Skip to content

Where are you from?

Choose your province and we will tell you how the deputies and senators you elected vote, one by one.

 

We remember it in this browser. If you create an account, we keep it there.
Sign in

Type a law, a topic, a person or a province.

30 November 2016, in the Senate

Private member's bill on improvements in the economic benefit of Social Security for child care.

More votes against 105 yes · 135 no

More votes against: 135 no and 105 yes, a margin of 30. 1 did not vote.

No stage no data Private member's bill on improvements in the economic benefit of Social Security for child care.

When we cannot be sure which majority was needed, we do not say whether this means it “passed”: the official file does not say.

Source: Senate, vote 1011 of sitting 6· updated 10 Nov

The chamber

Who voted how?

105 in favour, 135 against. 1 did not vote. 1 voted differently from their group.

Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.

Your province

How did the senators from your province vote?

Only senators elected in a province or island appear. Senators appointed by regional parliaments have no province.

Or see how most of each province voted

The groups

How did each group vote?

In favour, most of Esquerra, Socialista, Vasco, Mixto and Podemos. Against, most of Popular.

Result by parliamentary group
GroupSeatsHow it voted
Esquerra12
12 in favour
Socialista56
56 in favour
Vasco6
6 in favour
Mixto14
13 in favour · 1 against
Podemos18
18 in favour
Popular135
134 against · 1 did not vote

Sources

Where does all this come from?

Official wording of what was voted on: Proposición de Ley sobre mejoras en la prestación económica de la Seguridad Social para la crianza de los hijos.

  • The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
  • Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
  • We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.

Read the full method · Report an error