9 July 2014, in the Senate
Government bill on the transformation of the Fund for the financing of Payments to Suppliers.
More votes against 93 yes · 149 no · 1 abst.More votes against: 149 no and 93 yes, a margin of 56. 1 abstention and 2 did not vote.
No stage no data Government bill on the transformation of the Fund for the financing of Payments to Suppliers.
When we cannot be sure which majority was needed, we do not say whether this means it “passed”: the official file does not say.
Source: Senate, vote 1016 of sitting 57· updated 10 Nov
The chamber
Who voted how?
93 in favour, 149 against. 1 abstention and 2 did not vote. 1 voted differently from their group.
Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.
Your province
How did the senators from your province vote?
Only senators elected in a province or island appear. Senators appointed by regional parliaments have no province.
Or see how most of each province voted
- A Coruña Tie 1 yes · 1 no
- Albacete More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Alicante/Alacant More votes against 0 yes · 2 no
- Almería More votes against 0 yes · 1 no
- Araba/Álava More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Asturias More votes against 0 yes · 2 no
- Ávila More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Badajoz More votes against 0 yes · 1 no
- Barcelona More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no
- Bizkaia More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no
- Burgos More votes against 0 yes · 2 no
- Cáceres More votes against 0 yes · 2 no
- Cádiz More votes against 0 yes · 1 no
- Cantabria More votes against 0 yes · 3 no
- Castellón/Castelló More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Ceuta More votes against 0 yes · 2 no
- Ciudad Real More votes against 0 yes · 2 no
- Córdoba Tie 1 yes · 1 no
- Cuenca More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Gipuzkoa No count 0 yes · 0 no
- Girona More votes in favour 3 yes · 0 no
- Granada Tie 1 yes · 1 no
- Guadalajara Tie 1 yes · 1 no
- Huelva More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Huesca Tie 1 yes · 1 no
- Illes Balears More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Jaén More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- La Rioja More votes against 0 yes · 1 no
- Las Palmas Tie 2 yes · 2 no
- León Tie 1 yes · 1 no · 1 abst.
- Lleida More votes in favour 2 yes · 0 no
- Lugo More votes against 0 yes · 1 no
- Madrid Tie 1 yes · 1 no
- Málaga Tie 1 yes · 1 no
- Melilla More votes against 0 yes · 1 no
- Murcia More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Navarra Tie 1 yes · 1 no
- Ourense Tie 1 yes · 1 no
- Palencia More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Pontevedra More votes against 1 yes · 3 no
- Salamanca More votes against 0 yes · 3 no
- Santa Cruz de Tenerife More votes in favour 3 yes · 2 no
- Segovia More votes against 0 yes · 1 no
- Sevilla More votes in favour 2 yes · 0 no
- Soria More votes against 0 yes · 1 no
- Tarragona More votes in favour 4 yes · 0 no
- Teruel More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Toledo Tie 1 yes · 1 no
- Valencia/València More votes against 1 yes · 2 no
- Valladolid More votes against 0 yes · 2 no
- Zamora More votes against 0 yes · 1 no
- Zaragoza Tie 1 yes · 1 no
The groups
How did each group vote?
In favour, most of Socialista, Vasco (EAJ-PNV), Mixto, Convergencia i Unio and Entesa Pel Progrés. Against, most of Popular.
| Group | Seats | How it voted |
|---|---|---|
| Socialista | 59 | 59 in favour |
| Vasco (EAJ-PNV) | 5 | 5 in favour |
| Mixto | 11 | 8 in favour · 1 abst. · 2 did not vote |
| Convergencia i Unio | 13 | 13 in favour |
| Entesa Pel Progrés | 8 | 8 in favour |
| Popular | 149 | 149 against |
Sources
Where does all this come from?
Official wording of what was voted on: Proyecto de Ley de transformación del Fondo para la financiación de los Pagos a Proveedores.
- Senate, vote 1016 of sitting 57
The count and every seat’s vote.
Retrieved 10 November 2026
- The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
- Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
- We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.