Skip to content

Where are you from?

Choose your province and we will tell you how the deputies and senators you elected vote, one by one.

 

We remember it in this browser. If you create an account, we keep it there.
Sign in

Type a law, a topic, a person or a province.

25 May 2022, in the Senate

Motion calling on the Government to establish a new procedure for the recognition of reduction coefficients for the retirement age.

More votes in favour 246 yes · 0 no · 2 abst.

More votes in favour: 246 yes and 0 no, a margin of 246. 2 abstentions.

When we cannot be sure which majority was needed, we do not say whether this means it “passed”: the official file does not say.

Source: Senate, vote 66 of sitting 50· updated 10 Nov

The chamber

Who voted how?

246 in favour, 0 against. 2 abstentions. 1 voted differently from their group.

Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.

Your province

How did the senators from your province vote?

Only senators elected in a province or island appear. Senators appointed by regional parliaments have no province.

Or see how most of each province voted

The groups

How did each group vote?

In favour, most of Esquerra Republicana-euskal Herria Bildu, De Izquierda Confederal (Adelante Andalucía, Més per Mallorca, Más Madrid, Compromís, Geroa Bai y Agrupación Socialista Gomera), Socialista, Vasco en el Senado (EAJ-PNV), Nacionalista en el Senado Junts per Catalunya-coalición Canaria/partido Nacionalista Canario, Democrático (Ciudadanos, Agrupación de Electores "Teruel Existe" y Partido Regionalista de Cantabria) and Popular en el Senado.

Result by parliamentary group
GroupSeatsHow it voted
Esquerra Republicana-euskal Herria Bildu15
15 in favour
De Izquierda Confederal (Adelante Andalucía, Més per Mallorca, Más Madrid, Compromís, Geroa Bai y Agrupación Socialista Gomera)3
3 in favour
Socialista112
112 in favour
Vasco en el Senado (EAJ-PNV)10
10 in favour
Nacionalista en el Senado Junts per Catalunya-coalición Canaria/partido Nacionalista Canario3
3 in favour
Mixto3
1 in favour · 2 abst.
Democrático (Ciudadanos, Agrupación de Electores "Teruel Existe" y Partido Regionalista de Cantabria)3
3 in favour
Popular en el Senado99
99 in favour

Sources

Where does all this come from?

Official wording of what was voted on: Moción por la que se insta al Gobierno a establecer un nuevo procedimiento para el reconocimiento de coeficientes reductores de la edad de jubilación.

  • The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
  • Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
  • We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.

Read the full method · Report an error