Skip to content

Where are you from?

Choose your province and we will tell you how the deputies and senators you elected vote, one by one.

 

We remember it in this browser. If you create an account, we keep it there.

Type a law, a topic, a person or a province.

10 May 2017, in the Senate

Proposal for reform of the Senate Rules of Procedure amending Article 86.

More votes against 49 yes · 145 no · 58 abst.

More votes against: 145 no and 49 yes, a margin of 96. 58 abstentions.

No stage no data Proposal for reform of the Senate Rules of Procedure amending Article 86.

When we cannot be sure which majority was needed, we do not say whether this means it “passed”: the official file does not say.

Source: Senate, vote 1010 of sitting 16· updated 10 Nov

The chamber

Who voted how?

49 in favour, 145 against. 58 abstentions. 3 voted differently from their group.

Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.

Your province

How did the senators from your province vote?

Only senators elected in a province or island appear. Senators appointed by regional parliaments have no province.

Or see how most of each province voted

The groups

How did each group vote?

In favour, most of Esquerra, Vasco, Mixto and Podemos. Against, most of Popular.

Result by parliamentary group
GroupSeatsHow it voted
Esquerra12
12 in favour
Socialista58
1 against · 57 abst.
Vasco6
6 in favour
Mixto15
14 in favour · 1 abst.
Podemos16
16 in favour
Popular145
1 in favour · 144 against

Sources

Where does all this come from?

Official wording of what was voted on: Propuesta de reforma del Reglamento del Senado por la que se modifica el artículo 86.

  • The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
  • Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
  • We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.