Skip to content

Where are you from?

Choose your province and we will tell you how the deputies and senators you elected vote, one by one.

 

We remember it in this browser. If you create an account, we keep it there.
Sign in

Type a law, a topic, a person or a province.

19 October 2016, in the Senate

Proposal to amend the Senate Rules of Procedure to modify Article 49.3.

More votes in favour 141 yes · 16 no · 94 abst.

More votes in favour: 141 yes and 16 no, a margin of 125. 94 abstentions.

No stage no data Proposal to amend the Senate Rules of Procedure to modify Article 49.3.

When we cannot be sure which majority was needed, we do not say whether this means it “passed”: the official file does not say.

Source: Senate, vote 1007 of sitting 3· updated 10 Nov

The chamber

Who voted how?

141 in favour, 16 against. 94 abstentions. 7 voted differently from their group.

Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.

Your province

How did the senators from your province vote?

Only senators elected in a province or island appear. Senators appointed by regional parliaments have no province.

Or see how most of each province voted

The groups

How did each group vote?

In favour, most of Popular. Against, most of Esquerra.

Result by parliamentary group
GroupSeatsHow it voted
Esquerra12
12 against
Socialista59
59 abst.
Vasco6
6 abst.
Mixto15
3 in favour · 4 against · 8 abst.
Podemos21
21 abst.
Popular138
138 in favour

Sources

Where does all this come from?

Official wording of what was voted on: Propuesta de reforma del Reglamento del Senado por la que se modifica el artículo 49.3.

  • The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
  • Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
  • We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.

Read the full method · Report an error