18 December 2024, in the Senate

Motion calling on the Government to adopt specific measures to respect the professionalism of the State Security Forces and Corps, review the criteria for promotions and decorations, and investigate possible involvement in corruption schemes.

More votes in favour 145 yes · 105 no · 8 abst.

More votes in favour: 145 yes and 105 no, a margin of 40. 8 abstentions and 1 did not vote.

When we cannot be sure which majority was needed, we do not say whether this means it “passed”: the official file does not say.

Source: Senate, vote 38 of sitting 40· updated 12 Nov

The chamber

Who voted how?

145 in favour, 105 against. 8 abstentions and 1 did not vote. 4 voted differently from their group.

Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.

Your province

How did the senators from your province vote?

Only senators elected in a province or island appear. Senators appointed by regional parliaments have no province.

Or see how most of each province voted

The groups

How did each group vote?

In favour, most of Mixto and Popular en el Senado. Against, most of Izquierdas Por la Independencia (Esquerra Republicana-euskal Herria Bildu), Izquierda Confederal (Más Madrid, Eivissa i Formentera Al Senat, Compromís, Agrupación Socialista Gomera y Geroa Bai), Socialista and Plural en el Senado Junts per Catalunya-coalición Canaria-agrupación Herreña Independiente-bloque Nacionalista Galego.

Result by parliamentary group
Group	Seats	How it voted
Izquierdas Por la Independencia (Esquerra Republicana-euskal Herria Bildu)	7	7 against
Izquierda Confederal (Más Madrid, Eivissa i Formentera Al Senat, Compromís, Agrupación Socialista Gomera y Geroa Bai)	6	6 against
Socialista	87	87 against
Vasco en el Senado (EAJ-PNV)	6	1 against · 5 abst.
Plural en el Senado Junts per Catalunya-coalición Canaria-agrupación Herreña Independiente-bloque Nacionalista Galego	7	4 against · 2 abst. · 1 did not vote
Mixto	4	3 in favour · 1 abst.
Popular en el Senado	142	142 in favour

Sources

Where does all this come from?

Official wording of what was voted on: Moción por la que se insta al Gobierno a la adopción de determinadas medidas para respetar la profesionalidad de las Fuerzas y Cuerpos de Seguridad del Estado, revisar los criterios de ascensos y condecoraciones e investigar posibles colaboraciones en tramas de corrupción.

Senate, vote 38 of sitting 40
The count and every seat’s vote.

Retrieved 12 November 2026

The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.

Read the full method · Report an error

Motion calling on the Government to adopt specific measures to respect the professionalism of the State Security Forces and Corps, review the criteria for promotions and decorations, and investigate possible involvement in corruption schemes. Automatic translation · See the Spanish original

Who voted how?

How did the senators from your province vote?

How did each group vote?

Where does all this come from?

Motion calling on the Government to adopt specific measures to respect the professionalism of the State Security Forces and Corps, review the criteria for promotions and decorations, and investigate possible involvement in corruption schemes.