10 December 2014, in the Senate
Government bill amending the consolidated text of the General Social Security Law regarding the legal regime of the Mutual Societies for Work Accidents and Occupational Diseases of the Social Security.
More votes in favour 159 yes · 73 no · 10 abst.More votes in favour: 159 yes and 73 no, a margin of 86. 10 abstentions.
When we cannot be sure which majority was needed, we do not say whether this means it “passed”: the official file does not say.
Source: Senate, vote 1166 of sitting 64· updated 10 Nov
The chamber
Who voted how?
159 in favour, 73 against. 10 abstentions. 8 voted differently from their group.
Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.
Your province
How did the senators from your province vote?
Only senators elected in a province or island appear. Senators appointed by regional parliaments have no province.
Or see how most of each province voted
- A Coruña Tie 1 yes · 1 no
- Albacete Tie 1 yes · 1 no
- Alicante/Alacant More votes in favour 2 yes · 0 no
- Almería More votes in favour 1 yes · 0 no
- Araba/Álava More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no
- Asturias More votes in favour 2 yes · 0 no
- Ávila More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Badajoz More votes in favour 1 yes · 0 no
- Barcelona More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Bizkaia More votes against 0 yes · 1 no · 2 abst.
- Burgos More votes in favour 2 yes · 0 no
- Cáceres More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no
- Cádiz More votes in favour 2 yes · 0 no
- Cantabria More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no
- Castellón/Castelló More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Ceuta More votes in favour 1 yes · 0 no
- Ciudad Real More votes in favour 2 yes · 0 no
- Córdoba More votes against 0 yes · 1 no
- Cuenca More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no
- Gipuzkoa More votes against 0 yes · 1 no
- Girona More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Granada Tie 1 yes · 1 no
- Guadalajara Tie 1 yes · 1 no
- Huelva More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no
- Huesca Tie 1 yes · 1 no
- Illes Balears More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no
- Jaén More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no
- La Rioja More votes in favour 2 yes · 0 no
- Las Palmas More votes in favour 2 yes · 0 no · 1 abst.
- León Tie 1 yes · 1 no
- Lleida Tie 1 yes · 1 no
- Lugo More votes in favour 1 yes · 0 no
- Madrid Tie 1 yes · 1 no
- Málaga Tie 1 yes · 1 no
- Melilla More votes in favour 1 yes · 0 no
- Murcia More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Navarra Tie 1 yes · 1 no
- Ourense Tie 1 yes · 1 no
- Palencia More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Pontevedra More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no
- Salamanca More votes in favour 3 yes · 1 no
- Santa Cruz de Tenerife Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Segovia More votes in favour 1 yes · 0 no
- Sevilla More votes against 0 yes · 2 no
- Soria More votes in favour 1 yes · 0 no
- Tarragona Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Teruel Tie 1 yes · 1 no · 1 abst.
- Toledo Tie 1 yes · 1 no
- Valencia/València More votes in favour 2 yes · 1 no
- Valladolid More votes in favour 2 yes · 0 no
- Zamora More votes in favour 2 yes · 0 no
- Zaragoza More votes against 0 yes · 2 no
The groups
How did each group vote?
In favour, most of Convergencia i Unio and Popular. Against, most of Socialista, Mixto and Entesa Pel Progrés.
| Group | Seats | How it voted |
|---|---|---|
| Socialista | 59 | 1 in favour · 58 against |
| Vasco (EAJ-PNV) | 4 | 4 abst. |
| Mixto | 8 | 5 against · 3 abst. |
| Convergencia i Unio | 12 | 12 in favour |
| Entesa Pel Progrés | 9 | 9 against |
| Popular | 150 | 146 in favour · 1 against · 3 abst. |
Sources
Where does all this come from?
Official wording of what was voted on: Proyecto de Ley por la que se modifica el texto refundido de la Ley General de la Seguridad Social en relación con el régimen jurídico de las Mutuas de Accidentes de Trabajo y Enfermedades Profesionales de la Seguridad Social.
- Senate, vote 1166 of sitting 64
The count and every seat’s vote.
Retrieved 10 November 2026
- The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
- Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
- We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.