Skip to content

Where are you from?

Choose your province and we will tell you how the deputies and senators you elected vote, one by one.

 

We remember it in this browser. If you create an account, we keep it there.

Type a law, a topic, a person or a province.

21 February 2018, in the Senate

Motion by which the Government is urged to present an urgent proposal to guarantee the sustainability of the public pension system and avoid the loss of purchasing power of pensioners.

More votes against 106 yes · 141 no · 1 abst.

More votes against: 141 no and 106 yes, a margin of 35. 1 abstention.

When we cannot be sure which majority was needed, we do not say whether this means it “passed”: the official file does not say.

Source: Senate, vote 1001 of sitting 31· updated 10 Nov

The chamber

Who voted how?

106 in favour, 141 against. 1 abstention. 1 voted differently from their group.

Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.

Your province

How did the senators from your province vote?

Only senators elected in a province or island appear. Senators appointed by regional parliaments have no province.

Or see how most of each province voted

The groups

How did each group vote?

In favour, most of Esquerra, Socialista, Vasco, Mixto, GPN and Podemos. Against, most of Popular.

Result by parliamentary group
GroupSeatsHow it voted
Esquerra12
12 in favour
Socialista58
58 in favour
Vasco5
5 in favour
Mixto8
7 in favour · 1 abst.
GPN6
6 in favour
Podemos18
18 in favour
Popular141
141 against

Sources

Where does all this come from?

Official wording of what was voted on: Moción por la que se insta al Gobierno a presentar una propuesta urgente para garantizar la sostenibilidad del sistema público de pensiones y evitar la pérdida de poder adquisitivo de los pensionistas.

  • The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
  • Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
  • We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.