2 September 2015, in the Senate

Private member's bill for an Organic Law amending the Criminal Procedure Act to strengthen procedural guarantees and regulate technological investigation measures.

More votes against 10 yes · 150 no · 81 abst.

More votes against: 150 no and 10 yes, a margin of 140. 81 abstentions and 1 did not vote.

No stage no data Private member's bill for an Organic Law amending the Criminal Procedure Act to strengthen procedural guarantees and regulate technological investigation measures.

When we cannot be sure which majority was needed, we do not say whether this means it “passed”: the official file does not say.

Source: Senate, vote 3105 of sitting 78· updated 10 Nov

The chamber

Who voted how?

10 in favour, 150 against. 81 abstentions and 1 did not vote. 6 voted differently from their group.

Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.

Your province

How did the senators from your province vote?

Only senators elected in a province or island appear. Senators appointed by regional parliaments have no province.

Or see how most of each province voted

The groups

How did each group vote?

In favour, most of Vasco (EAJ-PNV). Against, most of Popular.

Result by parliamentary group
Group	Seats	How it voted
Socialista	55	55 abst.
Vasco (EAJ-PNV)	5	5 in favour
Mixto	14	4 in favour · 1 against · 8 abst. · 1 did not vote
Convergencia i Unio	11	11 abst.
Entesa Pel Progrés	8	1 in favour · 7 abst.
Popular	149	149 against

Sources

Where does all this come from?

Official wording of what was voted on: Proyecto de Ley Orgánica de modificación de la Ley de Enjuiciamiento Criminal para el fortalecimiento de las garantías procesales y la regulación de las medidas de investigación tecnológica.

Senate, vote 3105 of sitting 78
The count and every seat’s vote.

Retrieved 10 November 2026

The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.

Read the full method · Report an error

Private member's bill for an Organic Law amending the Criminal Procedure Act to strengthen procedural guarantees and regulate technological investigation measures. Automatic translation · See the Spanish original

Who voted how?

How did the senators from your province vote?

How did each group vote?

Where does all this come from?

Private member's bill for an Organic Law amending the Criminal Procedure Act to strengthen procedural guarantees and regulate technological investigation measures.