Skip to content

Where are you from?

Choose your province and we will tell you how the deputies and senators you elected vote, one by one.

 

We remember it in this browser. If you create an account, we keep it there.
Sign in

Type a law, a topic, a person or a province.

27 November 2014, in the Senate

Government bill amending the Capital Companies Law for the improvement of corporate governance.

More votes against 21 yes · 138 no · 68 abst.

More votes against: 138 no and 21 yes, a margin of 117. 68 abstentions.

No stage no data Government bill amending the Capital Companies Law for the improvement of corporate governance.

When we cannot be sure which majority was needed, we do not say whether this means it “passed”: the official file does not say.

Source: Senate, vote 1074 of sitting 63· updated 10 Nov

The chamber

Who voted how?

21 in favour, 138 against. 68 abstentions. 8 voted differently from their group.

Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.

Your province

How did the senators from your province vote?

Only senators elected in a province or island appear. Senators appointed by regional parliaments have no province.

Or see how most of each province voted

The groups

How did each group vote?

In favour, most of Mixto and Convergencia i Unio. Against, most of Popular.

Result by parliamentary group
GroupSeatsHow it voted
Socialista58
4 in favour · 54 abst.
Vasco (EAJ-PNV)5
5 abst.
Mixto5
3 in favour · 2 abst.
Convergencia i Unio12
12 in favour
Entesa Pel Progrés9
2 in favour · 7 abst.
Popular138
138 against

Sources

Where does all this come from?

Official wording of what was voted on: Proyecto de Ley por la que se modifica la Ley de Sociedades de Capital para la mejora del gobierno corporativo.

  • The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
  • Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
  • We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.

Read the full method · Report an error