Skip to content

Where are you from?

Choose your province and we will tell you how the deputies and senators you elected vote, one by one.

 

We remember it in this browser. If you create an account, we keep it there.
Sign in

Type a law, a topic, a person or a province.

15 April 2015, in the Senate

Study report on the development of new management formulas for cooperation, established within the Committee on International Cooperation for Development.

More votes in favour 208 yes · 2 no

More votes in favour: 208 yes and 2 no, a margin of 206.

When we cannot be sure which majority was needed, we do not say whether this means it “passed”: the official file does not say.

Source: Senate, vote 1008 of sitting 70· updated 10 Nov

The chamber

Who voted how?

208 in favour, 2 against. 2 voted differently from their group.

Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.

Your province

How did the senators from your province vote?

Only senators elected in a province or island appear. Senators appointed by regional parliaments have no province.

Or see how most of each province voted

The groups

How did each group vote?

In favour, most of Socialista, Vasco (EAJ-PNV), Mixto, Convergencia i Unio, Entesa Pel Progrés and Popular.

Result by parliamentary group
GroupSeatsHow it voted
Socialista52
52 in favour
Vasco (EAJ-PNV)5
5 in favour
Mixto1
1 in favour
Convergencia i Unio11
11 in favour
Entesa Pel Progrés8
8 in favour
Popular133
131 in favour · 2 against

Sources

Where does all this come from?

Official wording of what was voted on: Ponencia de estudio sobre el desarrollo de nuevas fórmulas de gestión de la cooperación, constituida en el seno de la Comisión de Cooperación Internacional para el Desarrollo.

  • The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
  • Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
  • We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.

Read the full method · Report an error