Skip to content

Where are you from?

Choose your province and we will tell you how the deputies and senators you elected vote, one by one.

 

We remember it in this browser. If you create an account, we keep it there.

Type a law, a topic, a person or a province.

19 February 2014, in the Senate

Motion urging the Government to develop a system that enables the transfer of individual transferable quotas (ITQ) by fish species between companies.

More votes in favour 217 yes · 1 no · 16 abst.

More votes in favour: 217 yes and 1 no, a margin of 216. 16 abstentions.

When we cannot be sure which majority was needed, we do not say whether this means it “passed”: the official file does not say.

Source: Senate, vote 1004 of sitting 47· updated 10 Nov

The chamber

Who voted how?

217 in favour, 1 against. 16 abstentions. 1 voted differently from their group.

Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.

Your province

How did the senators from your province vote?

Only senators elected in a province or island appear. Senators appointed by regional parliaments have no province.

Or see how most of each province voted

The groups

How did each group vote?

In favour, most of Socialista, Vasco (EAJ-PNV), Entesa Pel Progrés and Popular.

Result by parliamentary group
GroupSeatsHow it voted
Socialista54
54 in favour
Vasco (EAJ-PNV)4
4 in favour
Mixto12
6 in favour · 6 abst.
Convergencia i Unio10
10 abst.
Entesa Pel Progrés8
8 in favour
Popular146
145 in favour · 1 against

Sources

Where does all this come from?

Official wording of what was voted on: Moción por la que se insta al Gobierno a desarrollar un sistema que posibilite las cuotas individuales transferibles (CIT) por especie pesquera entre las empresas.

  • The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
  • Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
  • We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.