12 April 2016, in the Senate
Motion by which it is proposed that the Senate agrees on the creation, within the Constitutional Committee, of a Study Panel on the institution of special jurisdictional status to propose its reform and limitation.
More votes in favour 142 yes · 94 no · 22 abst.More votes in favour: 142 yes and 94 no, a margin of 48. 22 abstentions.
When we cannot be sure which majority was needed, we do not say whether this means it “passed”: the official file does not say.
Source: Senate, vote 1000 of sitting 4· updated 10 Nov
The chamber
Who voted how?
142 in favour, 94 against. 22 abstentions. 2 voted differently from their group.
Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.
Your province
How did the senators from your province vote?
Only senators elected in a province or island appear. Senators appointed by regional parliaments have no province.
Or see how most of each province voted
- A Coruña Tie 0 yes · 0 no · 1 abst.
- Albacete No data
- Alicante/Alacant More votes against 0 yes · 1 no
- Almería No data
- Araba/Álava No data
- Asturias No data
- Ávila No data
- Badajoz More votes against 0 yes · 2 no
- Barcelona No data
- Bizkaia No data
- Burgos No data
- Cáceres No data
- Cádiz No data
- Cantabria No data
- Castellón/Castelló No data
- Ceuta No data
- Ciudad Real No data
- Córdoba More votes against 0 yes · 2 no
- Cuenca No data
- Gipuzkoa More votes against 0 yes · 1 no
- Girona No data
- Granada Tie 1 yes · 1 no
- Guadalajara No data
- Huelva No data
- Huesca No data
- Illes Balears No data
- Jaén No data
- La Rioja No data
- Las Palmas More votes in favour 2 yes · 0 no · 2 abst.
- León No data
- Lleida More votes against 0 yes · 2 no
- Lugo No data
- Madrid No data
- Málaga More votes in favour 1 yes · 0 no
- Melilla No data
- Murcia No data
- Navarra More votes against 0 yes · 1 no
- Ourense No data
- Palencia No data
- Pontevedra No data
- Salamanca No data
- Santa Cruz de Tenerife More votes in favour 1 yes · 0 no
- Segovia No data
- Sevilla No data
- Soria More votes against 0 yes · 1 no
- Tarragona More votes against 0 yes · 1 no
- Teruel No data
- Toledo No data
- Valencia/València Tie 0 yes · 0 no · 1 abst.
- Valladolid No data
- Zamora No data
- Zaragoza No data
The groups
How did each group vote?
In favour, most of Popular. Against, most of Esquerra, Socialista, Vasco, Mixto and Democràcia i Llibert.
| Group | Seats | How it voted |
|---|---|---|
| Esquerra | 8 | 8 against |
| Socialista | 65 | 65 against |
| Vasco | 7 | 7 against |
| Mixto | 9 | 2 in favour · 7 against |
| Democràcia i Llibert | 7 | 7 against |
| Podemos | 22 | 22 abst. |
| Popular | 140 | 140 in favour |
Sources
Where does all this come from?
Official wording of what was voted on: Moción por la que se propone que el Senado acuerde la creación, en el seno de la Comisión Constitucional, de una Ponencia de estudio sobre la institución del aforamiento para proponer su reforma y limitación.
- Senate, vote 1000 of sitting 4
The count and every seat’s vote.
Retrieved 10 November 2026
- The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
- Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
- We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.