13 November 2012, in the Senate
Motion urging the Government to adopt certain measures to address the problem of administrative duplication between the central and regional administrations.
More votes against 20 yes · 150 no · 58 abst.More votes against: 150 no and 20 yes, a margin of 130. 58 abstentions.
When we cannot be sure which majority was needed, we do not say whether this means it “passed”: the official file does not say.
Source: Senate, vote 1001 of sitting 22· updated 10 Nov
The chamber
Who voted how?
20 in favour, 150 against. 58 abstentions.
This vote does not publish each seat’s vote: the chart is drawn from the totals.
This vote does not publish each seat’s vote: the dots are drawn from the totals.
Your province
How did the senators from your province vote?
This vote did not publish each senator’s vote, so we cannot tell you how yours voted.
Only senators elected in a province or island appear. Senators appointed by regional parliaments have no province.
Sources
Where does all this come from?
Official wording of what was voted on: Moción por la que se insta al Gobierno a la adopción de determinadas medidas con el fin de abordar el problema de la existencia de duplicidades administrativas entre las administraciones central y autonómica.
- Senate, vote 1001 of sitting 22
The count and every seat’s vote.
Retrieved 10 November 2026
- The data comes from the open files of the Congreso, the Senate and the BOE, unaltered.
- Each deputy’s province is the one of their seat on the day of the vote.
- We only say “passed” or “rejected” when the majority needed is certain; otherwise we say which side had more votes.