establecido en el artículo 188 del Reglamento de la Cámara, el Pleno del Senado requiera formalmente al Gobierno la revocación de su acuerdo, firmado por el Secretario de Estado de Relaciones con las Cortes y Asuntos Constitucionales, de fecha 17 de marzo de 2025, remitido a la Presidenta del Congreso de los Diputados, de disconformidad respecto a la tramitación de las enmiendas números 5, de los senadores D. Joan Baptista Bagué Roura y D. Eduardo Pujol Bonell, del Grupo Parlamentario Plural en el Senado Junts per Catalunya-Coalición Canaria-Agrupación Herreña Independiente-Bloque Nacionalista Galego; 109 y 110, del Grupo Parlamentario Izquierdas por la Independencia (Esquerra Republicana-Euskal Herria Bildu); y 104, del Grupo Parlamentario Popular en el Senado, aprobadas por el Pleno del Senado en relación con el Proyecto de Ley de prevención de las pérdidas y el desperdicio alimentario.

  • The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
  • Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
  • We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.