6 February 2013, in the Senate
Motion urging the Government to adopt various efficiency measures in pharmaceutical spending.
More votes against 83 yes · 149 no · 1 abst.More votes against: 149 no and 83 yes, a margin of 66. 1 abstention.
When we cannot be sure which majority was needed, we do not say whether this means it “passed”: the official file does not say.
Source: Senate, vote 1003 of sitting 26· updated 10 Nov
The chamber
Who voted how?
83 in favour, 149 against. 1 abstention.
This vote does not publish each seat’s vote: the chart is drawn from the totals.
This vote does not publish each seat’s vote: the dots are drawn from the totals.
Your province
How did the senators from your province vote?
This vote did not publish each senator’s vote, so we cannot tell you how yours voted.
Only senators elected in a province or island appear. Senators appointed by regional parliaments have no province.
Sources
Where does all this come from?
Official wording of what was voted on: Moción por la que se insta al Gobierno a la adopción de diversas medidas de eficiencia en el gasto farmacéutico.
- Senate, vote 1003 of sitting 26
The count and every seat’s vote.
Retrieved 10 November 2026
- The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
- Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
- We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.