Skip to content

Where are you from?

Choose your province and we will tell you how the deputies and senators you elected vote, one by one.

 

We remember it in this browser. If you create an account, we keep it there.

Type a law, a topic, a person or a province.

19 December 2012, in the Senate

Motion urging the Government to repeal Law 10/2012, of November 20, regulating certain fees in the field of the Administration of Justice and the National Institute of Toxicology and Forensic Sciences, or to extend indefinitely its entry into force.

More votes against 88 yes · 141 no · 1 abst.

More votes against: 141 no and 88 yes, a margin of 53. 1 abstention.

When we cannot be sure which majority was needed, we do not say whether this means it “passed”: the official file does not say.

Source: Senate, vote 1002 of sitting 24· updated 10 Nov

The chamber

Who voted how?

88 in favour, 141 against. 1 abstention.

This vote does not publish each seat’s vote: the chart is drawn from the totals.

This vote does not publish each seat’s vote: the dots are drawn from the totals.

Your province

How did the senators from your province vote?

This vote did not publish each senator’s vote, so we cannot tell you how yours voted.

Only senators elected in a province or island appear. Senators appointed by regional parliaments have no province.

Sources

Where does all this come from?

Official wording of what was voted on: Moción por la que se insta al Gobierno a la derogación de la Ley 10/2012, de 20 de noviembre, por la que se regulan determinadas tasas en el ámbito de la Administración de Justicia y del Instituto Nacional de Toxicología y Ciencias Forenses, o a la prórroga sine die de su entrada en vigor.

  • The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
  • Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
  • We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.