Skip to content

Where are you from?

Choose your province and we will tell you how the deputies and senators you elected vote, one by one.

 

We remember it in this browser. If you create an account, we keep it there.
Sign in

Type a law, a topic, a person or a province.

27 March 2012, in the Senate

Motion urging the Government not to propose the reconsideration of the current system of election and functioning of the General Council of the Judiciary, so that it can improve the fulfillment of the functions constitutionally attributed to it.

More votes against 73 yes · 155 no

More votes against: 155 no and 73 yes, a margin of 82.

When we cannot be sure which majority was needed, we do not say whether this means it “passed”: the official file does not say.

Source: Senate, vote 1002 of sitting 7· updated 10 Nov

The chamber

Who voted how?

73 in favour, 155 against.

This vote does not publish each seat’s vote: the chart is drawn from the totals.

This vote does not publish each seat’s vote: the dots are drawn from the totals.

Your province

How did the senators from your province vote?

This vote did not publish each senator’s vote, so we cannot tell you how yours voted.

Only senators elected in a province or island appear. Senators appointed by regional parliaments have no province.

Sources

Where does all this come from?

Official wording of what was voted on: Moción por la que se insta al Gobierno a no plantear la reconsideración del presente sistema de elección y funcionamiento del Consejo General del Poder Judicial, a fin de que éste pueda mejorar el cumplimiento de las funciones que constitucionalmente tiene atribuidas.

  • The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
  • Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
  • We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.

Read the full method · Report an error