10 September 2014, in the Senate
Government bill regulating the fees of the National Securities Market Commission.
More votes against 62 yes · 145 no · 14 abst.More votes against: 145 no and 62 yes, a margin of 83. 14 abstentions.
No stage no data Government bill regulating the fees of the National Securities Market Commission.
When we cannot be sure which majority was needed, we do not say whether this means it “passed”: the official file does not say.
Source: Senate, vote 1032 of sitting 58· updated 10 Nov
The chamber
Who voted how?
62 in favour, 145 against. 14 abstentions. 1 voted differently from their group.
Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.
Your province
How did the senators from your province vote?
Only senators elected in a province or island appear. Senators appointed by regional parliaments have no province.
Or see how most of each province voted
- A Coruña Tie 1 yes · 1 no
- Albacete More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Alicante/Alacant More votes against 0 yes · 2 no
- Almería More votes against 0 yes · 1 no
- Araba/Álava More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Asturias More votes against 0 yes · 2 no
- Ávila More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Badajoz More votes against 0 yes · 1 no
- Barcelona More votes in favour 1 yes · 0 no
- Bizkaia More votes in favour 1 yes · 0 no
- Burgos More votes against 0 yes · 2 no
- Cáceres More votes against 0 yes · 3 no
- Cádiz More votes against 0 yes · 2 no
- Cantabria More votes against 0 yes · 2 no
- Castellón/Castelló More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Ceuta More votes against 0 yes · 2 no
- Ciudad Real More votes against 0 yes · 2 no
- Córdoba More votes against 0 yes · 1 no
- Cuenca More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Gipuzkoa No data
- Girona More votes in favour 1 yes · 0 no · 1 abst.
- Granada Tie 1 yes · 1 no
- Guadalajara Tie 1 yes · 1 no
- Huelva More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Huesca More votes in favour 1 yes · 0 no
- Illes Balears More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Jaén More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- La Rioja More votes against 0 yes · 2 no
- Las Palmas More votes against 1 yes · 2 no · 1 abst.
- León Tie 1 yes · 1 no
- Lleida Tie 0 yes · 0 no · 1 abst.
- Lugo More votes against 0 yes · 1 no
- Madrid Tie 1 yes · 1 no
- Málaga Tie 1 yes · 1 no
- Melilla No data
- Murcia More votes against 0 yes · 2 no
- Navarra Tie 1 yes · 1 no
- Ourense Tie 1 yes · 1 no
- Palencia Tie 1 yes · 1 no
- Pontevedra More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Salamanca More votes against 0 yes · 3 no
- Santa Cruz de Tenerife Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- Segovia More votes against 0 yes · 1 no
- Sevilla No data
- Soria More votes against 0 yes · 1 no
- Tarragona More votes in favour 2 yes · 0 no · 2 abst.
- Teruel Tie 1 yes · 1 no
- Toledo Tie 1 yes · 1 no
- Valencia/València More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Valladolid More votes against 0 yes · 1 no
- Zamora More votes against 0 yes · 2 no
- Zaragoza More votes in favour 1 yes · 0 no
The groups
How did each group vote?
In favour, most of Socialista and Entesa Pel Progrés. Against, most of Vasco (EAJ-PNV) and Popular.
| Group | Seats | How it voted |
|---|---|---|
| Socialista | 56 | 56 in favour |
| Vasco (EAJ-PNV) | 3 | 3 against |
| Mixto | 5 | 1 in favour · 4 abst. |
| Convergencia i Unio | 10 | 10 abst. |
| Entesa Pel Progrés | 5 | 5 in favour |
| Popular | 142 | 142 against |
Sources
Where does all this come from?
Official wording of what was voted on: Proyecto de Ley por la que se regulan las tasas de la Comisión Nacional del Mercado de Valores.
- Senate, vote 1032 of sitting 58
The count and every seat’s vote.
Retrieved 10 November 2026
- The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
- Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
- We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.