Skip to content

Where are you from?

Choose your province and we will tell you how the deputies and senators you elected vote, one by one.

 

We remember it in this browser. If you create an account, we keep it there.
Sign in

Type a law, a topic, a person or a province.

23 October 2013, in the Senate

Special Study Commission on new forms of social exclusion as a consequence of the sharp increase in unemployment.

More votes against 73 yes · 145 no

More votes against: 145 no and 73 yes, a margin of 72.

When we cannot be sure which majority was needed, we do not say whether this means it “passed”: the official file does not say.

Source: Senate, vote 1007 of sitting 40· updated 10 Nov

The chamber

Who voted how?

73 in favour, 145 against. 2 voted differently from their group.

Each dot is a seat. Tap one, or use the arrow keys, to see who it is.

Your province

How did the senators from your province vote?

Only senators elected in a province or island appear. Senators appointed by regional parliaments have no province.

Or see how most of each province voted

The groups

How did each group vote?

In favour, most of Socialista, Vasco (EAJ-PNV), Convergencia i Unio and Entesa Pel Progrés. Against, most of Mixto and Popular.

Result by parliamentary group
GroupSeatsHow it voted
Socialista50
50 in favour
Vasco (EAJ-PNV)5
5 in favour
Mixto6
2 in favour · 4 against
Convergencia i Unio9
9 in favour
Entesa Pel Progrés7
7 in favour
Popular141
141 against

Sources

Where does all this come from?

Official wording of what was voted on: Comisión Especial de estudio sobre las nuevas formas de exclusión social como consecuencia del fuerte incremento del desempleo.

  • The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
  • Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
  • We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.

Read the full method · Report an error