11 October 2017, in the Senate
Private member's bill on urgent measures for the conservation of forest soils affected by fires.
More votes against 82 yes · 151 no · 4 abst.More votes against: 151 no and 82 yes, a margin of 69. 4 abstentions and 11 did not vote.
No stage no data Private member's bill on urgent measures for the conservation of forest soils affected by fires.
When we cannot be sure which majority was needed, we do not say whether this means it “passed”: the official file does not say.
Source: Senate, vote 1005 of sitting 23· updated 10 Nov
The chamber
Who voted how?
82 in favour, 151 against. 4 abstentions and 11 did not vote. 5 voted differently from their group.
Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.
Your province
How did the senators from your province vote?
Only senators elected in a province or island appear. Senators appointed by regional parliaments have no province.
Or see how most of each province voted
- A Coruña More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Albacete More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Alicante/Alacant Tie 1 yes · 1 no
- Almería More votes against 0 yes · 2 no
- Araba/Álava More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no
- Asturias More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Ávila More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Badajoz More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Barcelona More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no
- Bizkaia Tie 1 yes · 1 no
- Burgos More votes against 0 yes · 2 no
- Cáceres More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Cádiz More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Cantabria More votes against 0 yes · 3 no
- Castellón/Castelló More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Ceuta More votes against 0 yes · 2 no
- Ciudad Real More votes against 0 yes · 3 no
- Córdoba Tie 1 yes · 1 no
- Cuenca More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Gipuzkoa Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Girona No count 0 yes · 0 no
- Granada More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Guadalajara More votes against 0 yes · 3 no
- Huelva More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Huesca More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Illes Balears More votes against 1 yes · 4 no
- Jaén More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no
- La Rioja More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Las Palmas More votes against 1 yes · 4 no
- León More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Lleida No count 0 yes · 0 no
- Lugo More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Madrid More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Málaga Tie 1 yes · 1 no
- Melilla No data
- Murcia More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Navarra More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Ourense Tie 1 yes · 1 no
- Palencia More votes against 0 yes · 3 no
- Pontevedra Tie 1 yes · 1 no
- Salamanca More votes in favour 1 yes · 0 no
- Santa Cruz de Tenerife More votes against 0 yes · 3 no
- Segovia More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Sevilla More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no
- Soria More votes against 0 yes · 2 no
- Tarragona More votes in favour 1 yes · 0 no
- Teruel More votes against 0 yes · 2 no
- Toledo More votes against 0 yes · 2 no
- Valencia/València More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Valladolid More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Zamora More votes against 0 yes · 2 no
- Zaragoza More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
The groups
How did each group vote?
In favour, most of Socialista, Mixto and Podemos. Against, most of Vasco and Popular.
| Group | Seats | How it voted |
|---|---|---|
| Esquerra | 11 | 11 did not vote |
| Socialista | 55 | 55 in favour |
| Vasco | 5 | 5 against |
| Mixto | 10 | 7 in favour · 3 against |
| GPN | 6 | 2 against · 4 abst. |
| Podemos | 20 | 20 in favour |
| Popular | 141 | 141 against |
Sources
Where does all this come from?
Official wording of what was voted on: Proposición de Ley de medidas urgentes de conservación de suelos forestales afectados por incendios.
- Senate, vote 1005 of sitting 23
The count and every seat’s vote.
Retrieved 10 November 2026
- The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
- Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
- We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.